Swedish right-wing party organizes gay parade through Muslim area. Gay-hating leftists say it's a racist move

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 22, 2015 4:29 PM GMT
    LMAO you couldn't make this shit up icon_lol.gif
    Leftists have a cerebral meltdown when they have to pick between their love for gays and their love for Muslims.
    The truth is: leftists don't really love anyone. They love votes and they are so obsessed with votes and government handouts they are incapable of seeing the cognitive dissonance in being tolerant towards gays while promoting mass immigration of muslims at the same time.

    BLAZINGCATFUROn July 29, a gay pride parade is scheduled in Sweden. But, you see, this is no ordinary gay pride parade. This gay pride parade was created by Jan Sjunnesson, former editor-in-chief for the Samtiden newspaper in Sweden, which is owned by the nationalist Sweden Democrats party. The parade is scheduled to go through Tensta and Husby – two areas where Muslim immigrants are more than 75% of the population.

    The Facebook page is absolutely filled with angry comments from leftists, attacking the “xenophobic right-wing nationalists” for organizing a gay pride parade through Muslim areas. Since Islam holds that gays should be executed, something like this is obviously an attack on Muslims and should therefore be outlawed
    . At least, that’s what Swedish leftists – and, indeed, Swedish gays – are saying.

    Leftists are organizing a counter-demonstration against this gay pride parade.

    http://www.blazingcatfur.ca/2015/07/21/sweden-democrats-plan-gay-pride-parade-through-muslim-areas-leftists-and-gay-rights-groups-decry-the-parade-as-racist/
  • jjguy05

    Posts: 459

    Jul 22, 2015 11:54 PM GMT
    AaronH20P said
    The truth is: leftists don't really love anyone. They love votes and they are so obsessed with votes and government handouts...


    That's funny, because the biggest welfare queens are right-wingers, conservatives, and major corporations.

    Like the rest of them, AaronH20P cashes his weekly welfare check, because his fake-profile internet-trolling job doesn't pay enough to make ends meet.

    Blue State, Red Face: Guess Who Benefits More From Your Taxes? (Red States do)

    SlateWith some exceptions, what we regard as red states are sent a whole lot more of your hard-earned tax dollars than the traditional blue states. In effect, supposedly indolent, “tax and spend” liberals actually subsidize the individualistic, pure, and hard-working lifestyle of our conservative countrymen.


    ^^ No doubt, Aaron is one of these right-wing welfare queens.

    Guess who else takes welfare?

    Republican (and gay-hating) politicians:

    Anti-socialist Bachmann got $250K in federal farm subsidies

    Well-known Republican-supporting corporations:

    Walmart benefits from billions in government subsidies: Study

    How taxpayers subsidized Walmart execs' pay

    The NFL:

    NFL gets billions in subsidies from U.S. taxpayers

    Wealthy "libertarian" businessmen:

    "Libertarian" Koch brothers have taken tens of millions in subsidies

    And, for decades, middle class white people got a nice mortgage subsidy that they don't complain about (black people were denied this subsidy):

    NPR"We have a myth today that the ghettos in metropolitan areas around the country are what the Supreme Court calls 'de-facto' — just the accident of the fact that people have not enough income to move into middle class neighborhoods or because real estate agents steered black and white families to different neighborhoods or because there was white flight," Rothstein tells Fresh Air's Terry Gross.

    "It was not the unintended effect of benign policies," he says. "It was an explicit, racially purposeful policy that was pursued at all levels of government, and that's the reason we have these ghettos today and we are reaping the fruits of those policies."

    source: Fresh Air program on NPR

    Oh, and regarding "gay-hating leftists"

    ...ummm, yeah, nice try, Aaron.

    2ba5lvbvhew-fvqivfxv_a.png
    source: Gallup

    But, go ahead Aaron, tell us some more bullshit that you get paid to post.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 23, 2015 3:45 AM GMT
    jjguy05 said

    That's funny, because the biggest welfare queens are right-wingers, conservatives, and major corporations.


    Show me your documented evidence that conservatives are welfare queens... waiting....

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 23, 2015 4:06 AM GMT
    AaronH20P saidLMAO you couldn't make this shit up icon_lol.gif
    Leftists have a cerebral meltdown when they have to pick between their love for gays and their love for Muslims.
    The truth is: leftists don't really love anyone. They love votes and they are so obsessed with votes and government handouts they are incapable of seeing the cognitive dissonance in being tolerant towards gays while promoting mass immigration of muslims at the same time.


    Leftists mostly want power while proclaiming they they have altruistic intent. If any good is actually done it is an accidental side-effect. No one is ever held accountable as the guilty party is long out of office - and passed on.

