Is there any gay who doesn´t like bottoming?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 10:12 AM GMT
    Today is a sad day. I watched my favourite hotgaylist.com site and I saw Derek Atlas - until today top only great looking hunk - bottoming. Another one icon_mad.gif So, is it possible to find gay guy who doesn´t like bottoming?
  • Brett58

    Posts: 28

    Jan 17, 2013 11:07 AM GMT
    Yep
  • Ej101

    Posts: 444

    Jan 17, 2013 11:09 AM GMT
    I don't like to btm
  • Trauts

    Posts: 1012

    Jan 17, 2013 11:48 AM GMT
    Of course. I'd assume those that are purely top do not like bottoming or they would be at least versatile.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 12:06 PM GMT
    Is this a real question?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 12:20 PM GMT
    Nup I hate bottoming I like anal stimulation but hate the feeling of being fucked
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 12:25 PM GMT
    madfacts saidIs this a real question?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 12:36 PM GMT
    madfacts saidIs this a real question?


    yes, it is real question - for me very important :-)
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 12:37 PM GMT
    Trauts saidOf course. I'd assume those that are purely top do not like bottoming or they would be at least versatile.


    at least verstaile :-(
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 12:50 PM GMT
    Arcturian saidToday is a sad day. I watched my favourite hotgaylist.com site and I saw Derek Atlas - until today top only great looking hunk - bottoming. Another one icon_mad.gif So, is it possible to find gay guy who doesn´t like bottoming?


    I just looked up this guy. He's a porn star. Are you surprised with him being a bottom? He gets paid to perform so isn't that a given?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 12:56 PM GMT
    yourname2000 said
    Arcturian said
    madfacts saidIs this a real question?

    yes, it is real question - for me very important :-)

    I think you really need to look at this.

    A guy you don't know --your fantasy porn top--bottomed....and this seems to have shaken your world paradigm. Why? Do you think he was fantasy material because he was an exclusive top?---and that was somehow diminished when he bottomed?

    One presumes that the reason you held him as a fantasy top is because you are a bottom, and you wanted such a man to ravage you. Is the fact that occasionally (like once in a blue moon) he'll bottom (for porn money, no less) make him less a man? If you answer "yes" to that, do you see that you're calling yourself --a bottom--less of a man? Do you recognize this as a form of self-loathing?

    I think you need to rejigger your thinking on this. He's a "man" (and I mean a fantasy worthy man) regardless of his ratio of topping to bottoming. If your fantasy were to come true, there's no reason to think that his bottoming for one guy (for porn money!) would mean an expectation for you to top him ----in fact, you may bring out a need in him to only top you.

    I would suggest that a broad range of expression makes a man a more fully informed, fully realized version of himself. I'm an exclusive bottom....I'm not into topping at all. But if I met this guy and he decided to go out with me, I would only think his experience would make him a better, more informed lover. I am quite happy with a top who has bottomed. For the right guy, I'll top on the rare times he needs it. I couldn't withhold from someone I love something that I enjoy very much. And to me, to ditch a guy because he bottomed --when that is my primary sexual interest--would be logically inconsistent. I'd feel like I was basically shitting on myself.

    So don't shit on yourself. Give this guy you'll never meet (and future lovers) a pass.


    Seriously this. The best tops I have had have experience with bottoming. I mean, how do you know how to give it when you havent received?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 2:00 PM GMT
    Erik101 said
    Arcturian saidToday is a sad day. I watched my favourite hotgaylist.com site and I saw Derek Atlas - until today top only great looking hunk - bottoming. Another one icon_mad.gif So, is it possible to find gay guy who doesn´t like bottoming?


    I just looked up this guy. He's a porn star. Are you surprised with him being a bottom? He gets paid to perform so isn't that a given?


    That´s it. Everyone there is bottoming, so I hoped at least one won´t. But I accept that job leads You make anything to be still in game...
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 2:05 PM GMT
    Chainers said
    yourname2000 said
    Arcturian said
    madfacts saidIs this a real question?

    yes, it is real question - for me very important :-)

    I think you really need to look at this.

