Bad News for Hillary: Not even Jon Stewart Ain't Buying Hillary's E-Mail BS

  • bobbobbob

    Posts: 2812

    Mar 25, 2015 4:19 AM GMT

    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jack-coleman/2015/03/12/jon-stewart-aint-buying-hillarys-characteristic-email-dissembling#sthash.NVRG60Hk.dpuf

    Here she is attempting some comedy lines about her emails, relationship with the press, and "no more secrecy"... she'll never make it on open mike night.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLbDkvHvWxU
  • HndsmKansan

    Posts: 16311

    Mar 25, 2015 4:37 PM GMT
    I'm sure she's terribly worried at this moment.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 25, 2015 4:41 PM GMT
    bobbobbob said
    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jack-coleman/2015/03/12/jon-stewart-aint-buying-hillarys-characteristic-email-dissembling#sthash.NVRG60Hk.dpuf

    Here she is attempting some comedy lines about her emails, relationship with the press, and "no more secrecy"... she'll never make it on open mike night.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLbDkvHvWxU


    Whistling past the graveyard, Hill? Question is, who's buried there???
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 25, 2015 5:19 PM GMT
    Y'all better practice saying "President Hillary" now so that in January 2017 your mouths don't freeze up.
  • bobbobbob

    Posts: 2812

    Mar 25, 2015 5:27 PM GMT
    MGINSD said
    bobbobbob said
    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jack-coleman/2015/03/12/jon-stewart-aint-buying-hillarys-characteristic-email-dissembling#sthash.NVRG60Hk.dpuf

    Here she is attempting some comedy lines about her emails, relationship with the press, and "no more secrecy"... she'll never make it on open mike night.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLbDkvHvWxU


    Whistling past the graveyard, Hill? Question is, who's buried there???


    Thanks MGINSD!!!! Reminded me of an old song...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRjHAHt6rzs
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 25, 2015 5:46 PM GMT
    Sharkspeare saidY'all better practice saying "President Hillary" now so that in January 2017 your mouths don't freeze up.


    I have a hunch you won't get much in the way of debate on that one.
  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Mar 25, 2015 5:49 PM GMT
    freedomisntfree said
    Sharkspeare saidY'all better practice saying "President Hillary" now so that in January 2017 your mouths don't freeze up.


    I have a hunch you won't get much in the way of debate on that one.


    well even the Boston Globe is trying to get people to dump this crook and draft Elizabeth Warren into the fray as an alternative
  • Svnw688

    Posts: 3350

    Mar 25, 2015 6:02 PM GMT
    tj85016 said
    freedomisntfree said
    Sharkspeare saidY'all better practice saying "President Hillary" now so that in January 2017 your mouths don't freeze up.


    I have a hunch you won't get much in the way of debate on that one.


    well even the Boston Globe is trying to get people to dump this crook and draft Elizabeth Warren into the fray as an alternative


    Wrong. The editor of the BG specifically said on multiple outlets that the board is NOT endorsing Warren, and is NOT against Hillary. The BG simply wants a robust debate that moves politics to the left, and helps issues sharpen. Not to mention it'll help groom Hillary for the inevitable debates against her GOP nominee.

    The BG is NOT against Hillary, and least of which would be for a trumped-up email "scandal." Don't cream your shorts just yet, Hillary is still supported by Dems.
  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Mar 25, 2015 6:07 PM GMT
    ^^

    who gives a crap who the boards of the NYT and Boston Globe endorses

    they ran giant cover stories supporting a Warren run

    actions speak louder than words, especially with these slimey partisan newspapers
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 25, 2015 6:28 PM GMT
    More bad Clinton news:

    The Homeland Security Department's current No. 2 official intervened to obtain visas for wealthy foreign investors with ties to politically connected people, including Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe and Hillary Clinton's brother (while she was Secretary Of State), according to an internal audit.

    http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/24/politics/dhs-official-helped-clinton-brother-terry-mcauliffe/
  • TheBaise

    Posts: 363

    Mar 25, 2015 6:34 PM GMT
    The guy above me two place in the cheap ill-fitted waiter's tux /SVN----- always has so much / so very much / to say. He knows a lot! Just ask him!
  • tazzari

    Posts: 2942

    Mar 25, 2015 6:52 PM GMT
    What I find most frustrating is our complete lack of any way to move US politics off the rails it is clearly on.

    I'll vote - it's all I can do. But the choices will be abysmal. Personally, I'd like to see a woman president, but I'm sick to death of Hillary.

    We have sunk so low... A large majority who despair and disapprove - and not a damned thing we can do about it.
  • bobbobbob

    Posts: 2812

    Mar 25, 2015 7:40 PM GMT
    mx5guynj saidMore bad Clinton news:

    The Homeland Security Department's current No. 2 official intervened to obtain visas for wealthy foreign investors with ties to politically connected people, including Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe and Hillary Clinton's brother (while she was Secretary Of State), according to an internal audit.

    http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/24/politics/dhs-official-helped-clinton-brother-terry-mcauliffe/


    This needs to become a new topic. I've just been researching this and have a load of material on it that I'm preparing to post.

