US Vice President Joe Biden commits embarassing Poland gaffe

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 3:25 PM GMT
    Heh.

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/03/18/Biden-Commits-Embarrassing-Poland-Gaffe
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 3:50 PM GMT
    Figures you would quote the discredited Brietbart to slam our US Vice-President. At least gives you a break from your marathon 300+ posts attacking Obamacare. Here's just one of your threads which alone contains several hundred of your attacks against Obamacare:

    http://www.realjock.com/gayforums/3605921

    As a Canadian with alleged business ties to Hong Kong it does bring into question what your motivations are for this anti-US Administration mania. Can you explain it?

    Why has this become your obsession? These aren't simple discussions, like others here from Canada and elsewhere outside the US have on RJ, but a relentless spamming of negative political propaganda.

    I said here last year that I noted you were posting a political link every MINUTE for nearly an hour. That's impossible to do, if you're actually researching, visiting & reading these sites yourself. And what kind of employment can you have if you can be spamming political issues all day long, along with a proportionally infrequent post of a non-political nature? So what's the story here?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 3:55 PM GMT
    ART_DECO saidFigures you would quote the discredited Brietbart to slam our US Vice-President. At least gives you a break from your marathon 300+ posts attacking Obamacare.

    As a Canadian with alleged business ties to Hong Kong it does bring into question what your motivations are for this anti-US Administration mania. Can you explain it?

    Why has this become your obsession? These aren't simple discussions, like others here from Canada and elsewhere outside the US have on RJ, but a relentless spamming of negative political propaganda.

    I said here last year that I noted you were posting a political link every MINUTE for nearly an hour. That's impossible to do, if you're actually researching, visiting & reading these sites yourself. And what kind of employment can you have if you can be spamming political issues all day long, along with a rare post of a non-political nature? So what's the story here?


    Yes I can, and I did. Repeatedly. As an American who is clearly old, can you explain why you have such a low level of reading comprehension? What's the story there? Also what's the story behind your racism as I have asked elsewhere?

    As for your claim that I posted a political link every minute for an hour, I call bullshit. As someone who is clearly not tech savvy, you may not be aware of blogreaders which I have also pointed out to you repeatedly - many of my posts come from there if I think they are of interest.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 3:56 PM GMT
    What is actually embarrassing is that Jesse Helms was ever chair of an important committee.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 3:56 PM GMT
    Fyi:
    http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/middle-east-north-africa/201100-biden-misspeaks-about-chairmanship-and-nato
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 3:59 PM GMT
    riddler78 said
    As for your claim that I posted a political link every minute for an hour, I call bullshit. As someone who is clearly not tech savvy, you may not be aware of blogreaders which I have also pointed out to you repeatedly - many of my posts come from there if I think they are of interest.

    Not BS, the evidence of the time/date stamp was there. There were even instances of 2 posts made in the same minute, and I wasn't the only one who saw that and confirmed it.

    And I know you made the claim at the time of using feeds. Problem is, you couldn't have had the time to read those lengthy articles before posting them. And that's blind spamming.

    What was most revealing was that some of them had comments attached. Meaning you had researched them, read them, linked them, posted them here, and created a comment, all under 60 seconds. I said at the time your abilities were "miraculous".
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 4:03 PM GMT
    ART_DECO said
    riddler78 said
    As for your claim that I posted a political link every minute for an hour, I call bullshit. As someone who is clearly not tech savvy, you may not be aware of blogreaders which I have also pointed out to you repeatedly - many of my posts come from there if I think they are of interest.

    Not BS, the evidence of the time/date stamp was there. There were even instances of 2 posts made within 1 minute, and I wasn't the only one who saw that and confirmed it.

    And I know you made the claim at the time of using feeds. Problem is, you couldn't have had the time to read these lengthy articles before posting them. And that's blind spamming.


    Ah so now you change your argument. I assume that's an acknowledgement of your bullshit. I posted two posts within a minute so therefore I posted one a minute for an hour? Really? Also, have you heard of this wonderful app called "notepad"?

    It's really too bad that you don't really understand technology, math or really apparently the world around you. That's just stupidity and quite fortunately, not my concern. icon_wink.gif

    Oh you do realize it's a bit early in the day to start drinking so heavily? Incidentally, of my last 10 threads that I posted to or created, 7 weren't political.

    On the other hand, let's review your brand of crazy. Here's threads you stalked me on after which point you surprisingly disappeared:
    http://www.realjock.com/gayforums/3732808
    http://www.realjock.com/gayforums/3732774
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 4:07 PM GMT
    riddler78 said
    Oh you do realize it's a bit early in the day to start drinking so heavily?

    I wondered when you'd try an ad hominem attack on me. When you can't dispute the facts, go for the messenger.

    And you still haven't explained your many hundreds of Obamacare attacks from Canada. Several hundred in one thread alone that I linked above, which is like a monologue by you. Am I drunk about those, too?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 4:09 PM GMT
    ART_DECO said
    riddler78 said
    Oh you do realize it's a bit early in the day to start drinking so heavily?

    I wondered when you'd try an ad hominem attack on me. When you can't dispute the facts, go for the messenger.

    And you still haven't explained your many hundreds of Obamacare attacks from Canada. Am I drunk about those, too?


    It's a bit late for that given your repeated attacks on me as I've linked above. It's my only explanation for your bouts of hysteria for which you haven't bothered to comment on because you run away.

