Wow! CSPAN Aired This? Unbelievable!

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2014 5:34 AM GMT
    (Date aired: September 7, 2014)

    http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/wow-cspan-aired-this-unbelievable-date-aired-september-7-2014
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2014 8:51 AM GMT
    Even if it were possible, why would anyone go to the trouble of rigging Building 7 with elaborate demolition charges, when the twin towers presented a far more spectacular target? Building 7 is a minor footnote in the disaster of 9/11.

    The destruction of this building may present engineering and architectural questions, but the explanation that it failed due to deliberate (and necessarily pre-planned) demolition work is far less credible than the official explanation that it failed as a result of intense heat from multiple fires.

    The "truth" movement don't really like the truth.

    http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2014 1:00 PM GMT
    I'm totally not a "truther" but dude....come on. That building was dropped too damn neatly. I'm not saying I know what happened that day but I sure as hell don't believe the bullshit they've fed us.
  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Sep 14, 2014 1:38 PM GMT
    all those buildings dropped by controlled demolition, not airplanes, it's obvious (yeah I went to engineering school) - you can see the placed charges going off laterally along the side of the buildings

    a lot of the original video I watched dozens of times before are no longer available
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2014 4:27 PM GMT
    Scruffypup saidI'm totally not a "truther" but dude....come on. That building was dropped too damn neatly. I'm not saying I know what happened that day but I sure as hell don't believe the bullshit they've fed us.


    There is plenty of information debunking the conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11. You could start with the linky I posted above.
  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Sep 14, 2014 10:08 PM GMT
    LOL even tons of ASCE members (American Society of Civil Engineers) and AIA (Ameican Institute of Architects) agree those building were intentionally demolished (and not by a plane).
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 14, 2014 10:57 PM GMT
    There had been an earlier attempt by Islamic terrorists to bring down or at least heavily damage the North Tower back in 1993. They detonated an explosives laden truck in a underground parking area, doing lots of damage but supposedly it didn't weaken the structure.

    Could there have been explosives already in place on 9/11, to coordinate with the plane attacks? I suppose, although after 1993 security at the WTC was tightened, and you just can't cart in tons of explosives and start rigging them and keeping them concealed, until the planes are confirmed to be approaching. To my knowledge the hijackers maintained radio silence on the planes, and only air traffic controllers detected something was wrong.

    Other studies have shown that the planes alone could have brought the Towers down, due to their engineering design, of external load-bearing walls with a single core in the center. Which was originally intended for buildings of somewhat lesser height, but David Rockefeller, planner of the WTC, insisted on adding more floors after their innovated design was shown to him. Some have questioned whether that compromised the buildings' structural integrity, making them less able to survive such an event.

    When the girders of the top floors buckled due to the intense heat of the burning aviation fuel, the weight of the collapsing floors doomed the rest of the structures as they pancaked down on themselves. The enormous air pressure of that pancaking caused windows to blow outwards in some locations, giving the appearance of explosions detonating.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 15, 2014 1:23 AM GMT
    Scruffypup saidI'm totally not a "truther" but dude....come on. That building was dropped too damn neatly. I'm not saying I know what happened that day but I sure as hell don't believe the bullshit they've fed us.



    yes, building 7 was pulled



    Owner's Admission

    Silverstein's Apparent Admission that Building 7 was Demolished

    http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/pullit.html

    I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 15, 2014 2:04 AM GMT
    read Alex Jones if you want to know what happened.
    http://www.infowars.com/new-building-7-collapse-video-clearly-shows-demolition/
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 15, 2014 2:05 AM GMT
    "Public caught off guard", because the events that day were so fast moving, no one would question them while the country was mourning their loses, in total disbelief and shock, not to mention the Neo-Con wars that followed. Its only been a few years after, after the shock wore off, that people began to look at this event differently, so did I

    From what I have read, I do have first hand knowledge of some of the 'technology' used by conspiracy theorists to describe the entire 'plot', knowledge that I can not share with you, at least I am not supposed to. Because of this knowledge, I can say I am pretty sure 9/11 was indeed a 'false flag' operation as they call it. But with a purpose, entering a new kind of war that doesn't end, known as the Global War On Terror (GWOT). A vast, money making machine, for many. And as cliché as it might sound, the sociopathic Neo-Cons are behind it all, those who stand to benefit the most from a never ending (religious) war. The general public was 'asleep', I don't mean that literally, kept in the dark mostly by the media. As the internet has evolved, some people have 'awakened' and some are still 'asleep'. Keeping the public in fear is and has been the MO. That is all I am going to say on the matter.

    Those of us who have awakened, just let these people play their games, it is best not to interfere, just 'watch' and pay attention to the moves from the sidelines. Once you do awaken, the fear subsides.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 15, 2014 7:27 AM GMT
    scruffLA said
    Scruffypup saidI'm totally not a "truther" but dude....come on. That building was dropped too damn neatly. I'm not saying I know what happened that day but I sure as hell don't believe the bullshit they've fed us.



    yes, building 7 was pulled



    Owner's Admission

    Silverstein's Apparent Admission that Building 7 was Demolished

    http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/pullit.html

    I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse


    The use of the term 'pulled' is also explained in the link I posted above. Some people just want to believe Hollywood-style nonsense rather than logical explanation.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 15, 2014 11:26 PM GMT
    randwander saidread Alex Jones if you want to know what happened.
    http://www.infowars.com/new-building-7-collapse-video-clearly-shows-demolition/


    Alex Jones is a con. There might be some truth in what he says, but the fact that he's the one saying it makes me not want to listen.