Hypothetical scenario: SCOTUS rules to compel gays to attend religious services and backs homophobophobic speech as a federal hate crime. WHAT WOULD WE DO?

  • bobbobbob

    Posts: 2812

    May 06, 2015 5:42 PM GMT
    Homophobophobic speech = saying bad things about people who are outspoken against gays.

    Comments? Say it like you feel it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 06, 2015 5:48 PM GMT
    I'd just wait it out till the next election and hope a Democrat is elected next time.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 06, 2015 5:50 PM GMT
    bobbobbob saidHomophobophobic speech = saying bad things about people who are outspoken against gays.

    Comments? Say it like you feel it.


    404 rant not found.
  • bobbobbob

    Posts: 2812

    May 06, 2015 7:38 PM GMT
    Hypothetical scenario:

    SCOTUS rules to compel gays to attend religious services and backs homophobophobic speech as a federal hate crime.

    WHAT WOULD WE DO?

    Should we go to court about our own constitutional rights being violated? Which rights?

    Would you feel you were being discriminated against?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 06, 2015 9:30 PM GMT
    bobbobbob saidHomophobophobic speech = saying bad things about people who are outspoken against gays.

    Comments? Say it like you feel it.



    You mean like Russia?
  • Apparition

    Posts: 3521

    May 07, 2015 2:18 AM GMT
    i REALLY doubt bible thumpers want homos attending their churches, I mean, they would have to BE together. Of course the gays would then take over, more snazzy choir gowns, dance routines, better artisian breads, better blood wine, all the painting and stained glass would have to be added, the architectural updates, the expense of upgrading the church kitchens...I mean, the straight people would just feel so inadequate so quickly.