Hillary to Announce Presidential Run on Sunday

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 10, 2015 4:10 PM GMT
    11hillary-web-sfSpan-v2.jpg

    NYT: The former secretary of state, senator and first lady is expected to kick off her campaign with a video message, and reveal her reasons for mounting a second presidential bid.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/11/us/politics/hillary-clinton-to-announce-2016-run-for-president-on-sunday.html
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 10, 2015 5:02 PM GMT
    Bitch never heard about the fourth commandment?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 10, 2015 9:40 PM GMT
    DefensiveEnd saidBitch never heard about the fourth commandment?


    It is 'Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.'

    She's not supposed to work on Sunday? (Saturday if you're 7th Day Adventist)

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 10, 2015 9:45 PM GMT
    Besides, only Repubs need to pander to religious freaks.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 11, 2015 3:55 AM GMT
    Here's Hillary staunchly defending DOMA:

    http://www.mrctv.org/videos/dick-durbin-hillary-clinton-and-harry-reid-once-doggedly-defended-traditional-marriage-and-doma
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 11, 2015 10:10 AM GMT
    The difference being, Dems tend to progress on social issues, whereas Repubs are so busy pandering to religious nutters and other conservatives, they usually end up being 25 years behind the curve.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 11, 2015 2:35 PM GMT
    Fearful, Republicans Broadcast "Stop Hillary" Ad Before Sunday.

    http://img.youtube.com/vi/Q4wOIwq49gw/0.jpg
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14372

    Apr 11, 2015 3:56 PM GMT
    This power hungry whore is totally unfit for President. She did nothing when she was a U.S. senator for New York except make a name for herself. Her so called bipartisan accomplishments are a result of her riding the coattails of successful, effective politicians. Otherwise, she just occupied office space in Washington. As for Secretary of State, she sucked big time. She was incompetent and ineffective. Anyone who wants to vote for this brain dead bimbo should be legally required to pay a $5000.00 poll tax or they cannot vote in the 2016 elections. If that cannot be successfully implemented than all the Hillary for President supporters must be locked up in psychiatric wards for all of 2016 and not released back into modern society until January 31, 2017 after a thorough psychiatric evaluation.
  • Hypertrophile

    Posts: 1021

    Apr 11, 2015 4:40 PM GMT
    Martin O'Malley, former governor of Maryland, speaking in Iowa, presumably testing the waters, said about Mrs. Clinton's "inevitability",

    "I know that, as Democrats, we expect -- and I have heard this all over the country -- the Democrats expect a robust conversation about the issues we face as a nation and the challenges we face," he said. "They believe that that conversation needs to take place in something as important as a presidential primary."

    He concluded: "It would be an extreme poverty indeed if there was only one person willing to compete for our party's nomination for President."

    I couldn't agree more.

    http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/11/politics/omalley-clinton-not-inevitable/index.html
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14372

    Apr 11, 2015 6:00 PM GMT
    Physiqueflex saidMartin O'Malley, former governor of Maryland, speaking in Iowa, presumably testing the waters, said about Mrs. Clinton's "inevitability",

    "I know that, as Democrats, we expect -- and I have heard this all over the country -- the Democrats expect a robust conversation about the issues we face as a nation and the challenges we face," he said. "They believe that that conversation needs to take place in something as important as a presidential primary."

    He concluded: "It would be an extreme poverty indeed if there was only one person willing to compete for our party's nomination for President."

    I couldn't agree more.

    http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/11/politics/omalley-clinton-not-inevitable/index.html
    Well I agree 100%. Martin O'Malley is a superior democratic candidate and he is far more qualified for the office of President than the hapless Hillary ho.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 11, 2015 8:25 PM GMT
    roadbikeRob saidThis power hungry whore is totally unfit for President. She did nothing when she was a U.S. senator for New York except make a name for herself. Her so called bipartisan accomplishments are a result of her riding the coattails of successful, effective politicians. Otherwise, she just occupied office space in Washington. As for Secretary of State, she sucked big time. She was incompetent and ineffective. Anyone who wants to vote for this brain dead bimbo should be legally required to pay a $5000.00 poll tax or they cannot vote in the 2016 elections. If that cannot be successfully implemented than all the Hillary for President supporters must be locked up in psychiatric wards for all of 2016 and not released back into modern society until January 31, 2017 after a thorough psychiatric evaluation.


    I am almost ashamed to say I find RBR's anti-Hillary rants pretty entertaining these days. This one actually made me laugh out loud. No one can accuse him of being boring.

