My Turn: Is Mitch McConnell evil or just plain stupid?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 15, 2014 3:22 AM GMT
    I vote evil, they are a disease icon_twisted.gif


    http://www.examiner.com/article/my-turn-is-mitch-mcconnell-evil-or-just-plain-stupid

    War?

    A second war?

    Really?

    Does Senator McConnell actually believe that we didn’t notice that he and his allies, John Boehner, the Koch brothers, The Tea Party, and the 1% declared war on America’s first black president on January 20, 2009?

    This is Mitch McConnell . . . the prominent Republican Senator who, on election night, 2008, threatened to do everything he could “make Barack Obama a one-term president” and then made good on that threat by doing everything he could to prevent President Obama from putting a stop to the hundreds of thousands of jobs hemorrhaging each month in the immediate aftermath of the 2008 crash.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 15, 2014 7:28 AM GMT
    McTurtle is just plain evil
  • HndsmKansan

    Posts: 16311

    Nov 15, 2014 1:14 PM GMT
    Sharkspeare saidMcTurtle is just plain evil


    I am of the opinion, the next 2 years will simply be a "war between the branches" so to speak. I think Obama is really tired of the bullshit and with good reason.
  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Nov 15, 2014 1:35 PM GMT
    Sharkspeare saidMcTurtle is just plain evil


    yep just like McCain, they have no problem buying body bags for American soldiers and bombing some god forsaken country, but god forbid they spend a nickel for the country's well being
  • NerdLifter

    Posts: 1509

    Nov 15, 2014 2:28 PM GMT
    Mitch McConnell = the Heart of Darkness.

    One of the most corrupt politicians who loves our system of legalized bribery. His #1 priority is more big government subsidies for his donors, tax cuts for his donors, and anything else his corporate donors want.
  • rnch

    Posts: 11524

    Nov 15, 2014 3:09 PM GMT
    HndsmKansan said
    ...... I think Obama is really tired of the bullshit and with good reason.





    Agree.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 15, 2014 4:18 PM GMT
    He is a loathsome political hack of the first degree. His only loyalty is to whoever donates to his campaign(s). And to be honest, his recent opponent Allison Grimes wasn't much better. She's a sell-out. Had she won, I would have been hard pressed to say that the end justified her means. Just tell it the way it is: coal sucks and you voted for the black guy!

    Get money out of politics NOW!
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14310

    Nov 15, 2014 4:24 PM GMT

    This is all the more reason to permanently end the democratic-republican duopoly that has ruined America. It is time for viable alternative political parties. Both democrats and republicans are equally corrupt, bought, and no damned good. It is just more of the same old shit regardless whether it is blue or red.
  • NerdLifter

    Posts: 1509

    Nov 15, 2014 5:11 PM GMT
    Koastal saidHe is a loathsome political hack of the first degree. His only loyalty is to whoever donates to his campaign(s). And to be honest, his recent opponent Allison Grimes wasn't much better. She's a sell-out. Had she won, I would have been hard pressed to say that the end justified her means. Just tell it the way it is: coal sucks and you voted for the black guy!

    Get money out of politics NOW!


    ^^^ +1000, this.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 15, 2014 5:57 PM GMT
    "evil or just plain stupid?"

    Absolutely both! He is a repuke! icon_mad.gif

    This is who and what they all are. Perfect example? The repukes on this site! They are the worst of the lot. These repukes continually support the party that is absolutely against Gays. If the repuke party could, they would line us up in front of trenches, and shoot us in the backs. (Well they already shoot us in the backs all the time as it it.) But I digress....

    I love recently how the repukes on this site post to the forums with links to stories about how the repuke party is "allowing" certain Gay RIGHTS issues to pass. As if we should be grateful. icon_eek.gif F them, and F the repukes here for feeling this way.
    They are not doing it for the right reasons at all. They are doing it to change public perception. Still F-ing hypocrites! Leopards can't change their spots. Just as we as Gay people can't choose being Gay. But according to the repuke/religion morons out there, we can.

