New Mexico Bill Would Criminalize Abortions After Rape As 'Tampering With Evidence'

• metta
  
  Posts: 41354
  
  
  Jan 25, 2013 2:34 AM GMT

  New Mexico Bill Would Criminalize Abortions After Rape As 'Tampering With Evidence'
  
  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/24/new-mexico-abortion-bill_n_2541894.html

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Jan 25, 2013 3:13 AM GMT

  So a rape kit has to include a live baby now?
  That's even morally more dubious than having a baby so a sick sibling could get a bone marrow.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• musclmed
  
  Posts: 3551
  
  
  Jan 25, 2013 3:26 AM GMT

  this is what you get when you let the government practice medicine. Some Frankenstein cyborg.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• coolarmydude
  
  Posts: 9191
  
  
  Jan 25, 2013 3:39 AM GMT

  musclmed saidthis is what you get when you let a Republican government practice medicine. Some Frankenstein cyborg.

  
  
  
  Fixed it!
  
  A Republican lawmaker in New Mexico introduced a bill on Wednesday that would legally require victims of rape to carry their pregnancies to term in order to use the fetus as evidence for a sexual assault trial.
  

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Jan 25, 2013 3:40 AM GMT

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• coolarmydude
  
  Posts: 9191
  
  
  Jan 25, 2013 3:43 AM GMT

  This Republican must be confused. He now wants a fetus to be considered as evidence, an object, but his Party views all fetus' the same life as born people.
  
  Shouldn't this be considered witness tampering?

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Jan 25, 2013 4:36 AM GMT

  Jesus Fucking Christ.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Menergy_1
  
  Posts: 745
  
  
  Jan 25, 2013 3:12 PM GMT

  coolarmydude saidThis Republican must be confused. He now wants a fetus to be considered as evidence, an object, but his Party views all fetus' the same life as born people.
  
  Shouldn't this be considered witness tampering?

  
  
  It's a "SHE" coolarmydude! Not a "he" and that makes it even more bizarre in language and attempted results.....

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Jan 25, 2013 5:06 PM GMT

  coolarmydude saidThis Republican must be confused. He now wants a fetus to be considered as evidence, an object, but his Party views all fetus' the same life as born people.
  
  Shouldn't this be considered witness tampering?

  
  
  Oh I hadn't read any of the responses; I was so completely disgusted by the proposal. Witness tampering instead of destroying evidence. That's funny.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM