"X-MEN" Director Bryan Singer accused on sexually abusing the 17 year-old boy. What do you think?

  • str8hardbody9

    Posts: 1519

    Apr 19, 2014 5:19 PM GMT
    I enjoyed watching all his action movies. I live in Hollywood and I had been to diff parties but never seen anything like in the news. It's so sad to hear that and it's a bad image to the gay world.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 19, 2014 5:20 PM GMT
    http://www.realjock.com/gayforums/3783423


    HERE
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 19, 2014 6:09 PM GMT
    burn him on the cross maybe?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 19, 2014 6:27 PM GMT
    By the way how is that different from all the daddies that love to sink their teeth into 18 year olds?

    Cash was outraged when I said those guys are pedophiles,there is a chance he likes little boys as well
  • saras

    Posts: 29

    Apr 19, 2014 7:44 PM GMT
    from what i read, this was way back in 1999 when the guy was 17. being 17 doesn't mean he is 7 years old. what is a 17 year old almost grown man sitting in the lap of a 30 something. This here kid knew exactly what was going on (even back then because 17 years old are not babies) or he was pretty drunk and now after all these years, some lawyer guy is trying to make a fast buck raking up this story. Both the complainant and his lawyer should be caned with the rattan bamboo (10 lashes at least). For the lawyer - so that he doesn't try such shit again and for the 17 year old now 30 plus man so that he doesn't even now try to sit on men's laps and for all those boy-mens who are 17 now so that they don't sit on men's laps.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 20, 2014 3:04 PM GMT
    He did it. No doubt about it.
  • CuriousJockAZ

    Posts: 19133

    Apr 20, 2014 3:35 PM GMT
    I think any time someone waits 15 years to go public with this, and the timing just happens to be right when the accused is set to release one of the biggest movies of the summer, that it needs to be taken with a grain of salt until it's looked into more thoroughly. Also, the kid was 17, not 7, and there is a difference. I'm not saying this is the case, but there are plenty of 17, 18, 19 year old teens running around Hollywood at pool parties and in nightclubs with fake IDs who are wannabe actors, singers, whatever who will throw themselves at anyone to try and get themselves a break. Then, when that break never happens, they can get pretty nasty. Again, not saying this is the case here, but it certainly wouldn't be the first time if it was, and it won't be the last. Unfortunately, once something goes public like that, whether it's true or not, the TRUTH doesn't really matter anymore because the damage is done. Bryan Singer will likely have no choice, guilty or not, to just pay this guy off and make him go away. The problem with that, of course, is that it sets a precedent that opens the door to all kinds of accusers making claims that may (or may not) be true.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 20, 2014 3:40 PM GMT
    bonapart01 saidBy the way how is that different from all the daddies that love to sink their teeth into 18 year olds?

    Cash was outraged when I said those guys are pedophiles,there is a chance he likes little boys as well


    More likely he was responding to your incorrect labeling of others as pedophiles.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 20, 2014 4:08 PM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ saidI think any time someone waits 15 years to go public with this, and the timing just happens to be right when the accused is set to release one of the biggest movies of the summer, that it needs to be taken with a grain of salt until it's looked into more thoroughly. Also, the kid was 17, not 7, and there is a difference. I'm not saying this is the case, but there are plenty of 17, 18, 19 year old teens running around Hollywood at pool parties and in nightclubs with fake IDs who are wannabe actors, singers, whatever who will throw themselves at anyone to try and get themselves a break. Then, when that break never happens, they can get pretty nasty. Again, not saying this is the case here, but it certainly wouldn't be the first time if it was, and it won't be the last. Unfortunately, once something goes public like that, whether it's true or not, the TRUTH doesn't really matter anymore because the damage is done. Bryan Singer will likely have no choice, guilty or not, to just pay this guy off and make him go away. The problem with that, of course, is that it sets a precedent that opens the door to all kinds of accusers making claims that may (or may not) be true.