    Now once again, this country will go to war, spend trillions of dollars, to clean up the mess that the repukes started when his hign-ASS bush reigned his kingdom.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 15, 2014 6:37 PM GMT
    Maher said it best. Obama views compromise not as an equal giving and taking, but as a "meeting in the middle" or "finding common ground." This amounts to saying that Obama would never do anything that he wouldn't do already. Each and every one of you would remain single and have no close friends if that's how you viewed compromise. He has only himself to blame.

    Obama is one of the worst leaders imaginable in the history of our nation. He doesn't know what leadership is, he has no idea what compromise is, he has no idea how to bring others into dialogue with him, and he thinks (like others on this thread) that everyone with whom he disagrees on fundamental principles is beneath him intellectually and socially.

    I still remember getting off the train for "Bulldog Days" when I had gotten into Yale and was visiting the school. Outside of the Hartford airport several of us were waiting for a bus to take us to Yale. This was in 2008 during the Democratic primaries, and quite early in the process. Naturally, the discussion turned to politics, and everyone was eager to know whom everyone was voting for. With me as the lone exception, everyone else said "Hillary" or "Obama" based upon their sex and race. Every white man said "Obama". Every black man said "Obama." Every non-black girl said "Hillary". In this group there was one Black girl, and she was the only one who struggled before she said "Hillary."

    This episode shows the problem with the Democratic Party in a nutshell, and sadly this becomes everyone's problem when a Democratic president is unleashed onto the country. No one was trying to discern who the more qualified leader was. No one was trying to discern who would best lead the country. No one was analyzing the character and virtue of the candidates. No one was analyzing their beliefs. What mattered were the skin tone and the genitals of the two candidates. This is why we elected such a crappy leader, someone entirely unfit for office. Had Hillary won, we would have actually had a functional government during the past 6 years because, you know, she is a capable leader and has a basic understanding of what leadership and presidential leadership entails. Don't blame Obama's incompetence on Republicans' "hatred" or "racism" or anything else. The blame lies squarely both on Obama for having the hubris to run against a slate of infinitely more qualified candidates and on those citizens who voted for him and thereby failed in their democratic duty to elect candidates who possess leadership qualities. This thread is silly in the extreme.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 15, 2014 6:52 PM GMT
    musclefetish said"evil or just plain stupid?"

    Absolutely both! He is a repuke! icon_mad.gif

    This is who and what they all are. Perfect example? The repukes on this site! They are the worst of the lot. These repukes continually support the party that is absolutely against Gays. If the repuke party could, they would line us up in front of trenches, and shoot us in the backs. (Well they already shoot us in the backs all the time as it it.) But I digress....

    I love recently how the repukes on this site post to the forums with links to stories about how the repuke party is "allowing" certain Gay RIGHTS issues to pass. As if we should be grateful. icon_eek.gif F them, and F the repukes here for feeling this way.
    They are not doing it for the right reasons at all. They are doing it to change public perception. Still F-ing hypocrites! Leopards can't change their spots. Just as we as Gay people can't choose being Gay. But according to the repuke/religion morons out there, we can.

    Now once again, this country will go to war, spend trillions of dollars, to clean up the mess that the repukes started when his hign-ASS bush reigned his kingdom.



    And repukes keep a secret, they create the condition and then fund the war machine!, slime balls icon_twisted.gif
    http://www.realjock.com/gayforums/3953236

    Are the repukes behind creating our own homeland domestic violence as well, you know, the 'crazy' people who do mass shootings? They do a very good job at dividing the country, if we know they create the condition for war, then pay for both sides to fight it, doesn't it stand to reason that the same repukes are causing our own 'war' (by giving everyone guns, keeping wages low, keeping people in fear) in the states? icon_idea.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 15, 2014 7:32 PM GMT
    KJSharp saidMaher said it best. Obama views compromise not as an equal giving and taking, but as a "meeting in the middle" or "finding common ground." This amounts to saying that Obama would never do anything that he wouldn't do already. Each and every one of you would remain single and have no close friends if that's how you viewed compromise. He has only himself to blame.

