Racial thought police in action: privileged white man beaten to a pulp after giving the wrong answer to question about baby angel Michael Brown #RaceTogether

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 27, 2015 11:32 PM GMT
    stltoday.comThe assault took place about 8:54 p.m. as the eastbound train was nearing the Forest Park Metrolink platform, police said. The victim told police he was seated on the train when the three men approached him from behind.

    One of the men, who was 20 to 25 years old and wearing a red T-shirt, asked the victim if he could use his cellphone, and the victim said no.

    The man then asked the victim "what he thought about the Mike Brown situation." The victim responded that he hadn't thought much about it, according to the police report.

    The man in the red shirt then punched the victim in the face and struck him multiple times, police said.

    http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/man-attacked-on-metrolink-train-after-passengers-ask-him-about/article_f7b500b8-db86-5258-a686-97367fb5bde5.html


    White Privilege Status: CHECKED!

    FmbHp6X.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 28, 2015 12:31 AM GMT
    "Racial thought police"? You mean, three criminals trying to steal his phone?

    "Privileged white man"? Where does it say the victim was "white" or, more to the point, "privileged"?

    I have to ask. Are you southbeach's 'edgier' kid brother?
  • bobbobbob

    Posts: 2812

    Mar 28, 2015 1:49 AM GMT
    Here's the video.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7k7xtpQrrM

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 28, 2015 8:28 AM GMT
    Ex_Mil8 said"Racial thought police"? You mean, three criminals trying to steal his phone?


    Sure, a crime is never racially motivated when the victim is white. Carry on finding excuses you pathetic apologist. There were mostly black people on that metrolink but the attackers chose the white guy to take a beating and be asked about Michael Brown. Of course that's all a coincidence and it was just a random phone robbery right?

    Ex_Mil8"Privileged white man"? Where does it say the victim was "white" or, more to the point, "privileged"?


    The video is right there. I see a white man being attacked, don't you?
    And according to some people, being white is being privileged.

    Ex_Mil8I have to ask. Are you southbeach's 'edgier' kid brother?


    Oh no, two forum users have generally similar opinions and they tend to be the opposite of yours. Surely they must be related somehow.
    You always provide the most precious insight into the mind and thought process of a leftist. Please carry on, for science.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 28, 2015 10:17 AM GMT
    AaronH20P said
    Oh no, two forum users have generally similar opinions and they tend to be the opposite of yours. Surely they must be related somehow.
    You always provide the most precious insight into the mind and thought process of a leftist. Please carry on, for science.


    It has less to do with your similar opinions and more to do with your similar posting styles. You and SB share the habit of supplanting the headline of the story you are quoting, with your own hyped and spun headline. It makes you look a bit desperate (and disingenuous), that's all.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 28, 2015 10:36 AM GMT
    Ex_Mil8 said
    AaronH20P said
    Oh no, two forum users have generally similar opinions and they tend to be the opposite of yours. Surely they must be related somehow.
    You always provide the most precious insight into the mind and thought process of a leftist. Please carry on, for science.


    It has less to do with your similar opinions and more to do with your similar posting styles. You and SB share the habit of supplanting the headline of the story you are quoting, with your own hyped and spun headline. It makes you look a bit desperate (and disingenuous), that's all.


    I really can't see that many posts where the thread title is the same as the actual headline on the linked article. Maybe you could help me out.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 28, 2015 10:44 AM GMT
    AaronH20P said
    I really can't see that many posts where the thread title is the same as the actual headline on the linked article. Maybe you could help me out.


    There is 'same', there is 'similar' and then there is 'off on a tangent'. Yours always seem to fall into the last category.
  • bobbobbob

    Posts: 2812

    Mar 28, 2015 1:28 PM GMT
    AaronH20P said
    Ex_Mil8 said"Racial thought police"? You mean, three criminals trying to steal his phone?


    Sure, a crime is never racially motivated when the victim is white. Carry on finding excuses you pathetic apologist. There were mostly black people on that metrolink but the attackers chose the white guy to take a beating and be asked about Michael Brown. Of course that's all a coincidence and it was just a random phone robbery right?

    Ex_Mil8"Privileged white man"? Where does it say the victim was "white" or, more to the point, "privileged"?


    The video is right there. I see a white man being attacked, don't you?
    And according to some people, being white is being privileged.

    Ex_Mil8I have to ask. Are you southbeach's 'edgier' kid brother?


    Oh no, two forum users have generally similar opinions and they tend to be the opposite of yours. Surely they must be related somehow.
    You always provide the most precious insight into the mind and thought process of a leftist. Please carry on, for science.


    You have to overlook ExMil and his fucktard mentality about making accusations about your identity without any sort of fucking proof for it. That's his fallback strategy when he's got nothing worth a pile of cat turds to say. He'll likely get around to accusing you of being SB's sock puppet or a paid right wing operative here to spread discord with the happy know-it-all socialists and progressives. He did the same to me. Just don't let him get away with it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 28, 2015 2:54 PM GMT
    bobbobbob said
    You have to overlook ExMil and his fucktard mentality about making accusations about your identity without any sort of fucking proof for it. That's his fallback strategy when he's got nothing worth a pile of cat turds to say. He'll likely get around to accusing you of being SB's sock puppet or a paid right wing operative here to spread discord with the happy know-it-all socialists and progressives. He did the same to me. Just don't let him get away with it.


    I did accuse you of being a sock puppet, owing to your bizarre and provocative behaviour. Sock puppetry among the Right here is relatively common and everyone knows it. As your profile is verified, I made a sincere apology, which you replied to with a hail of abuse. I have never accused you or anyone else of being a paid right-wing operative. You just made that one up. You've been on the site for just a few months and you are already a proven liar and deceptive clown, so you might want to clean up your own act before taking pot shots at mine.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 28, 2015 4:35 PM GMT
    Given the obviously racial motivation, as evidenced by the question re: MB, let's hope this is prosecuted as a race-based hate crime.

    But then, we're still waiting for charges of inciting to riot and commit arson to be filed against MB's step-dad.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 28, 2015 5:08 PM GMT
    MGINSD saidGiven the obviously racial motivation, as evidenced by the question re: MB, let's hope this is prosecuted as a race-based hate crime.


    I agree. It is certainly serious criminal behaviour, which must have terrified the victim. If it is proved to have been racially motivated, then that ought to be regarded as an aggravating factor.

    That said, does this apparently isolated crime (i.e. with the MB reference) have any wider significance (as the OP appears to be implying)? Probably not.