No surprise, but the full fledged AyaTrolLiar Anti-Semitic racism comes out:
AyaTrolLiar pouncer barfedThe distinction is arbitrary (wealthy sectors in all groups exert more cultural influence than the less wealthy).
So why single out "Wealthy Jews" rather than "Wealthy Americans"?
AyaTrolLiar pouncer vomitedOver the past 30 years or so, Hollywood has released over 3 times as many films on the Holocaust as on US slavery and the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.
Not sure how many movies one can make on the atomic bombing. How many such movies has the Japanese movie industry - presumably not overly influenced or controlled by them Jews - produced?
As for the comparison to slavery, it is idiotic. The Holocaust took place 70 years ago. For the first 30-40 years after it there was little public discussion about it. So the "past 30 years" were the prime window period. Unlike slavery, which ended 150 years ago. (Don't get it? Compare how many Westerns were made in the past 30 years vs 30-60 years ago.)
AyaTrolLiar pouncer excretedJews are overrepresented, by a significant factor, in corporate and financial centres of power (practically all the key players in the insider-trading scandal of the 1980s were Jews). In the 1990s, 6 of the 7 "robber baron" oligarchs who controlled half of the Russian economy were Jewish. Of the 50 richest people in the world today, 20% are Jewish (Jews are less than 0.2% of the world population).
But none of those 6 "robber barons" are religious.
How is it then that they are "Jewish"?
You mean by ethnicity rather than religion?
Otherwise how is it that you can associate them with one another?
No one denies that Jews (perhaps especially the non-religious ones) are successful.
Just look at the list of Nobel Laureates.
The "statistic" that 6 of 9 (not 7) successful Russian businessmen in the Yeltsin era were Jewish tells us... nothing.
No more so than that all 9 were men.
Or that all 9 were Russian.
Only a mentally sick with hate person would even conjure this as if he had proven something (other than exposing himself as the racist he is).
AyaTrolLiar pouncer pukedIt never raises any eyebrows in "politically correct" circles to say WASPS, or men, wield disproportionate power in the culture, media and politics. Why then should it be considered "anti-Semitic" to flag Jewish influence in these spheres?
Again revealing his mental sickness.
It is "correct" to say this about men because they have historically disenfranchised and repressed (and oppressed) women.
Likewise "WASPS" [sic] have maintained power by withholding it from others.
There is no analogy to Jews, who themselves were often the victims of those in power, and who managed to succeed despite that.
Look at the depths of the perversion: why is it that 6 (non-religious yet) Jewish "oligarchs" in Russia are signs of "Jewish influence" rather than the "influence" of 6 individuals?
Is Justice Sotomayor representative of "Hispanic influence"? Is Scalia a sign of "Italian influence"? Or are they, along with Kennedy, Roberts, Thomas and Alito - 2/3rds of the Court! - a sign of "heavy influence" of Roman Catholics?