Obama Scandals Bring MSNBC 7-Year Low While Fox News Rises

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 21, 2013 3:54 PM GMT
    The scandals of the Obama administration seem to be hurting not just the White House but MSNBC as well, while Fox News Channel has just scored its second-best week of the year.

    http://www.deadline.com/2013/05/obama-msnbc-fox-news-scandals/
  • rnch

    Posts: 11524

    May 21, 2013 4:09 PM GMT
    votz yer pernt, southbitch-in-hiding icon_question.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 21, 2013 4:14 PM GMT
    rnch saidvotz yer pernt, southbitch-in-hiding icon_question.gif

    This.
    Plus, FuxNews viewers are racists and stupid. It's not like anyone really cares what the typical trailer park residing, moonshine drinking inbred cares about anyway.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 21, 2013 4:24 PM GMT
    smartmoney said
    rnch saidvotz yer pernt, southbitch-in-hiding icon_question.gif

    This.
    Plus, FuxNews viewers are racists and stupid. It's not like anyone really cares what the typical trailer park residing, moonshine drinking inbred cares about anyway.


    It surprises me then that you don't watch Fox News.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 21, 2013 4:28 PM GMT
    smartmoney said
    rnch saidvotz yer pernt, southbitch-in-hiding icon_question.gif

    This.
    Plus, FuxNews viewers are racists and stupid. It's not like anyone really cares what the typical trailer park residing, moonshine drinking inbred cares about anyway.


    I watch/listen to Fox News as regularly as I can and I don't much care for moonshine and don't live in a trailer park as best I can tell.

    The point of your name calling is?
  • rnch

    Posts: 11524

    May 21, 2013 4:40 PM GMT
    freedomisntfree said
    smartmoney said
    rnch saidvotz yer pernt, southbitch-in-hiding icon_question.gif

    This.
    Plus, FuxNews viewers are racists and stupid. It's not like anyone really cares what the typical trailer park residing, moonshine drinking inbred cares about anyway.


    I watch/listen to Fox News as regularly as I can....





    Your viewing habits are proven by your threads and replies here on RJ.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 21, 2013 4:45 PM GMT
    rnch said
    freedomisntfree said
    smartmoney said
    rnch saidvotz yer pernt, southbitch-in-hiding icon_question.gif

    This.
    Plus, FuxNews viewers are racists and stupid. It's not like anyone really cares what the typical trailer park residing, moonshine drinking inbred cares about anyway.


    I watch/listen to Fox News as regularly as I can....





    Your viewing habits are proven by your threads and replies here on RJ.


    Such as this most recent one?

    http://www.realjock.com/gayforums/3207654

    How so?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 21, 2013 5:11 PM GMT
    smartmoney said
    rnch saidvotz yer pernt, southbitch-in-hiding icon_question.gif

    This.
    Plus, FuxNews viewers are racists and stupid. It's not like anyone really cares what the typical trailer park residing, moonshine drinking inbred cares about anyway.


    Generalize much? LOL

    Got any opinions about blacks?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 21, 2013 9:55 PM GMT
    CharleyChase90232 said
    smartmoney said
    rnch saidvotz yer pernt, southbitch-in-hiding icon_question.gif

    This.
    Plus, FuxNews viewers are racists and stupid. It's not like anyone really cares what the typical trailer park residing, moonshine drinking inbred cares about anyway.


    Generalize much? LOL

    Got any opinions about blacks?


    Not that it would matter personally to you since you're not black.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 21, 2013 10:10 PM GMT
    MSNBC and Fox News are both the extreme networks. I look down upon people who watch either.

    You have to have stations to fire up the base and both of them do just that.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 21, 2013 10:31 PM GMT
    Great - a bogus Black barking faux Fox facts. It doesn't get any more US Right Wing than that. icon_razz.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 22, 2013 12:37 AM GMT
    msuNdc saidMSNBC and Fox News are both the extreme networks. I look down upon people who watch either.

    You have to have stations to fire up the base and both of them do just that.


    BUT HERE'S ONE BIG DIFFERENCE

    I first read this story "Obama Scandals Bring MSNBC 7-Year Low While Fox News Rises"

    on THE MSNBC site!