    Government creates problems and then swoops in to claim victory when a "solution" is found.

    My favorite example is the repeal of Glass-Steagall by Clinton and the sub-prime mortgage debacle. Both were caused by government incompetence.

    Dodd-Frank is supposedly now the fix from the same entity that produced the original sub-prime disaster.

    I suspect Basel III is supposed to handle the Glass-Steagall repeal disaster. But I'm a skeptic.

    I'm sure victory will be proclaimed in either case.






  • bobbobbob

    Posts: 2812

    Jul 23, 2015 12:45 PM GMT
    If you want to talk government subsidies, jjguy05..... let's take them in perspective.

    Remember that unions are THE TOP of all contributors to political campaigns and overwhelmingly support Democrats. The Evil boogey men - those Koch Brothers are only around the 50th biggest contributor.

    Unions thought they deserved subsidies supposedly to cover costs of Obamacare which they overwhelmingly supported. Talk about a double butt fuck on taxpayers... this is it.
    http://dailysignal.com/2013/02/05/unions-insult-taxpayers-with-obamacare-subsidy-request/
    And when they didn't get their subsidies for overwhelmingly supporting ACA they realized their buddy in the White House butt fucked them and they threw temper tantrums.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/labor-union-officials-say-obama-betrayed-them-in-health-care-rollout/2014/01/31/2cda6afc-8789-11e3-833c-33098f9e5267_story.html

    Don't forget that after Unions bankrupted Hostess the government threw the Unions - Not hostess - all sorts of subsidies.
    http://dailysignal.com/2013/02/21/union-that-bankrupted-hostess-to-receive-generous-government-subsidies/

    Government "subsidizes" union dues with 100% tax breaks that add up to over $8 BILLION a year.
    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/ending-tax-break-union-dues-could-save-25-billion_576351.html

    As of this year Unions are getting lower rates on the ACA tax on individuals to cover the costs of high risk/low income individuals.
    http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/03/06/some-unions-get-break-from-health-laws-belly-button-tax/


  • ASHDOD

    Posts: 1057

    Jul 23, 2015 6:14 PM GMT
    Europe is committing suicide icon_cry.gif
  • jjguy05

    Posts: 459

    Jul 23, 2015 6:38 PM GMT
    desertmuscl said
    jjguy05 said

    That's funny, because the biggest welfare queens are right-wingers, conservatives, and major corporations.


    Show me your documented evidence that conservatives are welfare queens... waiting....



    I just did.

    I provided links about Republican politicians like Michelle Bachmann taking a nice fat welfare check...

    about "libertarian" wealthy businessmen, the Kochs cashing a nice fat welfare check...

    about Republican-donor Walmart taking nice fat welfare checks...

    about the fact that Black Americans have historically been denied mortgage subsidies that White people benefited from from the 1940s to the 1970s, and that White Americans today continue to benefit from this because the homes they bought from those taxpayer subsidies have apprecited greatly in home value, even when adjusted for inflation.

    ...about the fact that Republican-leaning states take more from the federal government than they give, while Democratic-leaning states give more than they receive.

    Overlooking my links doesn't mean I didn't provide any, desertmuscl.

    All it means is that you, like all Republicans, are just too damn lazy...even too lazy to read, and expect everything to be spoon-fed to you.


    ALL Republicans...Republican-voters, Republican donors, and Republican-leaning states are lazy welfare queen moochers.

    All of you. You're all a bunch of mooching hypocrites.

    Every single one of you.

    And I have personal stories too.

    I've known working-age Republicans that collect social security, because they can't work because of depression.

    I've known a die-hard Republican that used to steal from the city.

    Let alone Republicans that expect people to work or them to free or shit wages...which is another form of mooching. You guys don't like to count that as mooching. But it is. It's theft, and you're all a bunch of lying, hypocritical thieves.

    All of you.

    And before I let you control the conversation and steer it too off course, as you Republican cheats always love to do, Aaron's main accusation against the left is that the left is [and this is so laughable]...homophobic.

    Why are you skipping over this part of the discussion, desertmuscle? Is it because you know it's bullshit?

    bobbobbob saidIf you want to talk government subsidies, jjguy05..... let's take them in perspective.

    Remember that unions are THE TOP of all contributors to political campaigns and overwhelmingly support Democrats. The Evil boogey men - those Koch Brothers are only around the 50th biggest contributor.