    It' beginning to become clear why the Clintons didn't want a Secretary of States' emails being accessible to anyone, isn't it?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 25, 2015 8:16 PM GMT
    Hillary's paws are dirty with now charged deserter Bergdahl and its probably in those emails:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/06/06/hillary-clinton-defends-obama-on-bergdahl-says-it-doesnt-matter-how-he-was-captured/
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 25, 2015 8:41 PM GMT
    When you have three, you have three. When you have two, you have two. When you have one, you have none. What is it?

    This is why Bernie Sanders needs to run.
  • tazzari

    Posts: 2942

    Mar 25, 2015 8:50 PM GMT
    Jasonfest saidWhen you have three, you have three. When you have two, you have two. When you have one, you have none. What is it?

    This is why Bernie Sanders needs to run.


    Sanders is WAY too much what we need to stand a chance.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 26, 2015 12:39 AM GMT
    TheBaise saidThe guy above me two place in the cheap ill-fitted waiter's tux /SVN----- always has so much / so very much / to say. He knows a lot! Just ask him!


    That gets an ignore all his posts and a profile block from me.

    "Cheap ill-fitted waiter's tux"--that's an insult and I'm not having it. I'm not an audience to that.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 26, 2015 12:42 AM GMT
    StephenOABC said
    TheBaise saidThe guy above me two place in the cheap ill-fitted waiter's tux /SVN----- always has so much / so very much / to say. He knows a lot! Just ask him!


    That gets an ignore all his posts and a profile block from me.

    "Cheap ill-fitted waiter's tux"--that's an insult and I'm not having it. I'm not an audience to that.


    I have already blocked his profile for something else. Now, I just have to click the ignore all his posts.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 26, 2015 1:25 AM GMT
    tazzari said
    Jasonfest saidWhen you have three, you have three. When you have two, you have two. When you have one, you have none. What is it?

    This is why Bernie Sanders needs to run.


    Sanders is WAY too much what we need to stand a chance.


    Bernie Sanders was against the Iraq war and for gay rights before the Obama evolution while Hillary was for the war and unevolved on gay rights at the same time. Bernie Sanders is also against the Patriot act and NSA.

    Shouldn't we elect the liberal guy who was always liberal and not the moderate who is now conveniently liberal?
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14395

    Mar 26, 2015 1:33 AM GMT
    Sharkspeare saidY'all better practice saying "President Hillary" now so that in January 2017 your mouths don't freeze up.
    You keep dreaming there Mr. Shark. That woman is totally unfit for the presidency.
  • wellwell

    Posts: 2265

    Mar 26, 2015 3:56 AM GMT
    Let's hope no one else does either!
  • daveindenver

    Posts: 315

    Mar 26, 2015 4:46 AM GMT
    Republicans were the ones who were gung ho about pursuing email accounts, and now it has been revealed that their top presidential candidate had not one, but at least two secret email accounts. Jeb Bush’s outrage over Hillary Clinton’s emails was already hypocritical, because his team cherry picked through and has publicly released, a small fraction of Bush’s emails from his time as governor of Florida.

    The main reason the Clinton emails are going nowhere as a scandal is that every major politician has an email skeleton or two or three in their closet. Thanks to Republicans, the media is digging into the GOP presidential candidates’ emails.
  • tazzari

    Posts: 2942

    Mar 26, 2015 4:51 AM GMT
    Jasonfest said
    tazzari said
    Jasonfest saidWhen you have three, you have three. When you have two, you have two. When you have one, you have none. What is it?

    This is why Bernie Sanders needs to run.


    Sanders is WAY too much what we need to stand a chance.


    Bernie Sanders was against the Iraq war and for gay rights before the Obama evolution while Hillary was for the war and unevolved on gay rights at the same time. Bernie Sanders is also against the Patriot act and NSA.

    Shouldn't we elect the liberal guy who was always liberal and not the moderate who is now conveniently liberal?


    Yes, we should - but in today's America there is no way this could happen.
  • tazzari

    Posts: 2942

    Mar 26, 2015 4:52 AM GMT
    StephenOABC said
    TheBaise saidThe guy above me two place in the cheap ill-fitted waiter's tux /SVN----- always has so much / so very much / to say. He knows a lot! Just ask him!


    That gets an ignore all his posts and a profile block from me.

    "Cheap ill-fitted waiter's tux"--that's an insult and I'm not having it. I'm not an audience to that.


    Good for you! And well put.
  • Buddha

    Posts: 1767

    Mar 26, 2015 5:35 AM GMT
    Let's see if this a site whose articles are worth reading:

    Something something, "liberal media bias", strike one.

    Something something, they're crucifying our poor Ted Cruz. Hang on, the guy who wanted to revoke marriage equality? Don't really need the other strikes.