    Do you think FOX would have posted reported a similar story about FOX losing numbers to MSNBC?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 22, 2013 1:28 AM GMT
    I think its probably because they have that awful Rachel Maddow clone Chris Hays on now.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 22, 2013 1:29 AM GMT
    ART_DECO saidGreat - a bogus Black barking faux Fox facts. It doesn't get any more US Right Wing than that. icon_razz.gif


    believe whatever you want OLD FOOOOOOOOL!
  • musclmed

    Posts: 3284

    May 22, 2013 2:14 AM GMT
    smartmoney said
    rnch saidvotz yer pernt, southbitch-in-hiding icon_question.gif

    This.
    Plus, FuxNews viewers are racists and stupid. It's not like anyone really cares what the typical trailer park residing, moonshine drinking inbred cares about anyway.


    tell us how you really feel.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 22, 2013 2:47 PM GMT
    Unintended said
    CharleyChase90232 said
    ART_DECO saidGreat - a bogus Black barking faux Fox facts. It doesn't get any more US Right Wing than that. icon_razz.gif


    believe whatever you want OLD FOOOOOOOOL!


    Ageism is as bad as racism, you (fill in the blank).


    He's old.

    And he's a fool.

    How you are going into making that into an 'ism makes no sense.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 22, 2013 3:24 PM GMT
    Why focus on scandals is unlikely to backfire on GOP as in 1998

    http://washingtonexaminer.com/five-reasons-why-focus-on-scandals-is-unlikely-to-backfire-on-gop-as-in-1998/article/2530215
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 22, 2013 3:47 PM GMT
    riddler78 saidWhy focus on scandals is unlikely to backfire on GOP as in 1998

    http://washingtonexaminer.com/five-reasons-why-focus-on-scandals-is-unlikely-to-backfire-on-gop-as-in-1998/article/2530215


    What backfire? Republicans remained in power in both the Senate and House afterwards. So much for a "backfire".

    No comparison.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 22, 2013 4:00 PM GMT
    msuNdc said
    riddler78 saidWhy focus on scandals is unlikely to backfire on GOP as in 1998

    http://washingtonexaminer.com/five-reasons-why-focus-on-scandals-is-unlikely-to-backfire-on-gop-as-in-1998/article/2530215


    What backfire? Republicans remained in power in both the Senate and House afterwards. So much for a "backfire".

    No comparison.


    Clinton left office with I think around a 62% approval rating. It's not that Clinton didn't break a few laws, including perjury, which if memory serves me right, included losing his bar ticket in two states and a $750,000 fine.

    I think the high approval rating represented the public's disgust at both the criminalization of politics and the over intrusiveness of the federal government.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 22, 2013 4:07 PM GMT
    freedomisntfree said
    msuNdc said
    riddler78 saidWhy focus on scandals is unlikely to backfire on GOP as in 1998

    http://washingtonexaminer.com/five-reasons-why-focus-on-scandals-is-unlikely-to-backfire-on-gop-as-in-1998/article/2530215


    What backfire? Republicans remained in power in both the Senate and House afterwards. So much for a "backfire".

    No comparison.


    Clinton left office with I think around a 62% approval rating. It's not that Clinton didn't break a few laws, including perjury, which if memory serves me right, included losing his bar ticket in two states and a $750,000 fine.

    I think the high approval rating represented the public's disgust at both the criminalization of politics and the over intrusiveness of the federal government.


    Or the correlation between how the economy and country is feeling ties into the President's approval rating. When Bush first came to the White House he had a ridiculous approval rating. Two wars, an economic downturn later spiraled that number down.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 22, 2013 4:23 PM GMT
    msuNdc said
    freedomisntfree said
    msuNdc said
    riddler78 saidWhy focus on scandals is unlikely to backfire on GOP as in 1998

    http://washingtonexaminer.com/five-reasons-why-focus-on-scandals-is-unlikely-to-backfire-on-gop-as-in-1998/article/2530215


    What backfire? Republicans remained in power in both the Senate and House afterwards. So much for a "backfire".

    No comparison.