    Rape victims or men who have been raped aren't quick to tell right away. It's embarrassing and traumatic and no rape or abuse victim wants to go through more humiliation by entering a court and having to tell the story of how they were victimized all over again. This is the reason why sex crimes DON'T get reported. The victim is labeled and blamed by the public who assume he or she was "looking for attention". And if he was in a nightclub with a fake ID, the director should have had some self-control and not taken advantage of this teenager. This type of attention opens very few doors because this man is popular and will have people on his side because he is a big name in Hollywood and the victim is just some kid. Victims don't wanna rock the boat for this guy because (and from what I've read here) he has fans who like his movies and will speak for him. It's insane how we blame victims of sex crimes for being victims.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 20, 2014 4:16 PM GMT
    bonapart01 saidBy the way how is that different from all the daddies that love to sink their teeth into 18 year olds?

    Cash was outraged when I said those guys are pedophiles,there is a chance he likes little boys as well


    Are you actually accusing another member of being a pedophile??? Dude....you're the one who looks like a serial killer. You're creepy as fuck.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 20, 2014 7:06 PM GMT
    Oh, please. They were dating.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 20, 2014 7:08 PM GMT
    The 17 yo wants to sleep his way to the top. Lol, like this is news in Hollywood.
  • BAHBAA

    Posts: 122

    Apr 21, 2014 2:33 AM GMT
    CuriousJockAZ saidI think any time someone waits 15 years to go public with this, and the timing just happens to be right when the accused is set to release one of the biggest movies of the summer, that it needs to be taken with a grain of salt until it's looked into more thoroughly. Also, the kid was 17, not 7, and there is a difference. I'm not saying this is the case, but there are plenty of 17, 18, 19 year old teens running around Hollywood at pool parties and in nightclubs with fake IDs who are wannabe actors, singers, whatever who will throw themselves at anyone to try and get themselves a break. Then, when that break never happens, they can get pretty nasty. Again, not saying this is the case here, but it certainly wouldn't be the first time if it was, and it won't be the last. Unfortunately, once something goes public like that, whether it's true or not, the TRUTH doesn't really matter anymore because the damage is done. Bryan Singer will likely have no choice, guilty or not, to just pay this guy off and make him go away. The problem with that, of course, is that it sets a precedent that opens the door to all kinds of accusers making claims that may (or may not) be true.


    Couldn't agree more.
  • Sunny_x9

    Posts: 95

    Apr 21, 2014 3:32 AM GMT
    saras saidfrom what i read, this was way back in 1999 when the guy was 17. being 17 doesn't mean he is 7 years old. what is a 17 year old almost grown man sitting in the lap of a 30 something. This here kid knew exactly what was going on (even back then because 17 years old are not babies) or he was pretty drunk and now after all these years, some lawyer guy is trying to make a fast buck raking up this story. Both the complainant and his lawyer should be caned with the rattan bamboo (10 lashes at least). For the lawyer - so that he doesn't try such shit again and for the 17 year old now 30 plus man so that he doesn't even now try to sit on men's laps and for all those boy-mens who are 17 now so that they don't sit on men's laps.


    yep I feel that's the true picture . its about making fast money
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 23, 2014 2:38 PM GMT
    I'm not shocked that he would have an underage boy (probably several) at his party when all this happened. This didn't happen alone because he never said he was alone with Singer. There are witnesses out there who are afraid to come forward because of the attention the media AND Hollywood puts on cases like these. How long did it take Corey Feldman to talk about his sexual victimization? And when he did, he revealed how these men molested him and gave him drugs and he was only 13 years old. Egan didn't just go to these parties underage. Someone gave him free gifts, made promises and access to Hollywood events to get him to go to him. But at the end, people will only see, "Oh, he's trying to be famous and get a name for himself." Victimization doesn't really net promising roles in Hollywood. And who the hell would want to use being victimized at 17 as a way for fame? Rape and victims of molestation are always looking for something. This is why Feldman said that these men are bulletproof and why it is hard to disarm a Hollywood rapist or pedophile. BUT this will be a stain on Singer's career that will never go away, even though it is likely that he will get away with it.