    A guy you don't know --your fantasy porn top--bottomed....and this seems to have shaken your world paradigm. Why? Do you think he was fantasy material because he was an exclusive top?---and that was somehow diminished when he bottomed?

    One presumes that the reason you held him as a fantasy top is because you are a bottom, and you wanted such a man to ravage you. Is the fact that occasionally (like once in a blue moon) he'll bottom (for porn money, no less) make him less a man? If you answer "yes" to that, do you see that you're calling yourself --a bottom--less of a man? Do you recognize this as a form of self-loathing?

    I think you need to rejigger your thinking on this. He's a "man" (and I mean a fantasy worthy man) regardless of his ratio of topping to bottoming. If your fantasy were to come true, there's no reason to think that his bottoming for one guy (for porn money!) would mean an expectation for you to top him ----in fact, you may bring out a need in him to only top you.

    I would suggest that a broad range of expression makes a man a more fully informed, fully realized version of himself. I'm an exclusive bottom....I'm not into topping at all. But if I met this guy and he decided to go out with me, I would only think his experience would make him a better, more informed lover. I am quite happy with a top who has bottomed. For the right guy, I'll top on the rare times he needs it. I couldn't withhold from someone I love something that I enjoy very much. And to me, to ditch a guy because he bottomed --when that is my primary sexual interest--would be logically inconsistent. I'd feel like I was basically shitting on myself.

    So don't shit on yourself. Give this guy you'll never meet (and future lovers) a pass.


    Seriously this. The best tops I have had have experience with bottoming. I mean, how do you know how to give it when you havent received?


    Yes, the best tops have experience with bottoming...but I want those who don´t like it. Man enjoying bottoming just loses my atraction...and I wanted to have some porn stars I´d be atracted to. Anyway, I have no influece on this. This is little Arcturian´s bussiness :-D

    Perhaps it´s also because I don´t do it, I don´t enjoy it so I can´t be good at it. And I like to see man satified. My ego, You know :-D
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 2:50 PM GMT
    Chainers saidSeriously this. The best tops I have had have experience with bottoming. I mean, how do you know how to give it when you havent received?


    I very much agree with this, I don't think you can be a great top if you don't have at least some bottoming experience.

    I am not much of a fan of bottoming, I much much prefer to top, but I do bottom once in a while. Just to keep things fresh, haha!

    Regarding the original post though, why does it matter to you so much? I feel the other way actually, I am often disappointed when porn stars aren't versatile, I want to see them topping and bottoming - 100% at either end is boring, as a viewer.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 2:52 PM GMT
    Arcturian said
    Chainers said
    yourname2000 said
    Arcturian said
    madfacts saidIs this a real question?

    yes, it is real question - for me very important :-)

    I think you really need to look at this.

    A guy you don't know --your fantasy porn top--bottomed....and this seems to have shaken your world paradigm. Why? Do you think he was fantasy material because he was an exclusive top?---and that was somehow diminished when he bottomed?

    One presumes that the reason you held him as a fantasy top is because you are a bottom, and you wanted such a man to ravage you. Is the fact that occasionally (like once in a blue moon) he'll bottom (for porn money, no less) make him less a man? If you answer "yes" to that, do you see that you're calling yourself --a bottom--less of a man? Do you recognize this as a form of self-loathing?

    I think you need to rejigger your thinking on this. He's a "man" (and I mean a fantasy worthy man) regardless of his ratio of topping to bottoming. If your fantasy were to come true, there's no reason to think that his bottoming for one guy (for porn money!) would mean an expectation for you to top him ----in fact, you may bring out a need in him to only top you.

    I would suggest that a broad range of expression makes a man a more fully informed, fully realized version of himself. I'm an exclusive bottom....I'm not into topping at all. But if I met this guy and he decided to go out with me, I would only think his experience would make him a better, more informed lover. I am quite happy with a top who has bottomed. For the right guy, I'll top on the rare times he needs it. I couldn't withhold from someone I love something that I enjoy very much. And to me, to ditch a guy because he bottomed --when that is my primary sexual interest--would be logically inconsistent. I'd feel like I was basically shitting on myself.

