If because of genes (LOL) a straight man can really be gay doesn't it make sense that a gay man could be straight according to your science?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 28, 2014 5:14 AM GMT
    We never do think of that one do we? Recruiting here is what it is all about isn't it? And btw, that Science is being totally shot down right now and not accepted in the Scientific world. They discovered too many flaws in the studies and how they were conducted.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 28, 2014 5:24 AM GMT
    well at least science is trying to figure out instead of saying it's the devil RIGHT AWAY LIKE RELIGION EXTREMIST DO.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 28, 2014 3:03 PM GMT
    Straight men don't "become" gay. They repress who they are due to fucked up social pressures. I don't know of many gay men who repress being straight. This should be obvious. icon_rolleyes.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 28, 2014 3:06 PM GMT
    Jerred saidAnd let me add just one more thing WHICH SHOULD HAVE MADE YOU SKEPTICAL OF YOUR OWN "SCIENCE" IN THE FIRST PLACE...

    Nobody in my family was gay... So who the hell passed down the "gay gene" or "straight gene" to me? I mean even a fucking sixth grader would know that. Totally ignorant and pure political bullshit. OH I KNOW... The GREEKS passed down their gene to me throughout all this time and OH MY GOSH anyone else inbetween them and me MUST HAVE BEEN BISEXUAL right? Well what if it is proven that all men have the bisexual gene? Then what will you do for money? LOL


    My brother and sister has brown eyes and I have green eyes. WHY DOES NO ONE ELSE IN MY FAMILY HAVE GREEN EYES BUT ME? OMG....I MUST HAVE CHOSEN TO HAVE GREEN EYES!!!! EVEN A SIXTH GRADER COULD FIGURE THAT OUT! icon_rolleyes.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 29, 2014 11:30 AM GMT
    By your logic,

    Gay gene = gay.

    So your second part of the title "gay man could be straight according to your science?" can't be achieved by a priori definition, therefore gay =/= straight

    EDIT: Who the hell cares about labels anyways
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 29, 2014 11:37 AM GMT
    SirAndy saidBy your logic,

    Gay gene = gay.

    So your second part of the title "gay man could be straight according to your science?" can't be achieved by a priori definition, therefore gay =/= straight

    EDIT: Who the hell cares about labels anyways


    I agree wholeheartedly on the labels thing.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 29, 2014 2:21 PM GMT
    Crazy AND stupid is one hellava combo!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 29, 2014 2:38 PM GMT
    Jerred said... discovered too many flaws in the studies and how they were conducted.
    When you are trying to so a study on something like 3-5% of the population thats in a closet, the numbers are just too small and i bet the subjects are not booming to talk.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 29, 2014 2:50 PM GMT
    pellaz said
    Jerred said... discovered too many flaws in the studies and how they were conducted.
    When you are trying to so a study on something like 3-5% of the population thats in a closet, the numbers are just too small and i bet the subjects are not booming to talk.


    I understand that concept when it comes to trying to get certain statistics on the gay community but in this case the intent cannot work if all they are trying to do is prove genes are responsible for being gay... It would have to be genes are responsible for sexual orientation which includes everyone. Maybe I am wrong but nevertheless the reasons these studies were shot down had nothing to do with how small the population in the gay community is... It was actually a list of things regarding all the numerous studies done. I don't remember what they were but my main point is that people here need to stop teaching others that come on here who are confused with their sexuality that "you are born with it" when in fact that may not be true. Am I trying to change sexual orientations around here? Hell no. But when a person is struggling with something as deep as sexual orientation I think it is much safer to allow them to find their way rather than deem them a label based on thoughts they have had or actions they have made. Interests and actions change.