Hillary Clinton steals the show at Iowa Democrats meet

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 16, 2015 7:53 AM GMT
    Former Secretary of State delivered the best speech of her presidential campaign at the Iowa Wing Dings dinner

    Standing before a giant American flag, her arms outstretched before the cheering crowd, she broke into a wide irrepressible smile.

    For the first time in a long time, in her life spent in the public eye, Hillary Clinton looked like she was enjoying herself.
    The Democratic presidential candidate has had a fraught relationship with Iowa. After leading in the polls in her 2007 presidential race, she came third in the Iowa caucuses, trailing behind Barack Obama in what she saw as a personal defeat; a betrayal by the Hawkeye state.

    But on Friday night at the Democratic Wing Ding dinner - an annual event designed to energise state volunteers for the party – past grievances were set aside, as the crowd showed they were ready for Hillary, to borrow her campaign slogan.

    "Don't let the circus distract you, if you look at their policies, most of the other candidates are just Trump without the pizzazz or the hair," she said.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-politics/11804972/Hillary-Clinton-laughs-off-emailgate-as-she-plays-down-drop-in-polls.html
  • TroyAthlete

    Posts: 4269

    Aug 16, 2015 6:39 PM GMT
    Republicans have no answer for this woman. They're just wishing and hoping that Democrats will turn on her, that's the entirety of their strategy. Hahaha. Pathetic.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 16, 2015 7:13 PM GMT
    TroyAthlete saidRepublicans have no answer for this woman. They're just wishing and hoping that Democrats will turn on her, that's the entirety of their strategy. Hahaha. Pathetic.


    As [Biden] looks at Hillary Rodham Clinton, is there any doubt that he wonders why so many Democrats have tried to smooth her path to the nomination while seeming to ignore him? Does she have longer experience, more authenticity, a firmer connection to the middle class? He has long been an advocate for the struggling middle class, and unlike Clinton, he has not become fabulously wealthy.

    She is truly in the 1%.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/as-biden-weighs-a-2016-campaign-does-he-want-to-be-the-anti-clinton/2015/08/15/01a58cd2-42cb-11e5-8ab4-c73967a143d3_story.html
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 16, 2015 7:31 PM GMT
    desertmuscl said
    She is truly in the 1%.

    All the 2016 Presidential contenders are in the 1%.

    The last time it wasn't was in the 1940s with Harry Truman. Who left the White House broke and nearly stayed that way until he died.
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14303

    Aug 16, 2015 8:40 PM GMT
    TroyAthlete saidRepublicans have no answer for this woman. They're just wishing and hoping that Democrats will turn on her, that's the entirety of their strategy. Hahaha. Pathetic.
    You are the one who is pathetic because you live in this fantasyland of the hapless Hillary ho becoming the first female President. You are dead wrong for saying that republicans have no answer for this woman. Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, and Donald Trump are far superior candidates to the unqualified, sociopathic, power hungry Hillary and if they play their cards right during the Presidential campaign, they could easily defeat the hapless Hillary ho in November 2016. Word to the wise, don't get your hopes so high. But than you don't know how to think.
  • bobbobbob

    Posts: 2812

    Aug 16, 2015 9:12 PM GMT
    TroyAthlete saidRepublicans have no answer for this woman. They're just wishing and hoping that Democrats will turn on her, that's the entirety of their strategy. Hahaha. Pathetic.


    HUH?

    Wanna talk about Hillary and answers?

    She has no answers about top secret material in her emails she has said tie and time again never contained top secret material.

    Has the bitch ever come up with answers for how the missing Rose Law Firm Billing records from Little Rock Arkansas that couldn't be found when President Bill and Hillary were being investigated suddenly were found by a White house worker in Hillary's library and turned over to the FBI

    Has the bitch ever come up with an answer about how $200,000 worth of furniture, TVs and silverware ended up in her moving van when she and Bill left the White House. Yes. The bitch said it was a mix up with the movers... Bullshit. It took 2 years for her trailer trash ass to send back half of it and pay for the rest.

    Has she ever come up with an answer about one damned thing she accomplished as Secretary of State. The best she's done so far is to say she flew around a lot which is not an accomplishment.

    Need me to give you more examples of Hillary and answers?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 16, 2015 10:09 PM GMT
    bobbobbob said
    She has no answers about top secret material in her emails she has said tie and time again never contained top secret material.


    I'm not going to trawl through the rest of your claims, as I don't have time, but you have misrepresented what Clinton said regarding her emails. Regarding her personal email account, Clinton has said she never received any material marked classified and that she had never sent any classified material on that account. There is no reason to think that is untrue. The Inspector General didn't say there was marked classified material among her emails, only that there was material which should have been marked as classified.

    Having had some experience regarding the handling of classified material, I would be amazed if the State Department did not use a 'stand alone' system for sending and receiving highly classified material. I therefore think it very unlikely that such material could have routinely found its way onto her private server. What probably did happen is that someone in her team inadvertently or negligently sent her (within an email or emails) information which should have carried a security classification , but did not.