    So don't shit on yourself. Give this guy you'll never meet (and future lovers) a pass.


    Seriously this. The best tops I have had have experience with bottoming. I mean, how do you know how to give it when you havent received?


    Yes, the best tops have experience with bottoming...but I want those who don´t like it. Man enjoying bottoming just loses my atraction...and I wanted to have some porn stars I´d be atracted to. Anyway, I have no influece on this. This is little Arcturian´s bussiness :-D

    Perhaps it´s also because I don´t do it, I don´t enjoy it so I can´t be good at it. And I like to see man satified. My ego, You know :-D


    Well to each their own. This idea that people who like to bottom are less of men is kind of bizarre to me but everyone has their thing so go for it.

    I have been with many men who prefer to top, and then want me to top afterwards. They usually stay in control the whole time, which is what turns me on more than someone topping hehe.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 3:07 PM GMT
    yourname2000 said
    Arcturian said
    madfacts saidIs this a real question?

    yes, it is real question - for me very important :-)

    I think you really need to look at this.

    A guy you don't know --your fantasy porn top--bottomed....and this seems to have shaken your world paradigm. Why? Do you think he was fantasy material because he was an exclusive top?---and that was somehow diminished when he bottomed?

    One presumes that the reason you held him as a fantasy top is because you are a bottom, and you wanted such a man to ravage you. Is the fact that occasionally (like once in a blue moon) he'll bottom (for porn money, no less) make him less a man? If you answer "yes" to that, do you see that you're calling yourself --a bottom--less of a man? Do you recognize this as a form of self-loathing?

    I think you need to rejigger your thinking on this. He's a "man" (and I mean a fantasy worthy man) regardless of his ratio of topping to bottoming. If your fantasy were to come true, there's no reason to think that his bottoming for one guy (for porn money!) would mean an expectation for you to top him ----in fact, you may bring out a need in him to only top you.

    I would suggest that a broad range of expression makes a man a more fully informed, fully realized version of himself. I'm an exclusive bottom....I'm not into topping at all. But if I met this guy and he decided to go out with me, I would only think his experience would make him a better, more informed lover. I am quite happy with a top who has bottomed. For the right guy, I'll top on the rare times he needs it. I couldn't withhold from someone I love something that I enjoy very much. And to me, to ditch a guy because he bottomed --when that is my primary sexual interest--would be logically inconsistent. I'd feel like I was basically shitting on myself.

    So don't shit on yourself. Give this guy you'll never meet (and your own future lovers) a pass.


    QFT

    I'm a bottom, but I've topped on occasions. But being a bottom does not make me any less.
  • HottJoe

    Posts: 21366

    Jan 17, 2013 3:26 PM GMT
    I've read other similar comments. YN2K is probably on the money, as usual.

    I will add that my favorite thing to see in any porno is when you can tell by their facial expressions that they're truly enjoying it, particularly the bottom. I LOVE seeing their head in the clouds cum hungry smiles, when it looks like they're fully in the moment and not acting. That's so passionate and hot.

    As far as who's on top, v who's on bottom, I prefer the guy with the bigger dick to top the guy with the nicer ass. I like muscle bottoms, and hung tops. The top can be be thinner and taller, as long as he is more hung and very aggressive when pounding. ( just my personal tastes.)icon_razz.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 4:08 PM GMT
    HottJoe saidI've read other similar comments. YN2K is probably on the money, as usual.

    I will add that my favorite thing to see in any porno is when you can tell by their facial expressions that they're truly enjoying it, particularly the bottom. I LOVE seeing their head in the clouds cum hungry smiles, when it looks like they're fully in the moment and not acting. That's so passionate and hot.

