Breaking: Hilary Clinton used ONLY her private email as Sec'y of State

  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Mar 03, 2015 2:58 AM GMT
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/us/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-at-state-department-raises-flags.html?_r=0

    lol, yeah I trust this bitch
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14350

    Mar 03, 2015 3:16 AM GMT
    This is just the beginning of finding out the actual truth about this power hungry whore.
  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Mar 03, 2015 3:20 AM GMT
    roadbikeRob saidThis is just the beginning of finding out the actual truth about this power hungry whore.


    nah, I figured she was a corrupt whore way back in her cattle futures trading days
  • Hypertrophile

    Posts: 1021

    Mar 03, 2015 3:39 AM GMT
    There may or may not have been nefarious goings on in her emails, but it sounds more like stupidity to me, though I don't think she's stupid. Greedy, self serving, and power hungry, yes. If she was trying to hide something, using her personal email would be a stupid place to do it. It's too obvious, especially if that is the only account she used.

    Definitely worth looking in to, but it doesn't change my already low opinion of her. I'm surprised however that this is only coming out now. Wouldn't the several thousand federal workers, congressmen, journalists, the president, etc., who have exchanged email with her notice the address is not the official .gov?
  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Mar 03, 2015 3:43 AM GMT
    ^^

    she broke the law dude (again), government emails are not private property, they are Federal property
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 03, 2015 4:15 AM GMT
    She had to make a HARD CHOICE there!
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14350

    Mar 03, 2015 5:39 PM GMT
    2bnaked saidShe had to make a HARD CHOICE there!
    what hard choice? She could have been honest about this from the very beginning rather than being hypocritical and sneaky. But again she is a corrupt, incompetent whore who can never be trusted. That is why it is so crucial for both democrats and republicans to start searching for good, competitive, and competent candidates for the White House in 2016. Hillary is totally unfit for elected office and she needs to be banned from the White House for the rest of her life. The U.S. cannot afford four years of her unethical behavior combined with her total incompetence. Democrats definitely need to say no to the hapless Hillary ho in 2016.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 04, 2015 3:52 AM GMT
    roadbikeRob said
    2bnaked saidShe had to make a HARD CHOICE there!
    what hard choice? She could have been honest about this from the very beginning rather than being hypocritical and sneaky. But again she is a corrupt, incompetent whore who can never be trusted. That is why it is so crucial for both democrats and republicans to start searching for good, competitive, and competent candidates for the White House in 2016. Hillary is totally unfit for elected office and she needs to be banned from the White House for the rest of her life. The U.S. cannot afford four years of her unethical behavior combined with her total incompetence. Democrats definitely need to say no to the hapless Hillary ho in 2016.

    She's too ugly and bitchy to be a ho.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 04, 2015 4:35 AM GMT
    southbeach1500 said
    roadbikeRob said
    2bnaked saidShe had to make a HARD CHOICE there!
    what hard choice? She could have been honest about this from the very beginning rather than being hypocritical and sneaky. But again she is a corrupt, incompetent whore who can never be trusted. That is why it is so crucial for both democrats and republicans to start searching for good, competitive, and competent candidates for the White House in 2016. Hillary is totally unfit for elected office and she needs to be banned from the White House for the rest of her life. The U.S. cannot afford four years of her unethical behavior combined with her total incompetence. Democrats definitely need to say no to the hapless Hillary ho in 2016.


    Hard choice? I think he was being sarcastic. At least I HOPE he was!


    Something she knows is WRONG!....but she rationalizes her way out of with a forked tongue like her foolish book. Who cares about this old hag trying to fill BILLS Shoes? LOL

    So yes, I was being very sarcastic based on her own title!!

    hahaa
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 06, 2015 3:43 AM GMT
    Hmm...looks like the whole "It wasn't a law yet!" defense is crumbling apart. Looks like the State Department had established particular e-mail protocol prior to Clinton's assuming the Secretaryship:

    http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/state-department-email-rule-hillary-clinton-115804.html?cmpid=sf
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 06, 2015 9:26 PM GMT
    I respect and admire Hillary Clinton, but I think she may have shown very poor judgment in this matter. This story has the potential to derail her candidacy for the presidential nomination. If her electoral prospects sink, her party will almost certainly go down with her, which would be a real shame.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 07, 2015 12:53 AM GMT
    Ex_Mil8 saidI respect and admire Hillary Clinton, but I think she may have shown very poor judgment in this matter. This story has the potential to derail her candidacy for the presidential nomination. If her electoral prospects sink, her party will almost certainly go down with her, which would be a real shame.


    Time for some fresh air......
    REAL change? When? Now!
  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Mar 07, 2015 1:50 AM GMT
    ^^

    True. The Hilary apologists like to brush this aside not realizing how dangerous having a private email server as Secretary of State really is.

