cut vs uncut

  • RainBow_Drago...

    Posts: 337

    Jan 04, 2014 5:00 PM GMT
    So I was circumcised as a child and I'm not exactly happy about it icon_mad.gif mainly because I read that uncut men have more sensation and overall better sex then cut men. is this true?

    circumcision-of-the-christ.jpg
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 04, 2014 5:08 PM GMT
    We are born uncut , that foreskin is here for a reason , why humans are always messing up with nature's creations icon_sad.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 04, 2014 5:22 PM GMT
    RainBow_Dragon2000 said...I read that uncut men have more sensation and overall better sex then cut men. is this true?


    SB will be with you in a moment.

    I don't know personally, cut in the tradition; but from what I've read on these types of threads, it seems that the guys who declare their body mutilated--you know, right before they pierce their face--who did not get voluntarily cut as an adult are the ones who claim more sensation. However, the guys who got cut as adults don't seem to report having had better sex or now having less sensation. So I tend to believe the guys who seem to know, not the guys who seem to imagine.

    Anyone cut as an adult who differs feel free to report and I'll take that into account, but that's from what I've read from those who already have, whose reports I've happened to see.

    Put your one hand out. Now with your other hand take a finger and rub one finger. Now rub two fingers. Now three. Other than knowing that you're rubbing three fingers instead of one, does your brain seriously pick up three times the sensation?

    Now cut off one finger--that's a hypothetical, by the way. Now simultaneously cut off two. Do you seriously think cutting off the one finger will cause less pain than the two? I'm not volunteering but I seriously doubt it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 04, 2014 5:31 PM GMT
    theantijock said
    RainBow_Dragon2000 said...I read that uncut men have more sensation and overall better sex then cut men. is this true?


    SB will be with you in a moment.

    I don't know personally, cut in the tradition; but from what I've read on these types of threads, it seems that the guys who declare their body mutilated--you know, right before they pierce their face--who did not get voluntarily cut as an adult are the ones who claim more sensation. However, the guys who got cut as adults don't seem to report having had better sex or now having less sensation. So I tend to believe the guys who seem to know, not the guys who seem to imagine.

    Anyone cut as an adult who differs feel free to report and I'll take that into account, but that's from what I've read from those who already have, whose reports I've happened to see.

    Put your one hand out. Now with your other hand take a finger and rub one finger. Now rub two fingers. Now three. Other than knowing that you're rubbing three fingers instead of one, does your brain seriously pick up three times the sensation?

    Now cut off one finger--that's a hypothetical, by the way. Now simultaneously cut off two. Do you seriously think cutting off the one finger will cause less pain than the two? I'm not volunteering but I seriously doubt it.


    I tend to disagree about the sensation part of your answer . We uncut have more sensation , and the reason is that we have our gland protected from any kind of rubbing as the foreskin protects it . Also when it comes to masturbation , you have the advantage of not needing lube .
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 04, 2014 5:42 PM GMT
    neffa saidI tend to disagree about the sensation part of your answer . We uncut have more sensation , and the reason is that we have our gland protected from any kind of rubbing as the foreskin protects it . Also when it comes to masturbation , you have the advantage of not needing lube .


    I don't know the difference as an adult so I only have the opinions of those who got cut as adults. So your argument is not with me but with what they might report in either direction. All I did just now is to report what I've read.

    Those are the guys who would know, not you and not me. And that's assuming that they truly have that clarity of mind to know the difference between their own sensing and their interpreting through all the filters of their psychology.

    You saying you have more sensation might not make it so and even if it did, might not make it relevant. Most of sex takes place in the brain. You don't require putting your entire palm on the keyboard, a finger tip will tell the brain you're there and the brain does the rest.

    Just as optical illusions work on perception. You don't have to see even the entirety for the brain to piece it together and present to the mind an entire scene that the eye doesn't even see.

    As to requiring lube to masturbate? I have no idea what you are talking about.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 04, 2014 5:53 PM GMT
    neffa said...We uncut have more sensation , and the reason is that we have our gland protected from any kind of rubbing as the foreskin protects it ...


    And PS, that's actually not true especially because you can be both Euro-cut (that's just my word for it, meaning not very cut) but also you could be completely cut but a grower not a show-er, in which case while flaccid, ya turtle, so the glans is just as sheathed as an uncut guy.

    So that's bullshit too.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 04, 2014 5:55 PM GMT
    I was actually thinking of uncut bread versus cut bread for peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.

    icon_redface.gif I must feast soon.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 04, 2014 6:02 PM GMT
    Soulasphyxi saidI was actually thinking of uncut bread versus cut bread for peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.

    icon_redface.gif I must feast soon.


    Oh, I am very particular with my cut breads. For instance. I never ever cut a peanut butter sandwich. They must be eaten whole. Whereas a tuna sandwich, I always do a center cut parallel to one of the sides. But a melted cheese sandwich never tastes quite right unless it is cut on the diagonal.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 04, 2014 9:29 PM GMT
    ikilledcaptainplanet said...i don't appreciate how there's this notion out here where having foreskin is "unnatural"...


    Can you cite one post in all of the internet where anyone ever said as you've just implied people say that "foreskin is 'unnatural'"?

    What I find odd is how those who tout natural probably don't even shop Wholefoods, but do pierce their eyebrows and never bitch about a mother piercing the ears for her baby's diamond studs. What are you people, Penis Vegans?

    PS. Looks like this thread was moved to sexual health, where threads go to die. No flowers please. Make donations payable to the National Cut/Uncut Debating Society.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 05, 2014 11:37 PM GMT
    theantijock said
    Soulasphyxi saidI was actually thinking of uncut bread versus cut bread for peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.

    icon_redface.gif I must feast soon.


    Oh, I am very particular with my cut breads. For instance. I never ever cut a peanut butter sandwich. They must be eaten whole. Whereas a tuna sandwich, I always do a center cut parallel to one of the sides. But a melted cheese sandwich never tastes quite right unless it is cut on the diagonal.


    I believe the crust is a sign of my maturity. When I was 18- I would refuse to eat sandwiches that still had to crust on it. 18+ I absolutely must devour the whole thing. icon_evil.gif