theantijock saidI don't see this yet on http://www.blogactive.com/
How does Rogers function? Does he first float the idea in public to see if something surfaces or does he have evidence (I would presume), then floats a balloon and sees if the outed comes clean before furnishing evidence?
I would say it's likely he doesn't have any real evidence, and that he just floated the idea in the hopes that radical lefties (like the person who started this topic) will just repeat it.
Great way to destroy a person's life.
Hi Southbeach. This is not the first time you've been a user towards me. I told you the first time that I don't appreciate that and I haven't learned to like it since.
Ask yourself which the more admirable character: revealing possibly substantiated hypocrisy (time will tell us) of someone with a known history of harming us, or using someone's innocent post to try and harm a third party?
What made you think that wouldn't backfire, insert rhetorical question mark here---->?
Besides that you would counterfeit yourself as responding to my question, all the while using my inquiry to wrongly berate a gentleman who did nothing to you, your suggestion that someone known (correctly or not) as gay destroys that person's life doesn't speak to a very high opinion of being gay.
What if someone was denouncing rich people, making discriminatory laws against them, and then it was uncovered--possibly a balloon was floated revealing--that person was rich, would that destroy that person's life too?
We do not appreciate your using Gay in the derogatory. This is a gay forum, after all, have some decorum.
The only thing destroying that person's life is that person's own decisions and actions to cause us pain. Preventing him from that is not destroying; it is a chance for that person to rebuild.