Had the world been sitting on its hands, doing nothing (as was done about NK), it would have already been for real. Luckily the Iranian nuclear program (which has been playing cat-and-mouse games with international inspectors as Iraq had) has suffered regular set-backs, including the stuxnet virus (that destroyed 20% of Iran's centrifuges), mysterious explosions at facilities, and the loss of key personnel.
AyaTrollah/Propaganda pouncer> blah blah blah Israel 1961 blah blah blah
He is stuck in 1961 or, as usual, on Israel?
It's not 1961 and we're not discussing Israel.
AyaTrollah> Netanyahu isn't speaking for Israel?
From weak minds come weak associations.
AyaTrollah> exposing your lack of principle
To the contrary. How odd that he speaks and condemns Israel for something more than half a century ago yet applauds Iran today.
AyaTrollah> Can you quote me?
ROTFL. Nearly 5,000 posts over 7 years and not once has he said a single negative thing about Iran. Skirting their execution of gays, their support of terrorist groups like Hizbullah and Hamas, claiming they (not the US or Britain) have freedom of speech, and denying there were massive protests and crack-downs.What's not just odd but shows mental perversion is someone who thinks that blowing up civilian buses, restaurants, markets, discos, hotels and the rocketing of urban population centers is NOT terrorism (but legitimate "resistance" and "self-defense") then turns around and claims that a virus that targets nuclear centrifuges is "terrorism", as are explosions that happen at illegal (undeclared) nuclear sites.
AyaTrollah> I have condemned attacks against civilians
Liar. He has sought to rationalize and justify the above, even claiming that they have a "right" to do this because "occupation". As he goes on to say: "(largely symbolic) violence of a brutalized community under decades of occupation" (Arab terrorism of course predates 1967, and was just as illegal before as it is after).
As if to further expose himself, he states this falsehood outright: "violence in the cause of national liberation, by peoples forcibly denied the right to self-determination, is not illegal under international law".
AyaTrollah> If it's false, have a go at challenging it
The burden of proof remains on him to show that such groups may violate the UN Charter and don't have to abide by the Geneva and other Conventions, and are immune from an international treaty against terrorist bombings (with 168 ratifications) which he, idiot as always, references as "UM document".As if to prove he suffers mental issues, he then adds: "violence for the purpose of defeating such a ["national liberation"] struggle unequivocally is [illegal]." Which is to say that in his sick mind, Palestinian Arabs can legally attack Jews and the IDF can't legally defend them. Just how perverted can one be?
AyaTrollah> If it's false, have a go at challenging it
Again, the burden of proof remains on him to show that somehow this suspends a country's right to self-defense. In this perverts sick-with-hate mind, it's perfectly OK for terrorists in Gaza to launch rockets at Israeli civilians (it's only "symbolic violence" and only a few innocent Israeli civilians will be murdered because Israel has invested in defensive systems including early warning alerts, bomb shelters and anti-missile missiles), but it's not OK for the IDF to shoot back and take out those rocket launchers.
AyaTrollah> Those administering the occupation and denial of rights are fair game.
In his sick mind, if a Hamas terrorist shoots at Israeli soldiers, he claims they aren't allowed to shoot back! Jews (and their Arab "collaborators") just need to die, quietly. In reality most of the time the terrorists he embraces shoot at Israeli civilians, and he still claims the IDF isn't allowed to act. Then he pretends he's against attacks on civilians.
Occupations, under international law, are legal. An occupation is what happens between war and peace.
Unfortunate that the Arab parties were quick to war and are glacially slow to make peace.
Odd that AyaTrollah pouncer supports every war against Israel, claims he's for peace, yet opposes virtually every peace initiative.
AyaTrollah pouncer supports terrorism/war forever until victory (Tel Aviv and Haifa are just as "occupied" as eastern Jerusalem and moreso than Hebron in the eyes of his terrorist heroes) because peace will reward rather than punish Jews.
Kurds in Iran or Turkey don't get his support and he calls them terrorists. What a hypocrite.So it's not "terrorism" as you claimed but now it's a "declaration of war"?
AyaTrollah> I called it "cyber-terrorism".
So that's different from actual terrorism.
AyaTrollah> The "explosions" and assassinations to which you refer are international terrorism, plain and simple.
Only to clueless people such as yourself.http://www.un.org/law/cod/terroris.htm
There, now at least it's a UN rather than UM "document".There is a healthy debate in the US (as in Israel) about how best to stop Iran.
AyaTrollah> A debate where the UN Charter (which explicitly prohibits threats of force)
Strange that he doesn't have that reaction when Iran threatens to "burn" Israel, or when the Arab states threatened Israel with force (including moving troops into DMZs). Once again the hypocrisy is all his.
AyaTrollah> So 1967 is relevant all of a sudden but not 1961?
I provided 2 instances of his hypocrisy, the other which is current and about which he remains silent.What people here need to realize is that AyaTrolla pouncer is rooting for Iran.
AyaTrollah> blah blah blah One could just as logically say I "root" for Cuba blah blah blah
Illogical. We're not discussing Cuba. As noted above, in nearly 5,000 posts AyaTrollah pouncer has always served as an apologist for the regime in Tehran.I'm likewise sure that most of us, except him, are happy that Iran has suffered these setbacks and has thus not yet achieved its nuclear ambitions.
AyaTrollah> blah blah blah torture blah blah blah
Look at him grieve that his masters haven't yet gotten their nukes!