Caroline Kennedy Backs Hillary Clinton in 2016

• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Apr 25, 2014 12:13 AM GMT

  
  
  Caroline Kennedy, whose endorsement of Barack Obama in 2008 was a major setback for Hillary Rodham Clinton’s campaign, as well as a personal blow, said Thursday that she would “absolutely” support Mrs. Clinton should she decide to run for president again.
  
  Ms. Kennedy, whom President Obama recently named ambassador to Japan, is the latest high-profile Obama supporter from 2008 to endorse a potential run in 2016 by Mrs. Clinton, who has yet to make her intentions clear.
  
  http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/25/us/politics/caroline-kennedy-says-she-would-back-hillary-clinton-in-2016.html?hp

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• roadbikeRob
  
  Posts: 18131
  
  
  Apr 26, 2014 6:09 PM GMT

  So what, who cares That doesn't mean the hapless Hillary ho is going to have an easy time trying to get elected in 2016. Things have a way of changing very quickly and it is only April 2014.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Apr 26, 2014 6:11 PM GMT

  roadbikeRob saidSo what, who cares That doesn't mean the hapless Hillary ho is going to have an easy time trying to get elected in 2016. Things have a way of changing very quickly and it is only April 2014.

  
  
  Actually, LOTS of people care.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• roadbikeRob
  
  Posts: 18131
  
  
  Apr 26, 2014 6:15 PM GMT

  Cash said

  roadbikeRob saidSo what, who cares That doesn't mean the hapless Hillary ho is going to have an easy time trying to get elected in 2016. Things have a way of changing very quickly and it is only April 2014.

  
  
  Actually, LOTS of people care.

  I strongly doubt it. Its only April 2014 and they are already jumping to conclusions. It is no wonder that most Americans deeply despise politics and don't bother voting.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• tj85016
  
  Posts: 4123
  
  
  Apr 26, 2014 6:31 PM GMT

  lol suprise!

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Apr 26, 2014 7:13 PM GMT

  roadbikeRob said

  Cash said

  roadbikeRob saidSo what, who cares That doesn't mean the hapless Hillary ho is going to have an easy time trying to get elected in 2016. Things have a way of changing very quickly and it is only April 2014.

  
  
  Actually, LOTS of people care.

  I strongly doubt it. Its only April 2014 and they are already jumping to conclusions. It is no wonder that most Americans deeply despise politics and don't bother voting.

  
  
  Your strong doubts aren't being questioned.
  
  A simple Google search supports the numbers of Americans who care.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• roadbikeRob
  
  Posts: 18131
  
  
  Apr 26, 2014 7:26 PM GMT

  Cash said

  roadbikeRob said

  Cash said

  roadbikeRob saidSo what, who cares That doesn't mean the hapless Hillary ho is going to have an easy time trying to get elected in 2016. Things have a way of changing very quickly and it is only April 2014.

  
  
  Actually, LOTS of people care.

  I strongly doubt it. Its only April 2014 and they are already jumping to conclusions. It is no wonder that most Americans deeply despise politics and don't bother voting.

  
  
  Your strong doubts aren't being questioned.
  
  A simple Google search supports the numbers of Americans who care.

  Evidently, there are some people out there with a lot of time on their hands since they are so obsessed with the 2016 presidential election already.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Apr 26, 2014 7:28 PM GMT

  Is no one tired of these millionaires running all the time backed by the same interests who pay to get them elected ?
  
  It's such a farce !

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Apr 26, 2014 7:30 PM GMT

  roadbikeRob said

  Cash said

  roadbikeRob said

  Cash said

  roadbikeRob saidSo what, who cares That doesn't mean the hapless Hillary ho is going to have an easy time trying to get elected in 2016. Things have a way of changing very quickly and it is only April 2014.

  
  
  Actually, LOTS of people care.

  I strongly doubt it. Its only April 2014 and they are already jumping to conclusions. It is no wonder that most Americans deeply despise politics and don't bother voting.

  
  
  Your strong doubts aren't being questioned.
  
  A simple Google search supports the numbers of Americans who care.

  Evidently, there are some people out there with a lot of time on their hands since they are so obsessed with the 2016 presidential election already.

  
  
  Where is "obsession" playing into the equation?
  
  At what point is it acceptable to think about the future?
  
  And is your point that nobody really cares or that the people who do are obsessive?

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Apr 26, 2014 8:49 PM GMT

  Caroline Kennedy Backs Hillary Clinton in 2016
  
  
  That makes all the difference...
  
  
  
  
  
  One elitist royal family backing another elitist royal family, how charming.
  
  By the way, anyone notice a lot of news media are calling her Hillary RODHAM Clinton again? They must be trying to rally the feminist vote. As if the feminists would vote for anyone else...

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• roadbikeRob
  
  Posts: 18131
  
  
  Apr 26, 2014 8:59 PM GMT

  Blakes7 saidCaroline Kennedy Backs Hillary Clinton in 2016
  
  
  That makes all the difference...
  
  
  
  
  
  One elitist royal family backing another elitist royal family, how charming.
  
  By the way, anyone notice a lot of news media are calling her Hillary RODHAM Clinton again? They must be trying to rally the feminist vote. As if the feminists would vote for anyone else...

  I don't give a damn what the news media calls her. She is still and always will be the hapless Hillary ho who needs to be fucked more than twice a year by her horrendously horny hubby. Sadly for her, oh Billy boy finds Monica Lewinsky much more attractive than the hapless Hillary ho.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Apr 26, 2014 9:02 PM GMT

  I point it out to illustrate most media will bend over backwards for her, or any democrat for that matter.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Apr 26, 2014 9:26 PM GMT

  Quelle surprise.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Apr 27, 2014 12:19 AM GMT

  I got news for you Hillary-haterz: You're really not going to enjoy the years 2017-2025 much.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• Posted by a hidden member.
  Log in to view his profile
  
  
  Apr 27, 2014 12:58 AM GMT

  Here's why Obama deported Caroline Kennedy to Japan as ambassador until after the 2016 election:
  
  Caroline Kennedy is an arch enemy of Gov. Andrew Cuomo since he divorced a Kennedy relative.
  
  If Clinton's questionable health gets any worse, Obama wants to support Cuomo for President without any Kennedy interference.
  
  Although he's a homophobe (perhaps reformed: Remember "Vote for Cuomo, not the homo" posters when Andrew ran his dad's campaign for Mayor against Ed Koch), he'd be a better President than old Hillary who likely won't survive 2 terms in office with her history of circulatory problems.

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM
• carew28
  
  Posts: 847
  
  
  Apr 27, 2014 10:09 PM GMT

  roadbikeRob said

  Blakes7 saidCaroline Kennedy Backs Hillary Clinton in 2016
  
  
  That makes all the difference...
  
  
  
  
  
  One elitist royal family backing another elitist royal family, how charming.
  
  By the way, anyone notice a lot of news media are calling her Hillary RODHAM Clinton again? They must be trying to rally the feminist vote. As if the feminists would vote for anyone else...

  I don't give a damn what the news media calls her. She is still and always will be the hapless Hillary ho who needs to be fucked more than twice a year by her horrendously horny hubby. Sadly for her, oh Billy boy finds Monica Lewinsky much more attractive than the hapless Hillary ho.

  
  
  Is it true that Monica's stained dress is now on exhibit in the Smithsonian Institution ?

  QUOTE REPORT SPAM