    Obama is one of the worst leaders imaginable in the history of our nation. He doesn't know what leadership is, he has no idea what compromise is, he has no idea how to bring others into dialogue with him, and he thinks (like others on this thread) that everyone with whom he disagrees on fundamental principles is beneath him intellectually and socially.

    I still remember getting off the train for "Bulldog Days" when I had gotten into Yale and was visiting the school. Outside of the Hartford airport several of us were waiting for a bus to take us to Yale. This was in 2008 during the Democratic primaries, and quite early in the process. Naturally, the discussion turned to politics, and everyone was eager to know whom everyone was voting for. With me as the lone exception, everyone else said "Hillary" or "Obama" based upon their sex and race. Every white man said "Obama". Every black man said "Obama." Every non-black girl said "Hillary". In this group there was one Black girl, and she was the only one who struggled before she said "Hillary."

    This episode shows the problem with the Democratic Party in a nutshell, and sadly this becomes everyone's problem when a Democratic president is unleashed onto the country. No one was trying to discern who the more qualified leader was. No one was trying to discern who would best lead the country. No one was analyzing the character and virtue of the candidates. No one was analyzing their beliefs. What mattered were the skin tone and the genitals of the two candidates. This is why we elected such a crappy leader, someone entirely unfit for office. Had Hillary won, we would have actually had a functional government during the past 6 years because, you know, she is a capable leader and has a basic understanding of what leadership and presidential leadership entails. Don't blame Obama's incompetence on Republicans' "hatred" or "racism" or anything else. The blame lies squarely both on Obama for having the hubris to run against a slate of infinitely more qualified candidates and on those citizens who voted for him and thereby failed in their democratic duty to elect candidates who possess leadership qualities. This thread is silly in the extreme.


    So there you were on your way to Yale and you've told us how and why everyone was voting for either BO or HC. Yet you were the lone enlightened individual. Please, share with us how much better things would have been under a McCain/Palin executive branch (now there's a 'qualified" team). And while your're at it, share with us all the horrific economic and social woes we've had to endure over the last 6 years.

    C'mon dude....spew away!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 15, 2014 9:47 PM GMT
    I didn't say I was the lone enlightened individual. I was, I think, one of the few in the group who was judging candidates upon substantive things. You obviously did not understand my post. I was critiquing the way that Democrats are comfortable judging candidates by their appearances and outward characteristics instead of by their inner characteristics, beliefs, and civic leadership experience.

    I think it would have been perfectly justifiable to support Hillary in 2008 (again, are you incapable of reading?). Supporting Obama was simply unacceptable.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 15, 2014 11:12 PM GMT
    "With me as the lone exception, everyone else said "Hillary" or "Obama" based on their sex and race"

    Ok, you gotta admit there's a bit of confusion there but I get your point and I apologize.

    In retrospect, Clinton was the better candidate. She did however, vote for invading Iraq and for me at the time, that was a deal breaker. Look at all the shitstorm we're dealing with now because of that. Regardless, his hyper pigmentation and her vagina, had nothing to do w my decision making.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 16, 2014 12:49 AM GMT
    Obama and his obamacare architect Jonathon Gruber appreciate and depended upon the "stupidity" of voters who supported them:
    http://youtu.be/G790p0LcgbI
    http://youtu.be/LbMmWhfZyEI
    Jonathan Gruber Admits Obama Was in Room During Planning of Cadillac Lie:
    http://youtu.be/V5oNRDCrc5g
    At a Univision Town Hall in March 2011, President Obama clearly said that he could not suspend deportations through executive order because we are a nation of laws:
    http://youtu.be/TfZ3kaKZoIw
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Here's the liberal democrats hypocritical war against woman:

    Disabled veteran and pregnant democrat congresswoman denied proxy vote by liberal democrat Nancy Pelosi:
    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/democrats-duckworth-debacle-pregnant-congresswoman-denied-proxy-vote/

    In July, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued new guidelines that made clear to employers that it is illegal not to provide reasonable accommodations to pregnant workers.

