House To Vote On Controversial ‘No More National Parks’ Policy

  • metta

    Posts: 39078

    Mar 20, 2014 5:18 PM GMT
    House To Vote On Controversial ‘No More National Parks’ Policy


    http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/03/20/3416916/house-no-more-national-parks/
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14295

    Mar 22, 2014 7:51 PM GMT
    Well the federal government is having a very difficult time maintaining the existing national parks so it would make sense to table any proposals for newly designated national parks.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 22, 2014 11:06 PM GMT
    There's a simple was to circumvent this, should it become law. Just propose that a new national park be named after Ronald Reagan.

    Republicans will fall all over themselves approving it, and rewriting any law that might block it. Easy. icon_biggrin.gif
  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Mar 22, 2014 11:25 PM GMT
    ART_DECO saidThere's a simple was to circumvent this, should it become law. Just propose that a new national park be named after Ronald Reagan.

    Republicans will fall all over themselves approving it, and rewriting any law that might block it. Easy. icon_biggrin.gif


    Trickle Down National Park
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 23, 2014 12:11 AM GMT
    ART_DECO saidThere's a simple was to circumvent this, should it become law. Just propose that a new national park be named after Ronald Reagan.

    Republicans will fall all over themselves approving it, and rewriting any law that might block it. Easy. icon_biggrin.gif


    Yeah, true, we got the airport so now we want the park.