Log Cabin opposes Hagel for Defense secretary

  • metta

    Posts: 39099

    Dec 28, 2012 7:46 PM GMT
    Gay Republicans Doubt Hagel's "Sincerity"


    http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/gay-republicans-doubt-hagels-sincerity
  • shutoman

    Posts: 505

    Dec 29, 2012 9:21 PM GMT
    Who do they have to support?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 29, 2012 10:25 PM GMT
    I no longer take them seriously after endorsing an obviously anti gay Mitt Romney.
  • TroyAthlete

    Posts: 4269

    Dec 29, 2012 10:25 PM GMT
    They don't support Hagel over stupid comments he made 13 years ago, but they have no problem supporting the anti-gay Romney-Ryan ticket in 2012 or strill today supporting a party that thinks gay couples should be less equal and less free than straight couples.

    Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan support an amendment to the Constitution that will make gays second-class citizens forever. Chuck Hagel voted AGAINST the amendment as a senator after the Bush administration and the GOP dragged it to a vote.

    The Log Cabin Republicans are a hypocritcal jokes, self-loathing partisan frauds whom nobody, not even their own party, takes seriously.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 29, 2012 11:00 PM GMT
    TroyAthlete saidThey don't support Hagel over stupid comments he made 13 years ago, but they have no problem supporting the anti-gay Romney-Ryan ticket in 2012 or strill today supporting a party that thinks gay couples should be less equal and less free than straight couples.

    Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan support an amendment to the Constitution that will make gays second-class citizens forever. Chuck Hagel voted AGAINST the amendment as a senator after the Bush administration and the GOP dragged it to a vote.

    The Log Cabin Republicans are hypocritcal jokes, self-loathing partisan frauds whom nobody, not even their own party, takes seriously.

    +100

    I wonder who's really pulling their strings from inside the Republican Party? Because most of their public pronouncements make no logical sense, as you point out. And certainly not from a gay perspective.