    Hypocritical democrats support a bill that would make illegal their own activities against women:
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/11/14/democrats-denied-a-proxy-vote-to-a-pregnant-congresswoman-heres-the-issue/
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Hillary Clinton has been praised for, eventually, tweeting a condemnation of Boko Haram’s kidnappings, but she hasn’t had anything to say about the Sultan of Brunei’s plans to stone gay men to death.

    And that’s not too surprising.

    Hillary, like Obama, has been to Brunei and set up relationships with the Islamic tyranny. Bill Clinton and Chelsea visited Brunei last year. The Beverly Hills hotel being boycotted by Hollywood over its ownership by the Sultan of Brunei hired a Clinton aide as a crisis manager.

    The Clinton Foundation, which has played a key role in helping position Hillary for her 2016 race, received between $1 and $5 million from Brunei.

    So it’s not surprising that Hillary, despite flirting with gay rights, has nothing to say about Brunei, even as her Hollywood donors are vowing to boycott businesses linked to the Muslim country.

    It’s not just about Brunei. The Clinton Foundation received even bigger amounts of money from Saudi Arabia. If Hillary Clinton isn’t prepared to criticize the Sultan of Brunei for being prepared to stone gay men to death, will she stand up for human rights in any country that gave Clintonworld enough money?

    Considering the Marc Rich pardon case, it’s known that money buys favors from the Clinton family. The question is how many favors have the international interests that donated millions to the Clintons bought from a woman who aspires to be the President of the United States?
    http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/will-hillary-clinton-condemn-her-million-dollar-donor-who-is-out-to-stone-gays/
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/06/hillary-clinton-photo-style-brunei-china_n_1861487.html
    ------------------------------------------------------------Here are some facts about the Koch Brothers:

    The Koch brothers gave money to charities benefiting gays such as:

    $100 million to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to help fund the construction of a new 350,000-square-foot research and technology facility to serve as an Integrative Cancer Research facility.

    Prostate Cancer Foundation: contributed $41 million to the Foundation.
    $20 million to Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore.
    $30 million to the Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center in New York.
    $25 million to the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
    $15 million to New York-Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Medical Center.
    $5 million to the House Ear Institute, in Los Angeles.
    $25 million to the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York City.
    $100 million, the largest philanthropic donation in the history of New York-Presbyterian Hospital, beginning a $2 billion campaign which will conclude in 2019 to create a new ambulatory care center and renovate the infrastructure of all of the hospital's five sites where many AIDS patients are treated.
    Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts where many gays are employed.
    The American Ballet Theatre ($6 million) where many gays are employed.
    ----------------------------------------------------
    One can only that some limousine liberals step up to the plate and fund some charities.

    Presidential Advisor, frequent White House visitor and homophobe Warren Buffett donates a lot of money to charities as well.

    The HRC (Human Rights Campaign) rates him a ZERO for gay rights. That's right: ZERO.

    GEICO, a Warren Buffett/Berkshire company, once engaged as a commercial spokesman Charlie Daniels, the only singer I can think of to chart a top 10 record in the United States referring to gay people as "fags" and then to have released a followup which heaped even more of his redneck abuse at the same targets.

    Here's homophobic hypocrite Buffett trying to explain himself:
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/102057692#.
    There's quite a resemblance to some of Obama's hypocritical policy positions.
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Let's not forget racist liberal democrat and presidential advisor Al Sharpton who refers to us as "faggots" and "homos". Here's Sharpton in his own words:
    http://youtu.be/4ltjowC37AM
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Here's video of liberal democrat obama praising his "good friend", the Sultan Of Brunei who passed a law to execute gays by stoning:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxX0Ni3L3bc
    http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/brunei-sharia-penal-code-gay-stoning
    Obama must approve of stoning gays to death because the video of him praising the sultan is still on the White House website and Obama met with his good friend the Sultan this past week in China. Obama is also negotiating a free trade agreement with his "good friend" the sultan:
    ttp://www.forbes.com/sites/johnbrinkley/2014/09/15/u-s-in-trade-talks-with-country-that-practices-sharia-law/
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 16, 2014 2:49 AM GMT
    ^^^^^^ What a busy little Googler this guy is ^^^^^
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 16, 2014 3:04 AM GMT
    Koastal said"With me as the lone exception, everyone else said "Hillary" or "Obama" based on their sex and race"

    Ok, you gotta admit there's a bit of confusion there but I get your point and I apologize.

