Guy said uncut was better.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 13, 2015 3:04 PM GMT
    BF told me that he had never felt BB uncut dick before and it was a smoother ride. Can anyone verify that?
  • Destinharbor

    Posts: 4435

    Feb 13, 2015 4:02 PM GMT
    There's no difference in cut and uncut shape when hard so why would it be any different?
  • Svnw688

    Posts: 3350

    Feb 13, 2015 7:24 PM GMT
    Hmm, I don't know. I've only had sex (1) with condom or (2) bareback* w/ my current (cut) boyfriend, so I have no baseline of comparison.

    (1). The difference between condom and bare is not really noticeable. Mentally it feels different, but physically it's a non-issue (for a bottom, like myself. Tops seems to physically prefer bareback and tops say bare feels better, which makes common sense).

    (2). I'd speculate that the skin of an uncut dick is "looser" whereas a cut dick's skin when hard is more "taut." As such, if skin is looser, and the anus is causing friction (i.e., the man's hole is tight), then the same "thrust" factor on a loose/uncut dick would cause LESS friction than a taut/cut dick. If something is tight, it's going to make maximum friction against the surface. If your b/f equates friction with pain or discomfort, then the less friction ride (i.e., the uncut loose skin dick) would feel better (smoother) in that sense.



    *I know bareback sex, even with a monogamous partner, is risky. We've done the "window" test period, follow up tests, agree not to cheat, agree if we did cheat we'd use a condom, and are open and communicative. It's a calculated risk I've taken, and I neither advocate for or against it. But that's why I have experienced BB sex.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 13, 2015 11:25 PM GMT
    Destinharbor saidThere's no difference in cut and uncut shape when hard so why would it be any different?


    Oh yes there is!

    It's like an outer sleeve. It works as sort of a shoe horn.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 14, 2015 4:55 AM GMT
    Svnw688 saidHmm, I don't know. I've only had sex (1) with condom or (2) bareback* w/ my current (cut) boyfriend, so I have no baseline of comparison.

    (1). The difference between condom and bare is not really noticeable. Mentally it feels different, but physically it's a non-issue (for a bottom, like myself. Tops seems to physically prefer bareback and tops say bare feels better, which makes common sense).

    (2). I'd speculate that the skin of an uncut dick is "looser" whereas a cut dick's skin when hard is more "taut." As such, if skin is looser, and the anus is causing friction (i.e., the man's hole is tight), then the same "thrust" factor on a loose/uncut dick would cause LESS friction than a taut/cut dick. If something is tight, it's going to make maximum friction against the surface. If your b/f equates friction with pain or discomfort, then the less friction ride (i.e., the uncut loose skin dick) would feel better (smoother) in that sense.



    *I know bareback sex, even with a monogamous partner, is risky. We've done the "window" test period, follow up tests, agree not to cheat, agree if we did cheat we'd use a condom, and are open and communicative. It's a calculated risk I've taken, and I neither advocate for or against it. But that's why I have experienced BB sex.


    It's interesting that you feel the need to so thoroughly defend your decision. It's your life mate.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 14, 2015 4:22 PM GMT
    strongbull said
    Svnw688 saidHmm, I don't know. I've only had sex (1) with condom or (2) bareback* w/ my current (cut) boyfriend, so I have no baseline of comparison.

    (1). The difference between condom and bare is not really noticeable. Mentally it feels different, but physically it's a non-issue (for a bottom, like myself. Tops seems to physically prefer bareback and tops say bare feels better, which makes common sense).

    (2). I'd speculate that the skin of an uncut dick is "looser" whereas a cut dick's skin when hard is more "taut." As such, if skin is looser, and the anus is causing friction (i.e., the man's hole is tight), then the same "thrust" factor on a loose/uncut dick would cause LESS friction than a taut/cut dick. If something is tight, it's going to make maximum friction against the surface. If your b/f equates friction with pain or discomfort, then the less friction ride (i.e., the uncut loose skin dick) would feel better (smoother) in that sense.



    *I know bareback sex, even with a monogamous partner, is risky. We've done the "window" test period, follow up tests, agree not to cheat, agree if we did cheat we'd use a condom, and are open and communicative. It's a calculated risk I've taken, and I neither advocate for or against it. But that's why I have experienced BB sex.


    It's interesting that you feel the need to so thoroughly defend your decision. It's your life mate.



    I've gone through the exact same thing. Gay proganda is pro sex with HIV guys so it follows that monogamous unprotected sex is suspect.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 14, 2015 4:30 PM GMT
    [quote][cite]Svnw688 said[/cite]Hmm, I don't know. I've only had sex (1) with condom or (2) bareback* w/ my current (cut) boyfriend, so I have no baseline of comparison.

    (1). The difference between condom and bare is not really noticeable. Mentally it feels different, but physically it's a non-issue (for a bottom, like myself. Tops seems to physically prefer bareback and tops say bare feels better, which makes common sense).

    (2). I'd speculate that the skin of an uncut dick is "looser" whereas a cut dick's skin when hard is more "taut." As such, if skin is looser, and the anus is causing friction (i.e., the man's hole is tight), then the same "thrust" factor on a loose/uncut dick would cause LESS friction than a taut/cut dick. If something is tight, it's going to make maximum friction against the surface. If your b/f equates friction with pain or discomfort, then the less friction ride (i.e., the uncut loose skin dick) would feel better (smoother) in that sense.


    Interesting . He is really tight. Sometimes he can't take me at all and blows me to get me semi hard so can bottom. It does not feel any different to me. You are probably right since I've always wondered why one would need lube to jack off. It's totally unnecessary since the foreskin slides all by itself. I was married for 21 years it's not an issue with pussy.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 14, 2015 5:43 PM GMT
    I wouldn't know per experience as i am not into anal receiving or giving , but i totally concur with Timm55 , it totally make sense icon_smile.gif

    It is the same principal of when we are masturbating , we do not need lube , as we have that extra skin sleeve icon_smile.gif