    As far as who's on top, v who's on bottom, I prefer the guy with the bigger dick to top the guy with the nicer ass. I like muscle bottoms, and hung tops. The top can be be thinner and taller, as long as he is more hung and very aggressive when pounding. ( just my personal tastes.)icon_razz.gif


    +1000000000 for the first answer
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 5:18 PM GMT
    Be aggressive! Be be aggressive!!!!

    That's my little cheer I give guys who are plowing me. And while yes, I would prefer my men to be 100% top, it doesn't totally kill my fantasy if they have bottomed before.


    I tell them Don't go making this a habit though!!!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 17, 2013 5:22 PM GMT
    Chainers said
    Arcturian said
    Chainers said
    yourname2000 said
    Arcturian said
    madfacts saidIs this a real question?

    yes, it is real question - for me very important :-)

    I think you really need to look at this.

    A guy you don't know --your fantasy porn top--bottomed....and this seems to have shaken your world paradigm. Why? Do you think he was fantasy material because he was an exclusive top?---and that was somehow diminished when he bottomed?

    One presumes that the reason you held him as a fantasy top is because you are a bottom, and you wanted such a man to ravage you. Is the fact that occasionally (like once in a blue moon) he'll bottom (for porn money, no less) make him less a man? If you answer "yes" to that, do you see that you're calling yourself --a bottom--less of a man? Do you recognize this as a form of self-loathing?

    I think you need to rejigger your thinking on this. He's a "man" (and I mean a fantasy worthy man) regardless of his ratio of topping to bottoming. If your fantasy were to come true, there's no reason to think that his bottoming for one guy (for porn money!) would mean an expectation for you to top him ----in fact, you may bring out a need in him to only top you.

    I would suggest that a broad range of expression makes a man a more fully informed, fully realized version of himself. I'm an exclusive bottom....I'm not into topping at all. But if I met this guy and he decided to go out with me, I would only think his experience would make him a better, more informed lover. I am quite happy with a top who has bottomed. For the right guy, I'll top on the rare times he needs it. I couldn't withhold from someone I love something that I enjoy very much. And to me, to ditch a guy because he bottomed --when that is my primary sexual interest--would be logically inconsistent. I'd feel like I was basically shitting on myself.

    So don't shit on yourself. Give this guy you'll never meet (and future lovers) a pass.


    Seriously this. The best tops I have had have experience with bottoming. I mean, how do you know how to give it when you havent received?


    Yes, the best tops have experience with bottoming...but I want those who don´t like it. Man enjoying bottoming just loses my atraction...and I wanted to have some porn stars I´d be atracted to. Anyway, I have no influece on this. This is little Arcturian´s bussiness :-D

    Perhaps it´s also because I don´t do it, I don´t enjoy it so I can´t be good at it. And I like to see man satified. My ego, You know :-D


    Well to each their own. This idea that people who like to bottom are less of men is kind of bizarre to me but everyone has their thing so go for it.

    I have been with many men who prefer to top, and then want me to top afterwards. They usually stay in control the whole time, which is what turns me on more than someone topping hehe.


    I don´t thinkbottoms are less men. I just like this territory for meicon_biggrin.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 26, 2013 5:05 AM GMT
    I don't like to bottom...it is the worst icon_cry.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 26, 2013 5:08 AM GMT
    Porn stars are interesting. You'd be surprised how many actors are total tops in porn but bottom bitches in their personal life.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 26, 2013 5:10 AM GMT
    nicodegallo saidPorn stars are interesting. You'd be surprised how many actors are total tops in porn but bottom bitches in their personal life.


    How do you know that? icon_confused.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 26, 2013 5:12 AM GMT
    You're buying into preconceived ideas about masculinity and sexual preference. Deny it all you want, but it's quite obvious that you see any man that bottoms as "the woman". This is why you get so turned off when you see your precious top taking it from behind. It's kind of silly really. Some of the most masculine guys I've been with have been bottoms and I've met some total tops that are total women.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 26, 2013 5:53 AM GMT
    How come guys like YN2K and Scruffypup are smart enough to point out the obvious to this silly bitch yet so ignorant about other topics??????