    Unions thought they deserved subsidies supposedly to cover costs of Obamacare which they overwhelmingly supported. Talk about a double butt fuck on taxpayers... this is it.
    http://dailysignal.com/2013/02/05/unions-insult-taxpayers-with-obamacare-subsidy-request/
    And when they didn't get their subsidies for overwhelmingly supporting ACA they realized their buddy in the White House butt fucked them and they threw temper tantrums.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/labor-union-officials-say-obama-betrayed-them-in-health-care-rollout/2014/01/31/2cda6afc-8789-11e3-833c-33098f9e5267_story.html

    Don't forget that after Unions bankrupted Hostess the government threw the Unions - Not hostess - all sorts of subsidies.
    http://dailysignal.com/2013/02/21/union-that-bankrupted-hostess-to-receive-generous-government-subsidies/

    Government "subsidizes" union dues with 100% tax breaks that add up to over $8 BILLION a year.
    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/ending-tax-break-union-dues-could-save-25-billion_576351.html

    As of this year Unions are getting lower rates on the ACA tax on individuals to cover the costs of high risk/low income individuals.
    http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/03/06/some-unions-get-break-from-health-laws-belly-button-tax/




    What a load of crap. icon_rolleyes.gif

    You don't need to go too deep to debunk the Daily Signal.

    Let's just examine this one paragraph from the first article you posted:

    Daily Signal
    Labor union leaders, who are big supporters of President Obama and were big proponents of his health care reform law, want taxpayer dollars to help pay for the increase in their health care costs due to Obamacare.


    There's just so many things wrong with this, you can debunk it just on its fallacious premises without needing to do much research.

    For example, it was never a secret that the ACA would entail subsidies for people too poor to afford health insurance premiums.

    And Democratic voters, unlike Republicans, don't rail against subsidies only to take them in secret. Democrats aren't hypocrites. Kind of a huge point you're missing here, Bob.

    And indeed we now have 17 million fewer uninsured Americans thanks to the ACA.

    Of course, let's ignore that, and let's toe the usual Republican line that "healthcare is now more expensive".

    And instead of blaming the health insurance industry for -devil's advocate- raising insurance premiums lining the pockets of shareholders, let's blame the ACA which counteracts those hypothetical premium rises by offering subsidies to those who need them.

    See the ridiculous logic that Republicans employ?

    Let alone that rate increases are only occurring because the states -which have a high degree of control over this matter- are allowing them to (has nothing to do with the ACA), or that some people are seeing rate increases because they're not taking full advantage of the ACA to find a more affordable plan. Or that health insurance companies had already been raising their premiums for years long before the ACA, and that they're deceptively just blaming the ACA for it. Or that the ACA is based in large part to proposals made by the conservative Heritage Foundation roughly 20 years ago when Democrats were calling for single-payer.

    See how easy that was Bob?

  • jjguy05

    Posts: 459

    Jul 23, 2015 6:45 PM GMT
    As for unions and campaign spending:

    Again, this can easily be debunked without much research.

    Notice the tricky and deceptive way in which your information is organized: The Kochs are -something like- the 50th largest campaign spenders.

    Oh my!

    Yes, but corporate, Republican-leaning folks like the Kochs -when combined- far outspend labor unions.

    Why don't you mention that, Bob? Too inconvenient to the Republican narrative?

    Thanks to the Citizens United decision, corporations and wealthy businesses can now spend unlimited amounts to buy elections.

    So, rest easy, Bob. You don't need to worry about unions outspending corporations.

    Even before the Citizens United ruling, union campaign spending made up a minority of total campaign spending, roughly a third:

    Super-PACs swamp unions in campaign spending

    Washington ExaminerLabor union spending on political campaigns accounted for 35 percent of all outside spending in 2008, when interest groups spent a total of $87 million. But unions account for just 14 percent of outside spending this year, which has already reached $174 million, according to data from the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

    The shrinking political power of traditionally Democratic labor unions coincides with the rising influence, on the other end of the ideological spectrum, of billionaire businessmen and corporations that now spend three times as much as the labor groups.


    After Citizens United, it's down to about 14%.

    Let alone that Republican spending goes a lot further, because a lot of it goes into cheaper state-level campaigns, buying state legislative elections to ensure Republican state majorities that will gerrymander federal districts. And boy did that strategy work. Congressional Republicans got fewer votes than Democrats in the 2012 election, yet won the majority of seats.

    But, of course, in order to deceive and misrepresent reality, Bob, you gave us cherry-picked, tricky, and misleading information.

    Nice try, Bob. And desertmuscl.

    Hypocritical liars and cheats. All of you. icon_rolleyes.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 23, 2015 7:58 PM GMT
    jjguy05 said
    But, of course, in order to deceive and misrepresent reality, Bob, you gave us cherry-picked, tricky, and misleading information.


    Which, like a good confidence trickster, is what Bob3 regularly accuses others of doing. As for AryanH20P - usual nonsense.