    When she wins, however, he could well be one of the first people getting a visit from the Secret Service.
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14372

    Apr 11, 2015 10:31 PM GMT
    Ex_Mil8 said
    roadbikeRob saidThis power hungry whore is totally unfit for President. She did nothing when she was a U.S. senator for New York except make a name for herself. Her so called bipartisan accomplishments are a result of her riding the coattails of successful, effective politicians. Otherwise, she just occupied office space in Washington. As for Secretary of State, she sucked big time. She was incompetent and ineffective. Anyone who wants to vote for this brain dead bimbo should be legally required to pay a $5000.00 poll tax or they cannot vote in the 2016 elections. If that cannot be successfully implemented than all the Hillary for President supporters must be locked up in psychiatric wards for all of 2016 and not released back into modern society until January 31, 2017 after a thorough psychiatric evaluation.


    I am almost ashamed to say I find RBR's anti-Hillary rants pretty entertaining these days. This one actually made me laugh out loud. No one can accuse him of being boring.

    When she wins, however, he could well be one of the first people getting a visit from the Secret Service.
    She is not going to win so stop assuming that the hapless Hillary ho is going to win in 2016. The campaign hasn't even started yet and you are already jumping to conclusions.
  • hebrewman

    Posts: 1367

    Apr 12, 2015 1:48 PM GMT
    icon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gif
  • Hypertrophile

    Posts: 1021

    Apr 12, 2015 2:28 PM GMT
    While there are real reasons to vote for someone other than Hillary, we won't be hearing about those during the campaign. Not unless there are some solid liberals running against her in the primaries able to drive the debate toward the issues. Otherwise all we'll get from the Democrats are platitudes, and nothing but Swiftboating from the Republicans.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 12, 2015 2:53 PM GMT
    southbeach1500 said
    She (or whoever ends up being the Democrat nominee) will be the next President. That's just the way things are at this point in our history.

    The Democrat nominee will offer all sorts of "free stuff" to a large enough segment of the population, while also promising to "punish" (tax) the rich. Right there, you get at least the 48% of the population that is dependent on government "programs" (free food, free housing, free education, free healthcare).

    In addition, the way the demographics and population distribution works out, the Democrats have a huge advantage in the electoral college.

    And thirdly, the press will - as usual - be giving the Democrat nominee a pass on any issues that might possibly hurt the nominee's chances, while doubling down on the Republican nominee.


    Is this a change of tack, SB? If you can't win, because your party has managed to alienate the majority of the population, then bitch about having to pay taxes on your generous income instead?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 13, 2015 12:06 PM GMT
    I don't get the lovefest for Hillary. She has never led anything before. She was only elected Senator of NY because of her name/husband and had no accomplishments while there. Then she ran for Presidency in 2008 and was terribly aloof with few people skills. She was chosen as Sec of State by Obama probably to shut her up, but she didn't do anything in that position except follow Obama's foreign policy. So what has she, herself, done that makes anyone think she's qualified as President? Even if people say they want a woman to be President, just look at all the other women in politics and business that have real accomplishments and have been elected on their own merits, like Warren, or several other Governors and female Senators. Though they may not run this time, it doesn't hurt to wait to elect a woman when it's one who really deserves the chance based on merit, not their husband.bottom line is that Hillary has no real qualifications to be elected President.
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14372

    Apr 14, 2015 1:02 AM GMT
    Asheguy74 saidI don't get the lovefest for Hillary. She has never led anything before. She was only elected Senator of NY because of her name/husband and had no accomplishments while there. Then she ran for Presidency in 2008 and was terribly aloof with few people skills. She was chosen as Sec of State by Obama probably to shut her up, but she didn't do anything in that position except follow Obama's foreign policy. So what has she, herself, done that makes anyone think she's qualified as President? Even if people say they want a woman to be President, just look at all the other women in politics and business that have real accomplishments and have been elected on their own merits, like Warren, or several other Governors and female Senators. Though they may not run this time, it doesn't hurt to wait to elect a woman when it's one who really deserves the chance based on merit, not their husband.bottom line is that Hillary has no real qualifications to be elected President.
    Exactly. +200,000
  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Apr 14, 2015 1:16 AM GMT
    the sole factors determining the outcome of 21016 will be banks, hedge funds and a few telecom companies - and you all know it

    if we don't do something about this, we will experience the same mediocre (and sometimes criminal - aka Iraq) results we've had for the past 30 years