    Clinton left office with I think around a 62% approval rating. It's not that Clinton didn't break a few laws, including perjury, which if memory serves me right, included losing his bar ticket in two states and a $750,000 fine.

    I think the high approval rating represented the public's disgust at both the criminalization of politics and the over intrusiveness of the federal government.


    Or the correlation between how the economy and country is feeling ties into the President's approval rating. When Bush first came to the White House he had a ridiculous approval rating. Two wars, an economic downturn later spiraled that number down.


    All true, and then Bush's retrospective approval rating comes back up when compared with successor when the public realizes that it ain't 'no bed of roses'. The presidency is an almost impossibly difficult job regardless of who is the current occupant.

    "When Bush first came to the White House he had a ridiculous approval rating"

    Actually that was in the aftermath of 9-11
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 22, 2013 4:29 PM GMT
    freedomisntfree said
    msuNdc said
    freedomisntfree said
    msuNdc said
    riddler78 saidWhy focus on scandals is unlikely to backfire on GOP as in 1998

    http://washingtonexaminer.com/five-reasons-why-focus-on-scandals-is-unlikely-to-backfire-on-gop-as-in-1998/article/2530215


    What backfire? Republicans remained in power in both the Senate and House afterwards. So much for a "backfire".

    No comparison.


    Clinton left office with I think around a 62% approval rating. It's not that Clinton didn't break a few laws, including perjury, which if memory serves me right, included losing his bar ticket in two states and a $750,000 fine.

    I think the high approval rating represented the public's disgust at both the criminalization of politics and the over intrusiveness of the federal government.


    Or the correlation between how the economy and country is feeling ties into the President's approval rating. When Bush first came to the White House he had a ridiculous approval rating. Two wars, an economic downturn later spiraled that number down.


    All true, and then Bush's retrospective approval rating comes back up when compared with successor when the public realizes that it ain't 'no bed of roses'. The presidency is an almost impossibly difficult job regardless of who is the current occupant.

    "When Bush first came to the White House he had a ridiculous approval rating"

    Actually that was in the aftermath of 9-11


    At least 49% are going to hate you and wish ill towards you and hope you screw up. I saw it with Bush and I see it with Obama. Sad that Americans take such pride in watching the other party fail than wishing for them to help correct some of the obstacles we face.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 22, 2013 4:43 PM GMT
    Red is dead. Faux News is just the after-echo.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 22, 2013 5:10 PM GMT
    Why has MSNBC sunk so low in the ratings?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 22, 2013 6:24 PM GMT
    msuNdc said
    freedomisntfree said
    msuNdc said
    freedomisntfree said
    msuNdc said
    riddler78 saidWhy focus on scandals is unlikely to backfire on GOP as in 1998

    http://washingtonexaminer.com/five-reasons-why-focus-on-scandals-is-unlikely-to-backfire-on-gop-as-in-1998/article/2530215


    What backfire? Republicans remained in power in both the Senate and House afterwards. So much for a "backfire".

    No comparison.


    Clinton left office with I think around a 62% approval rating. It's not that Clinton didn't break a few laws, including perjury, which if memory serves me right, included losing his bar ticket in two states and a $750,000 fine.

    I think the high approval rating represented the public's disgust at both the criminalization of politics and the over intrusiveness of the federal government.


    Or the correlation between how the economy and country is feeling ties into the President's approval rating. When Bush first came to the White House he had a ridiculous approval rating. Two wars, an economic downturn later spiraled that number down.


    All true, and then Bush's retrospective approval rating comes back up when compared with successor when the public realizes that it ain't 'no bed of roses'. The presidency is an almost impossibly difficult job regardless of who is the current occupant.

    "When Bush first came to the White House he had a ridiculous approval rating"

    Actually that was in the aftermath of 9-11


    At least 49% are going to hate you and wish ill towards you and hope you screw up. I saw it with Bush and I see it with Obama. Sad that Americans take such pride in watching the other party fail than wishing for them to help correct some of the obstacles we face.


    I guess it takes having our 2nd two tallest buildings blown up and thousands killed before we can come together as a nation and even then it's only for a few weeks. I'm actually quite surprised that we are still together as a nation after appx 240 years of this.