    What's the story behind that? And as for the "hundreds" of attacks on Obamacare? Try reading the thread and you'll see that there are fundamental problems to the act - that you otherwise wouldn't be aware of if you only tried looking at metta8's thread.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 4:10 PM GMT
    First reported by Bloomberg:
    http://go.bloomberg.com/political-capital/2014-03-18/bidens-gavel-gaffe-in-poland/
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 4:14 PM GMT
    riddler78 said
    And as for the "hundreds" of attacks on Obamacare? Try reading the thread and you'll see that there are fundamental problems to the act - that you otherwise wouldn't be aware of if you only tried looking at metta8's thread.

    And why are alleged problems with the ACA of any concern to YOU in Canada? That you have made it your obesssion, more than anyone else here including US citizens, putting hundreds of posts about it in just 1 thread, and countless more in other threads?

    That's the fact you keep evading, and refuse to explain. What is motivating you? Surely if you're this passionate about Obamacare you can share that with us, yes? And tell us what your personal stake is. Clearly it can't be a purely academic one.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 4:20 PM GMT
    ART_DECO said
    riddler78 said
    And as for the "hundreds" of attacks on Obamacare? Try reading the thread and you'll see that there are fundamental problems to the act - that you otherwise wouldn't be aware of if you only tried looking at metta8's thread.

    And why are alleged problems with the ACA of any concern to YOU in Canada? That you have made it your obesssion, more than anyone else here including US citizens, putting hundreds of posts about it in just 1 thread, and countless more in other threads?

    That's the fact you keep evading, and refuse to explain. What is motivating you? Surely if you're this passionate about Obamacare you can share that with us, yes? And tell us what your personal stake is.


    Because it's making the US less competitive particularly given that I do a considerable amount of business in the US. I've repeatedly explained like I did here:
    http://www.realjock.com/gayforums/3732774

    That's when you had the remarkable stupidity to claim that I didn't have a company in the US if you don't recall. I've posted when I've come across articles about Obamacare particularly referencing factual claims that cross my blogreader. I'm sure these are issues that that couldn't possibly concern you.

    You seem to confuse obsession with interest - but to each their own. What were you claiming about attacking the messenger? Your lack of self awareness is remarkable. But again, you're left with the fact that of my last 10 threads I posted to, 7 were not of a political nature.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 4:31 PM GMT
    ART_DECO saidFigures you would quote the discredited Brietbart to slam our US Vice-President. At least gives you a break from your marathon 300+ posts attacking Obamacare. Here's just one of your threads which alone contains several hundred of your attacks against Obamacare:

    http://www.realjock.com/gayforums/3605921

    As a Canadian with alleged business ties to Hong Kong it does bring into question what your motivations are for this anti-US Administration mania. Can you explain it?

    Why has this become your obsession? These aren't simple discussions, like others here from Canada and elsewhere outside the US have on RJ, but a relentless spamming of negative political propaganda.

    I said here last year that I noted you were posting a political link every MINUTE for nearly an hour. That's impossible to do, if you're actually researching, visiting & reading these sites yourself. And what kind of employment can you have if you can be spamming political issues all day long, along with a proportionally infrequent post of a non-political nature? So what's the story here?

    I like riddler's posts. You have an unhealthy obsession with him counting his posts. There's a very easy mechanism called Ignore His Posts which you can use, but it's very clear as others have noticed all you're really about is spoiling for fights.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 4:37 PM GMT
    socalfitness saidI like riddler's posts. You have an unhealthy obsession with him counting his posts. There's a very easy mechanism called Ignore His Posts which you can use, but it's very clear as others have noticed all you're really about is spoiling for fights.


    It's somewhat bizarre. It's not so much the number of posts because I think I probably post now far more that is not politically related - but I have to imagine his primary objection is how contrary to his world view they are.

    Either that or he can't count.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 5:26 PM GMT
    ART_DECO said
    riddler78 said
    Oh you do realize it's a bit early in the day to start drinking so heavily?

    I wondered when you'd try an ad hominem attack on me. When you can't dispute the facts, go for the messenger.

    And you still haven't explained your many hundreds of Obamacare attacks from Canada. Several hundred in one thread alone that I linked above, which is like a monologue by you. Am I drunk about those, too?


    This aging clown loves to accuse his opponents of what she herself did just a few posts above. The other trick is to change the subject and circle the wagons around any champion of the left, in this case Joe Biden. It would be pathetic if it didn't look so convincing to low information people, instead making it dangerous. He won't see this though, he ignores me. Oh well.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 6:55 PM GMT
    Joe Biden falsely claims he pushed to get Poland in NATO as Sen. committee chair

    http://www.examiner.com/article/joe-biden-falsely-claims-he-pushed-to-get-poland-nato-as-sen-committee-chair
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 19, 2014 7:06 PM GMT
    riddler78 said
    socalfitness saidI like riddler's posts. You have an unhealthy obsession with him counting his posts. There's a very easy mechanism called Ignore His Posts which you can use, but it's very clear as others have noticed all you're really about is spoiling for fights.


    It's somewhat bizarre. It's not so much the number of posts because I think I probably post now far more that is not politically related - but I have to imagine his primary objection is how contrary to his world view they are.

    Either that or he can't count.


    I like your posts and do read them.

    Several other Canadians post frequently and I don't see any complaints from art_deco about that. Nor do I see him ever complain about Metta8 who starts far more threads than you do. Why is that? All politics. Believe me if you posted left, he would have zero complaint.

    And the drinking references comes from art_deco himself from his own admission and his frequent references to the 'out for COCKtails/drinks' with Wilton Manor's A-listers.

    http://www.realjock.com/gayforums/3706949/

    "Motorcycling actually kept my drinking lower than it is now. If I rode to a bar on my bike I had 2 drinks at most, often just 1, and as soon as I arrived. Then waited at least an hour from when I finished my last drink before getting on my bike again. Ride impaired on a motorcycle and you won't last long.""

    I don't see the issue as he wrote this, not you.