    In retrospect, Clinton was the better candidate. She did however, vote for invading Iraq and for me at the time, that was a deal breaker. Look at all the shitstorm we're dealing with now because of that. Regardless, his hyper pigmentation and her vagina, had nothing to do w my decision making.


    Thank you, appreciate it. Sorry I wasn't as clear as I could have been.
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14310

    Nov 16, 2014 5:53 AM GMT
    mx5guynj saidObama and his obamacare architect Jonathon Gruber appreciate and depended upon the "stupidity" of voters who supported them:
    http://youtu.be/G790p0LcgbI
    http://youtu.be/LbMmWhfZyEI
    Jonathan Gruber Admits Obama Was in Room During Planning of Cadillac Lie:
    http://youtu.be/V5oNRDCrc5g
    At a Univision Town Hall in March 2011, President Obama clearly said that he could not suspend deportations through executive order because we are a nation of laws:
    http://youtu.be/TfZ3kaKZoIw
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Here's the liberal democrats hypocritical war against woman:

    Disabled veteran and pregnant democrat congresswoman denied proxy vote by liberal democrat Nancy Pelosi:
    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/democrats-duckworth-debacle-pregnant-congresswoman-denied-proxy-vote/

    In July, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued new guidelines that made clear to employers that it is illegal not to provide reasonable accommodations to pregnant workers.

    Hypocritical democrats support a bill that would make illegal their own activities against women:
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/11/14/democrats-denied-a-proxy-vote-to-a-pregnant-congresswoman-heres-the-issue/
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Hillary Clinton has been praised for, eventually, tweeting a condemnation of Boko Haram’s kidnappings, but she hasn’t had anything to say about the Sultan of Brunei’s plans to stone gay men to death.

    And that’s not too surprising.

    Hillary, like Obama, has been to Brunei and set up relationships with the Islamic tyranny. Bill Clinton and Chelsea visited Brunei last year. The Beverly Hills hotel being boycotted by Hollywood over its ownership by the Sultan of Brunei hired a Clinton aide as a crisis manager.

    The Clinton Foundation, which has played a key role in helping position Hillary for her 2016 race, received between $1 and $5 million from Brunei.

    So it’s not surprising that Hillary, despite flirting with gay rights, has nothing to say about Brunei, even as her Hollywood donors are vowing to boycott businesses linked to the Muslim country.

    It’s not just about Brunei. The Clinton Foundation received even bigger amounts of money from Saudi Arabia. If Hillary Clinton isn’t prepared to criticize the Sultan of Brunei for being prepared to stone gay men to death, will she stand up for human rights in any country that gave Clintonworld enough money?

    Considering the Marc Rich pardon case, it’s known that money buys favors from the Clinton family. The question is how many favors have the international interests that donated millions to the Clintons bought from a woman who aspires to be the President of the United States?
    http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/will-hillary-clinton-condemn-her-million-dollar-donor-who-is-out-to-stone-gays/
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/06/hillary-clinton-photo-style-brunei-china_n_1861487.html
    ------------------------------------------------------------Here are some facts about the Koch Brothers:

    The Koch brothers gave money to charities benefiting gays such as:

    $100 million to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to help fund the construction of a new 350,000-square-foot research and technology facility to serve as an Integrative Cancer Research facility.

