NO GAYS FOR A DAY DAY, (L.A. Times, Nov-14-08)

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 17, 2008 3:49 AM GMT
    L.A. Times
    No Gays for a Day day
    Joel Stein, Nov. 14, 5:25 p.m.
    UPDATE: No Gays For A Day has been officially changed to Dec 10. It turns out another guy was working on the same idea, and he's gay, and produced the Lifetime movie "Wedding Wars," and there's no way I'm going to get in a fight with a guy who's both gay and willing to work for Lifetime. He's willing to do anything. For further details see JoinTheImpact.com.
    - Joel Stein, Nov. 14, 5:25 p.m.
    __________________

    You wouldn't think gay people would need tips on staging a splashy event from Mexican immigrants. Yet since they lost the right to marry in California, gays appear to have no game plan, marching around West Hollywood and Silver Lake with their old "No on 8" signs, which makes about as much sense as holding a John McCain rally next month at John McCain's house.

    That's why I'm declaring Dec. 5 No Gays for a Day day. Patterned after the 2006 Great American Boycott organized by Latino immigrants, on that Friday, gays should stay home from work, school and do no shopping, to prove how crucial they are to American society. No Gays for a Day will demonstrate what it would be like if -- as so much of the non-coastal U.S. seems to desire -- gays just disappeared. You may not even know who all your daily gays are, so there's no predicting the impact. It probably won't shut down the restaurant industry like the immigrants did, but know this for certain: Dec. 5 will be a day that fashion does not move forward.

    To gauge this strategy's effectiveness, I called Sonja Eddings Brown, the spokesperson for the Protect Marriage coalition that put Proposition 8 -- which defined marriage as exclusively heterosexual -- on the ballot. Brown, to my surprise, sounded defeated. I reminded her that Proposition 8 passed, so maybe she should pep up a bit. "Did we win?" she asked. "It doesn't feel like it." When I ran No Gays for a Day by her, Brown said, "I have so many dear friends who are such invaluable parts of this city and California who are gay." It was the boldest use of "some of my best friends are ... " I had ever heard.

    My main concern about enacting my plan is that I'm not gay. And my previous attempt as an outsider to rally folks to a cause was a miserable failure: Right before I applied to college, I suggested Asian students protest being stereotyped as overachievers by skipping the SAT.

    Also, I'm really lazy. So I called Amy Balliett for help. Balliett is a lesbian in Seattle who, just last Friday, created JoinTheImpact.com, which has organized an expected 250,000 people nationwide to march Saturday in protest of Proposition 8. Balliett immediately embraced No Gays for a Day as JoinTheImpact's second event. We worked out some kinks, like "pretending you are sick" for people who aren't out of the closet at work. For economic impact, we picked a Friday -- one of the big shopping days before Christmas and the day People, Us Weekly and Star usually sell out at newsstands. We also decided that because this is a general strike, not a directed boycott, even gay-owned, gay-patronized businesses should shut down. "I hate to say this, but we should even say, 'Don't even go out to the bars,' " she said. "I just don't know if the community can stick to that."

    To get media attention, Balliett -- a search-engine marketer -- is going to use the social networking sites she used for Saturday's march. Although that sounded promising, I decided to hunt for a No Gays for a Day celebrity spokesperson. I chose Kathy Griffin because she's so well connected to the gay community and because it's hard to get Ellen DeGeneres on the phone at 10 p.m. when you're drinking and coming up with ideas like No Gays for a Day.

    Griffin -- who is a spokesperson for the Foundation for AIDS Research, AIDS Project Los Angeles, Aid for AIDS and, I'm guessing, AIDS, AIDS, AIDS -- was thrilled to get the official celebrity spokesperson job. And she thought our impact would be significant. "Forget Pinkberry. It's over for them. They could go under in one day," she said. "If you do two days without gays, Bravo would go under too." People, we figure, will have no assistance at libraries or gym class and will madly butcher their hair. Subaru dealerships shouldn't bother opening. Entertainment journalism will take such a hit, TMZ will have to report hockey scores.

    Griffin was getting more excited about our plan until I mentioned this might slow up the remodel of her house. "My remodel? What about the audience for my shows? The only reason I'm doing this is on Dec. 5, I don't have a show. I'd never do this if I had a show that day in Palm Desert,"
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 17, 2008 3:54 AM GMT
    A day? The Jesus freaks of the Latter day Saints will most likely go out and buy more shit that day...we need more than a day. We need an all gay, nation-wide boycott of everything and anything not essential to living.

    * exceptions are gay friendly and gay owned businesses that we like to and want to support.

    Our buying power alone is instrumental to the health US economy.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 17, 2008 4:03 AM GMT
    I think it's a good idea, and the column is pretty clever.
  • phill

    Posts: 117

    Nov 17, 2008 4:50 AM GMT
    msw1 saidA day? The Jesus freaks of the Latter day Saints will most likely go out and buy more shit that day...we need more than a day. We need an all gay, nation-wide boycott of everything and anything not essential to living.

    * exceptions are gay friendly and gay owned businesses that we like to and want to support.

    Our buying power alone is instrumental to the health US economy.


    I agree. I think it is ludicrous to only do one day of shopping less. It is a whatif type of threat that holds no great lasting impact. We should all be conscious consumers for the long run. It will get ride of some of the most ridiculous stereotypes of the gay culture as frivolous spenders as well as help our cause.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 17, 2008 1:23 PM GMT
    Again with this topic????
    For God's sake....