She is only ONE example of this. When you boil it down the religious fundamentalists have NO FACTS- NO DATA- NO EVIDENCE-NO STATISTICS to back up their stand and therefore are compelled to lying in order to maintain a foothold in the debate.
The best most recent examples of this are... ☛
...from the Michigan trial about gay adoption in which the judge not only threw out the testimony of fundamentalist Texas professor and 'sex expert' Mark Regnerus but pretty much read the riot act for to the attorneys for having the nerve to bring him to Michigan to testify.
Read this to see what a dumbass Mark Regnerus turned out to be while testifying. http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2014/03/13/3402971/regnerus-testimony-michigan/
Callie Granade, (love that last name!) a conservative female judge in Mobile Alabama who did the same thing and issued the most concise and brief rulings ever made on gay marriage.http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2015/02/lawyers_ask_for_broad_order_ma.html
The court system is a no win situation for the fundamentalists because they have no facts, data, or evidence to present in a venue that deals with facts, data and evidence. Judges who let their own personal biases dictate rulings against gay marriage either have been or will be overruled by higher courts..... AND THE FUNDAMENTALISTS KNOW THIS. That is why they're murmuring about revolution, violence and war... they know they have nothing with which to win the debate.