For you men who are into astrology, have you found your preference for men in your chart? If yes, explain.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 25, 2013 3:32 AM GMT
    Here's one explanation for one type of M4M orientation:

    Powerful solar system objects (SSOs) at the Self angle (the Ascendant) combined with the square and/or quincunx aspect between the archetypal male and female SSOs, i.e.:

    Sun square/quincunx Moon
    Sun square/quincunx Venus

    Mars square/quincunx Moon
    Mars square/quincunx Venus

    maybe even

    Saturn square/quincunx Moon
    Saturn square/quincunx Venus.

    The square and quincunx aspects can be undesirable and no fun.
    Basic psychology says we will avoid what we don't like.

    If we men, Sun, Saturn, Mars have one square and/or quincunx with the archetypal women in our chart (manifesting from our outlook into our reality), inner joy for a woman will not shine from our soul through our physical life/reality.

    We can choose the priesthood of some sort. That's one way not to choose a life with a woman. We can choose a man because there is less distress with that human.

    The gay/bi man does not want to be claustrophobic in a heterosexual marriage.

    We are social animals. If a woman is a source of a man's distress or displeasure, he either has just himself or another man.

    Narcissus has to be there, if there is to be love.
    And, if you come between a man who has chosen to go it alone,
    If you come between him and his reflection and he accept you,
    It is salvation.
    It is Christ.
    Christ is God.

    This type of man needs companionship. Be each other's companion.
    Amen
  • Delivis

    Posts: 2332

    Jan 26, 2013 1:06 AM GMT
    I would recommend using less pseudoscience and bullshit and maybe just try dating and go from there to find a good match with a guy.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 26, 2013 4:49 PM GMT
    Delivis saidI would recommend using less pseudoscience and bullshit and maybe just try dating and go from there to find a good match with a guy.


    Your recommendation is of insufficient value. Your use of insults and impolite language is not welcomed.

    You may like to argue and cuddle, but Global Astrology (the locational astrology work of Jim Lewis, then looking at Western Astrology, Chinese Astrology, and the remedies of Vedic Astrology)--Sacred Global Astrology does not deserve disrespect, especially from a homosexual/bisexual. Through Global Astrology, one learns basic human rights, worth, dignity, diversity appreciation, compassion, and it is a Christian tool of Salvation.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 26, 2013 10:25 PM GMT
    Delivis saidI would recommend using less pseudoscience and bullshit and maybe just try dating and go from there to find a good match with a guy.


    P.S. Delivis,

    My transit for today is Mercury opposition Ascendant. Some of the message for that transit is:

    At this time you will seek increased mental stimulation through contacts with others. As long as it doesn't get too acrimonious, you will enjoy repartee.
  • Delivis

    Posts: 2332

    Jan 28, 2013 10:08 PM GMT
    StephenOABC said
    Delivis saidI would recommend using less pseudoscience and bullshit and maybe just try dating and go from there to find a good match with a guy.


    Your recommendation is of insufficient value. Your use of insults and impolite language is not welcomed.

    You may like to argue and cuddle, but Global Astrology (the locational astrology work of Jim Lewis, then looking at Western Astrology, Chinese Astrology, and the remedies of Vedic Astrology)--Sacred Global Astrology does not deserve disrespect, especially from a homosexual/bisexual. Through Global Astrology, one learns basic human rights, worth, dignity, diversity appreciation, compassion, and it is a Christian tool of Salvation.


    Word salad doesnt do much to convince me. Solid empirical evidence does.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 01, 2013 3:27 AM GMT
    Astrology does not lack empirical evidence (direct observation).

    Some things are true even if they are not tested in double blind studies.

    Theoretical physics is a worthwhile field of study.

    From my reading about auras, I know some people do not have the personality for astrology. We can look at career counseling and see the same thing, one person would love to go into social work, another person may want to be a zoologist.

    No big deal. You can't be persuaded? I understand that is a limitation of yours. My limitations may keep me from being interested in what interests you.

    The Holographic Universe is a good book. Each of our incarnations is a hologram, a picture snapped of us when the objects in our Solar System were positioned just so. That picture, that hologram lasts as long as the lifetime of our incarnation.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 02, 2013 1:44 PM GMT
    Your recommendation is of insufficient value. Your use of insults and impolite language is not welcomed.