    Prostate Cancer Foundation: contributed $41 million to the Foundation.
    $20 million to Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore.
    $30 million to the Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center in New York.
    $25 million to the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
    $15 million to New York-Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Medical Center.
    $5 million to the House Ear Institute, in Los Angeles.
    $25 million to the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York City.
    $100 million, the largest philanthropic donation in the history of New York-Presbyterian Hospital, beginning a $2 billion campaign which will conclude in 2019 to create a new ambulatory care center and renovate the infrastructure of all of the hospital's five sites where many AIDS patients are treated.
    Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts where many gays are employed.
    The American Ballet Theatre ($6 million) where many gays are employed.
    ----------------------------------------------------
    One can only that some limousine liberals step up to the plate and fund some charities.

    Presidential Advisor, frequent White House visitor and homophobe Warren Buffett donates a lot of money to charities as well.

    The HRC (Human Rights Campaign) rates him a ZERO for gay rights. That's right: ZERO.

    GEICO, a Warren Buffett/Berkshire company, once engaged as a commercial spokesman Charlie Daniels, the only singer I can think of to chart a top 10 record in the United States referring to gay people as "fags" and then to have released a followup which heaped even more of his redneck abuse at the same targets.

    Here's homophobic hypocrite Buffett trying to explain himself:
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/102057692#.
    There's quite a resemblance to some of Obama's hypocritical policy positions.
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Let's not forget racist liberal democrat and presidential advisor Al Sharpton who refers to us as "faggots" and "homos". Here's Sharpton in his own words:
    http://youtu.be/4ltjowC37AM
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Here's video of liberal democrat obama praising his "good friend", the Sultan Of Brunei who passed a law to execute gays by stoning:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxX0Ni3L3bc
    http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/brunei-sharia-penal-code-gay-stoning
    Obama must approve of stoning gays to death because the video of him praising the sultan is still on the White House website and Obama met with his good friend the Sultan this past week in China. Obama is also negotiating a free trade agreement with his "good friend" the sultan:
    ttp://www.forbes.com/sites/johnbrinkley/2014/09/15/u-s-in-trade-talks-with-country-that-practices-sharia-law/
    There it is the hypocrisy of the corrupt, incompetent democratic party. They are no more trustworthy than the republicans but yet all the EXTREMIST LIBERAL HENS on here will try to cover up these true facts with their leftist propaganda and baseless bullshit.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 16, 2014 2:52 PM GMT
    He's a cocaine smuggler.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 16, 2014 6:14 PM GMT
    He was committed to obstruction from the very beginning. He is both evil and stupid. Just my opinion.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 16, 2014 6:45 PM GMT
    ISIS builds schools and hospitals.
    Hitler made the trains run on time.

    THEREFORE: ISIS/HITLER = KOCH BROS
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14310

    Nov 16, 2014 9:07 PM GMT
    Koastal saidISIS builds schools and hospitals.
    Hitler made the trains run on time.

    THEREFORE: ISIS/HITLER = KOCH BROS
    Comparing the Koch Brothers to Adolph Hitler and ISIS is the most stupid, irresponsible thing that I ever heard. But again you are a native Texan which means that you are not too swift in the first place just like all other Texans.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 16, 2014 11:45 PM GMT
    Have you considered therapy for this Texas issue that you carry? I mean I've really never seen anything quite like it. I'm certain that your federally paid for VA plan will cover it as some sort of PTSD thing.

    You somehow think I'm a native Texan - wrong. I'm fully aware that its a state controlled by the right wing, as are quite a few other states unfortunately. Oh and what is this concern you have with my penis? Should you elect to pursue therapy, you may want to bring that up as well w your therapist. Perhaps you are somehow obsessed with the size of things? .... States, penises, your manboobs, etc.

    You know dude, you can email me through this site if you want to discuss shit that's off topic for the forums. I'm sure the other RJ'ers are getting a little tired of your crap. Personally, I'm intrigued.
  • wellwell

    Posts: 2265

    Nov 17, 2014 2:30 AM GMT
    Koastal said^^^^^^ What a busy little Googler this guy is ^^^^^




    Take A Lesson !