    She put herself above the business of a nation, but most Dems don't care or understand the implications. I don't care if Colin Powell did it, he should have been fired also.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 07, 2015 9:29 AM GMT
    ^
    Clinton has been a good advocate for gay rights. (Doubtless you will claim she has been doing that for her own cynical ends, but there are not many net votes to be gained in advancing the rights of gay people.) I therefore do not think she deserves some of the more extreme and personal vitriol coming from some people here, even if you vehemently disagree with her on other matters. One thing is for sure; whoever the GOP presidential candidate turns out to be, your rights as a gay person will be no more important to him or her than a bit of dog mess on their shoe. Then again, I suspect that's how you'd like it.
  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Mar 07, 2015 3:52 PM GMT
    ^^

    the fundamental problem with your logic it that the US, once again, will be faced with voting for one of 2 horrible candidates

    a corrupt women who puts herself above the country, albeit who believes in LBGT and women's rights to equitable pay, and an intellectual buffoon with a corrupt family legacy (e.g. Bush)

    either way, we lose - and most of us are sick of it
  • Hypertrophile

    Posts: 1021

    Mar 07, 2015 4:00 PM GMT
    Anyone that thinks this issue is not entirely about 2016 doesn't know very much about American politics. The fact that she used her private email account for four years as Secretary of State, a post she held two years ago, but this issue is only coming out now should be your clue.
  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Mar 07, 2015 4:25 PM GMT
    ^^

    well comedians says timing is everything, but it doesn't make what she did any less wrong

    and she knew it was wrong, but she did it anyway

    I thinl she cares more about her worldwide power play and money machinations than the welfare of the nation (hence the secrecy)

    no Hilary vote from me, I'll do a write-in
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 07, 2015 6:50 PM GMT
    tj85016 said^^

    the fundamental problem with your logic it that the US, once again, will be faced with voting for one of 2 horrible candidates

    a corrupt women who puts herself above the country, albeit who believes in LBGT and women's rights to equitable pay, and an intellectual buffoon with a corrupt family legacy (e.g. Bush)

    either way, we lose - and most of us are sick of it


    My only 'logic' is that referring to her as a 'bitch', a 'ho' an 'old hag' and 'ugly' (all terms used above) doesn't add anything useful to the debate and is pretty disrespectful on any level, especially coming from gay people, whose equal rights she has supported.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 07, 2015 11:13 PM GMT
    If she setup her own email server: from a technical pt of view its is good and necessary thing. Forward thinking and real world initive. I hope her IT peeps shredded the hard drives every 6 mo.
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14350

    Mar 08, 2015 2:48 AM GMT
    Ex_Mil8 said
    tj85016 said^^

    the fundamental problem with your logic it that the US, once again, will be faced with voting for one of 2 horrible candidates

    a corrupt women who puts herself above the country, albeit who believes in LBGT and women's rights to equitable pay, and an intellectual buffoon with a corrupt family legacy (e.g. Bush)

    either way, we lose - and most of us are sick of it


    My only 'logic' is that referring to her as a 'bitch', a 'ho' an 'old hag' and 'ugly' (all terms used above) doesn't add anything useful to the debate and is pretty disrespectful on any level, especially coming from gay people, whose equal rights she has supported.
    In terms of supporting gay rights, this whore talked a good game just to get support. When it came time to actually implement her support, the hapless Hillary ho did the exact same thing to gays/lesbians as she did to blacks, Hispanics, she threw everyone under an approaching bus. She is only an ally when it is convenient for her in terms of getting support. Otherwise, she is a phony who is only out for her own self aggrandizement.
  • bobbobbob

    Posts: 2812

    Mar 08, 2015 5:27 AM GMT
    Hey guys... Serious question here.

    I watch a lot of news and listen to NPR as well. I don't recall hearing one single Hillary sighting all week.

    Have any of you?

    Don't tell me she's ducking out of sight because she's never done that in her life.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 08, 2015 5:28 AM GMT
    MY MANS COCK IS BIGGER THAN YOURS!
    Oh, I am voting for HILARY!! Your bro sucks.


    12_5.jpg?alias=standard_900x600
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 08, 2015 11:35 AM GMT
    roadbikeRob saidIn terms of supporting gay rights, this whore talked a good game just to get support. When it came time to actually implement her support, the hapless Hillary ho did the exact same thing to gays/lesbians as she did to blacks, Hispanics, she threw everyone under an approaching bus. She is only an ally when it is convenient for her in terms of getting support. Otherwise, she is a phony who is only out for her own self aggrandizement.


    You have had an almost pathological downer on HC on this site for as long as I can remember. Calling her a 'whore' doesn't suggest an objective analysis. Perhaps as a baby you were dropped on your head by a HC lookalike.