New Star Trek... anyone see it? Should I see it in 2d? 3d? Imax3d? so confused.

• dommyinlosang...
  
  Posts: 261
  
  
  May 13, 2013 4:39 AM GMT

  I read the 3d conversion is not that good. But the ship warping looks amazing in 3d. What about Imax? Is Imax3d better than regular 3d?
  
  It opens here on Wednesday but it's already opened in the UK, Australia and Germany.
  
  I love me some quinto spock
  
  

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• HottJoe
  
  Posts: 21366
  
  
  May 13, 2013 4:59 AM GMT

  If you're looking to see it in the theater, you might as well go with the 3D!

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  May 13, 2013 5:14 AM GMT

  Just a personal opinion. Never watch a post production 3D film. If it wasn't filmed in 3D it's not worth the time. They may claim 3D conversion has gotten better. But I wouldn't risk it. I like 3D movies but I'll never watch a post production 3D film.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  May 13, 2013 5:29 AM GMT

  I've seen it last Friday, I loved it...
  Is it converted to 3D? Didn't felt that way while I was watching.
  Personally, I felt it as one of the best 3D movies.
  

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• HottJoe
  
  Posts: 21366
  
  
  May 13, 2013 5:31 AM GMT

  Lo5t5oul5 saidJust a personal opinion. Never watch a post production 3D film. If it wasn't filmed in 3D it's not worth the time. They may claim 3D conversion has gotten better. But I wouldn't risk it. I like 3D movies but I'll never watch a post production 3D film.

  
  
  Is that what they did with Titanic? I never saw it when it was re-released in 3D, but I heard it looked pretty good.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  May 13, 2013 5:37 AM GMT

  HottJoe said

  Lo5t5oul5 saidJust a personal opinion. Never watch a post production 3D film. If it wasn't filmed in 3D it's not worth the time. They may claim 3D conversion has gotten better. But I wouldn't risk it. I like 3D movies but I'll never watch a post production 3D film.

  
  
  Is that what they did with Titanic? I never saw it when it was re-released in 3D, but I heard it looked pretty good.

  
  
  http://realorfake3d.com/

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• dommyinlosang...
  
  Posts: 261
  
  
  May 13, 2013 5:40 AM GMT

  thanks for the input guys... i ended up getting IMAX 3d tix... real imax... so hopefully that will work plus 30 minutes of the film was shot in imax...
  
  can't wait...
  
  i won tix in a contest to use on fandango and they are just costing me 6.50 each for the extras charges.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  May 13, 2013 11:08 AM GMT

  I can't wait for it to come out I will watch it at midnight if I can. I won't watch it in 3D though not worth 15 bucks in my opinion. plus i wear glasses and then i have to wear the 3D glasses over my glasses it's just a mess so yea I will pass on the 3D and watch in normal D.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• ChicagoSteve
  
  Posts: 1468
  
  
  May 13, 2013 11:31 AM GMT

  It opens in Chicago this Thursday, I can't wait! Based on how much I loved the previous film I might see it twice, once in regular version and then in 3D.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Destinharbor
  
  Posts: 4748
  
  
  May 13, 2013 4:53 PM GMT

  GUYS! Please post back after you see it in 3d and/or Imax. The difference in cost is pretty high and I just got raped by the Gatsby 3d. Looked totally cartoon.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• HottJoe
  
  Posts: 21366
  
  
  May 13, 2013 5:18 PM GMT

  I hope they show Captain Kirk in his boxers again.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• MarvelBoy23
  
  Posts: 284
  
  
  May 13, 2013 5:24 PM GMT

  HottJoe saidI hope they show Captain Kirk in his boxers again.

  
  
  
  Yes, please.
  
  Just watched the first on Friday in anticipation of this one. Movie looks super bad-ass!

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• ForeverNCMasc
  
  Posts: 5
  
  
  May 13, 2013 6:38 PM GMT

  I'm going to see it in IMAX3D and I can't wait! 4 years between movies is too long.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Aodhan
  
  Posts: 3833
  
  
  May 13, 2013 6:43 PM GMT

  it was epic in 3D!

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• gwuinsf
  
  Posts: 525
  
  
  May 13, 2013 8:11 PM GMT

  I avoid 3D when I can. I think it's a big ripoff and I don't find my enjoyment of the movie to be any better. The sole exception being Avatar.
  
  I think it's the movie industry's way of ripping you out of $5 more.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• HndsmKansan
  
  Posts: 16386
  
  
  May 13, 2013 8:18 PM GMT

  I'll absolutely go! Looking forward to it!
  
  

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• halfer230
  
  Posts: 16
  
  
  May 13, 2013 11:26 PM GMT

  spockspockspockspock oh and chris pine . . . i'll see it in all the d's.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  May 13, 2013 11:44 PM GMT

  I already have my ticket for Thursday night...

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• ChicagoSteve
  
  Posts: 1468
  
  
  May 14, 2013 12:07 AM GMT

  HottJoe saidI hope they show Captain Kirk in his boxers again.

  
  
  Yes! Chris Pine is just so incredibly sexy!

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  May 15, 2013 7:01 AM GMT

  Lo5t5oul5 saidJust a personal opinion. Never watch a post production 3D film. If it wasn't filmed in 3D it's not worth the time. They may claim 3D conversion has gotten better. But I wouldn't risk it. I like 3D movies but I'll never watch a post production 3D film.

  
  
  This! After the Avatar hype, I saw Sanctum and Wrath of the Titans in 3D and it wasn't worth it (Titans sucked btw). I don't have any intentions in seeing Star Trek in 3D, but I have to admit that there are certain movies that would warrant a look in 3D. Jurassic Park and Titanic are two of them.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• RaggedyMan
  
  Posts: 7200
  
  
  May 15, 2013 7:11 AM GMT

  Great movie. No need for 3d. Very enjoyable.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  May 15, 2013 7:32 AM GMT

  For all trekkies all the director did was rip parts from every other movie and series and hash something together for the movie. Its not a new story and a cop out to bringing anything new. Only people who have watched all of trek will pick up these undertones.
  
  Have in mind JJ doesnt like trek and it was just a step for him to get the Star wars contract.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  May 15, 2013 7:37 AM GMT

  Not a 3D buff. I prefer good acting, story, and CGI. I care nothing about 3D. I hope its a good film....
  
  We will soon find out.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• dommyinlosang...
  
  Posts: 261
  
  
  May 19, 2013 11:28 PM GMT

  6 of us went... the imax was awesome... 3d was really good... i totally loved it... it was just fast and funny and was a blast. have a few issues but what movie doesnt have issues.
  
  i was pooped afterwards... it's sort of non stop
  
  we all loved it... definitely gonna see it again
  
  

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• rnch
  
  Posts: 11556
  
  
  May 19, 2013 11:54 PM GMT

  sanjose408 saidGreat movie. No need for 3d. Very enjoyable.

  
  
  
  
  agree.
  
  Viewed it last night, in 3-D (My man screwed up buying the tickets).
  
  Next time no 3-D.
  
  My only gripe is: NO shitless scenes of Chris Pine (Captan Kirk).

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM