Crime & Punishment in SWEDEN

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 13, 2014 7:56 PM GMT

    The reason this post is blank is in response to the judicial system in Sweden....completely blank and void of any substance whatsoever.


    In the not so distant future, the government of Sweden will regret their stupidity by allowing Muslims to enter their country without ANY background checks.
    Sadly, it's the citizens of Sweden who will suffer the most!!






    Stupidity should NOT be rewarded.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 13, 2014 8:00 PM GMT
    Zzzzzzzz
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 13, 2014 8:08 PM GMT
    Please note that Swedish prisons are overrun with MUSLIMS fro the simple reason that the Swedes have stupidly granted citizenship to those seeking political asylum. This is a joke... they have come to Sweden to wreck havoc and ruin they're once pristine country. They even "convert" to Christianity so that they CANNOT be deported after robbing a bank, liquor store....or KILLING someone.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 13, 2014 8:37 PM GMT

    "As Sweden does not believe in the death penalty, there is no such thing as murder in the course of self defense."

    Well, this says otherwise: [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-defense_(Sweden)[/url]


    "The interpretation of what is to be considered not "blatantly unjustifiable" is popularly expressed in Sweden as "that force which is required by the peril". In other words, the defending party may do whatever it takes so long as no alternative, less severe options are available (except fleeing the immediate area NJA 1969 p425, 1999 p460). The expression "blatantly unjustifiable" allows fairly generous tolerance towards the defending party.
    However, the defending party must also consider that which is defended and what injury is inflicted upon the attacker. If that which is defended is insignificant in comparison to the injuries to the attacker, the court may reject the claim that person acted in self-defense since the damage done to the attacker is "blatantly unjustifiable". Loss of life or permanent bodily injury is rarely justified as self-defense unless the defending party was in danger of being subjected to the same.
    For example, if the only way of stopping a criminal from escaping with stolen property would be by killing them, then it would not be justifiable to do so. This is because that which is defended (property) is not as valuable as a human life and therefore the action of killing the criminal is not justifiable.
    Subjective peril[edit]
    Swedish legal custom in regards to self-defense states that peril is subjective. This means that the peril is measured from what the defending party perceived as peril and not the actual peril.
    For example, if a person were to threaten someone with an unloaded gun (not an actual lethal threat), the defending party would not be convicted if defending themselves as if the gun were loaded (a lethal threat). This is because the defending party may perceive the gun as loaded and thus lethal.
    Excess[edit]
    A person who commits acts which are "blatantly unjustifiable" while in peril may also escape conviction if the situation were such that the person "could not be expected to maintain control of himself". For instance, such a situation might be if the defending party were in a state of great fear or severe rage because of the peril.
    Defense of others[edit]
    The Swedish criminal code states that anyone who assists a defending party in peril shall have the same rights as the defending party.
  • Import

    Posts: 7193

    Jan 13, 2014 8:50 PM GMT
    Why should I give a shit?


  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 13, 2014 9:01 PM GMT
    The OP has clearly flipped.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 13, 2014 10:23 PM GMT
    In reply to MenInLove:

    The fact remains, in THIS case, that the defendant was rendered completely incapable of defending himself, as he lay on the floor with at least ONE puncture wound that perforated his lung.
    AND taking into consideration that the perp had already killed a Catholic Priest, there is NO reason to suggest that he would not have killed the defendant.


    "For example, if the only way of stopping a criminal from escaping with stolen property would be by killing them, then it would not be justifiable to do so. This is because that which is defended (property) is not as valuable as a human life and therefore the action of killing the criminal is not justifiable.
    Subjective peril[edit]
    Swedish legal custom in regards to self-defense states that peril is subjective. This means that the peril is measured from what the defending party perceived as peril and not the actual peril.
    For example, if a person were to threaten someone with an unloaded gun (not an actual lethal threat), the defending party would not be convicted if defending themselves as if the gun were loaded (a lethal threat). This is because the defending party may perceive the gun as loaded and thus lethal.
    Excess[edit]
    A person who commits acts which are "blatantly unjustifiable" while in peril may also escape conviction if the situation were such that the person "could not be expected to maintain control of himself". For instance, such a situation might be if the defending party were in a state of great fear or severe rage because of the peril.
    Defense of others[edit]
    The Swedish criminal code states that anyone who assists a defending party in peril shall have the same rights as the defending party.[/quote]
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 13, 2014 10:25 PM GMT
    Whatever.

    Vote for me for MOTD!!! It's what your friend would have wanted!!!
  • Import

    Posts: 7193

    Jan 13, 2014 10:26 PM GMT
    OP instead of posting your shit on this particular website geared toward gay men's health and fitness. Perhaps u should be ranting in another capacity that would be more effective. You know....like in Sweden or something?

  • Import

    Posts: 7193

    Jan 13, 2014 10:26 PM GMT
    jmusmc85 saidWhatever.

    Vote for me for MOTD!!! It's what your friend would have wanted!!!

    lolz. icon_lol.gif

    yesss
  • Import

    Posts: 7193

    Jan 13, 2014 10:35 PM GMT
    FriendsOnly said
    Import saidOP instead of posting your shit on this particular website geared toward gay men's health and fitness. Perhaps u should be ranting in another capacity that would be more effective. You know....like in Sweden or something?



    I do it for the sole purpose of pissing off little punks like you. Get back in your sandbox, little boy.

    well regardless. you're the one who seems pissed off.
    I win.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 13, 2014 10:53 PM GMT
    You sound completely unhinged, butterball.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 13, 2014 10:58 PM GMT
    FriendsOnly said
    jmusmc85 saidWhatever.

    Vote for me for MOTD!!! It's what your friend would have wanted!!!


    5'5" tall and weighing 135 lbs. ??? You ARE kidding right ??


    And so?

    What's it to you meatball?icon_lol.gif

    Get it? Swedish meatball!!!icon_surprised.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 16, 2014 9:07 PM GMT
    Fuck you, Import and that Shark lady, too...and yeah, the little taco bender.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 16, 2014 10:19 PM GMT

    So what was the outcome? It's been three days since the trial...

    -intrigued
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 21, 2014 11:03 PM GMT
    FriendsOnly saidI will reply in private.... I DONE with the assholes on this site who stick their noses into my business.
    BTW...who said the trail would last only ONE day ???


    icon_eek.gif