metta8 saidI have not read the actual deal. But I want this country to do what we can to minimize the risk of needing to go into another war. IMO, War should only be used as a last resort. There are very powerful people in this country that are pushing for the US to go to war with Iran. And from what I have read about the deal so far, I think that this deal with Iran is a good start. We will get no where treating them like savages, or people that are less than us....
I am pointing out a serious problem or inconsistency with people saying unfettered access to all locations, including military locations, was an absolute requirement. Now these people do not consider it a requirement.
Even if you did read the entire deal, what I said is summarized on several sites. But you are not willing to say negative things about the deal or raise concerns because you did not read it, but you are willing to say positive things about the deal, even though you did not read it.
Inconsistency? Possibly hypocrisy?
By the way, some have said this will lead to a nuclear arms race in the mid-east, leading to increased destabilization and a greater potential for war. This assessment goes squarely against your goal of minimizing the risk of war. Whether you agree or not, the assessments are serious and the whole issue deserves serious reflection instead of one-sided cheer leading
, especially when you say you have not read the deal.