    You are generally very quick to admonish anyone who rushes to judgment without evidence, yet you seem happy to disregard your own advice, especially when it comes to Clinton.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2015 3:37 AM GMT
    Art_Deco said
    desertmuscl said
    She is truly in the 1%.

    All the 2016 Presidential contenders are in the 1%.

    The last time it wasn't was in the 1940s with Harry Truman. Who left the White House broke and nearly stayed that way until he died.


    Bernie Sanders is not in the 1%.
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14303

    Aug 17, 2015 1:00 PM GMT
    Jasonfest said
    Art_Deco said
    desertmuscl said
    She is truly in the 1%.

    All the 2016 Presidential contenders are in the 1%.

    The last time it wasn't was in the 1940s with Harry Truman. Who left the White House broke and nearly stayed that way until he died.


    Bernie Sanders is not in the 1%.
    That is one of his many outstanding qualities that makes him more fit to be President of the U.S. than the hapless Hillary ho.
  • bobbobbob

    Posts: 2812

    Aug 17, 2015 7:50 PM GMT
    Ex_Mil8 said
    bobbobbob said
    She has no answers about top secret material in her emails she has said tie and time again never contained top secret material.


    I'm not going to trawl through the rest of your claims, as I don't have time, but you have misrepresented what Clinton said regarding her emails. Regarding her personal email account, Clinton has said she never received any material marked classified and that she had never sent any classified material on that account. There is no reason to think that is untrue. The Inspector General didn't say there was marked classified material among her emails, only that there was material which should have been marked as classified.

    Having had some experience regarding the handling of classified material, I would be amazed if the State Department did not use a 'stand alone' system for sending and receiving highly classified material. I therefore think it very unlikely that such material could have routinely found its way onto her private server. What probably did happen is that someone in her team inadvertently or negligently sent her (within an email or emails) information which should have carried a security classification , but did not.

    You are generally very quick to admonish anyone who rushes to judgment without evidence, yet you seem happy to disregard your own advice, especially when it comes to Clinton.


    Yeah?
    As of Monday, August 17th they've found 305 classified documents in the 20% of the emails she turned over to the state department. The FBI has already found two top secret documents on her scrubbed email server... Get you face out of Hillary antique twat and catch up on the news while you're spreading acne cream on your butt. It doesn't matter how they got on her server and in her emails when you get back to the fact that the bitch has consistently lied about ever receiving any and only destroying personal emails about yoga, a wedding, a funeral and hair appointments.... So why the hell would she attempt to scrub emails like that off a server???

    Don't you need to be finding a bus to stand in front of?
  • TroyAthlete

    Posts: 4269

    Aug 21, 2015 5:12 AM GMT
    roadbikeRob said
    TroyAthlete saidRepublicans have no answer for this woman. They're just wishing and hoping that Democrats will turn on her, that's the entirety of their strategy. Hahaha. Pathetic.
    You are the one who is pathetic because you live in this fantasyland of the hapless Hillary ho becoming the first female President. You are dead wrong for saying that republicans have no answer for this woman. Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, and Donald Trump are far superior candidates to the unqualified, sociopathic, power hungry Hillary and if they play their cards right during the Presidential campaign, they could easily defeat the hapless Hillary ho in November 2016. Word to the wise, don't get your hopes so high. But than you don't know how to think.


    Oh right, I'm going to take electoral prediction advice from the unskewed polls "Romney in a landslide" party pfft haha

    Jeb Bush -- last name Bush, unelectable, nuff said
    Marco Rubio -- inexperienced loon who thinks women should be forced to have their rapists' babies and said so on national TV, shortly after saying that Hillary has the best resume of any candidate, NEXT hahahaha #loser
    Donald Trump....baahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    Republicans are toast (again).
  • TroyAthlete

    Posts: 4269

    Aug 21, 2015 5:14 AM GMT
    bobbobbob said
    TroyAthlete saidRepublicans have no answer for this woman. They're just wishing and hoping that Democrats will turn on her, that's the entirety of their strategy. Hahaha. Pathetic.


    HUH?

    Wanna talk about Hillary and answers?

    She has no answers about top secret material in her emails she has said tie and time again never contained top secret material.

    Has the bitch ever come up with answers for how the missing Rose Law Firm Billing records from Little Rock Arkansas that couldn't be found when President Bill and Hillary were being investigated suddenly were found by a White house worker in Hillary's library and turned over to the FBI

    Has the bitch ever come up with an answer about how $200,000 worth of furniture, TVs and silverware ended up in her moving van when she and Bill left the White House. Yes. The bitch said it was a mix up with the movers... Bullshit. It took 2 years for her trailer trash ass to send back half of it and pay for the rest.

    Has she ever come up with an answer about one damned thing she accomplished as Secretary of State. The best she's done so far is to say she flew around a lot which is not an accomplishment.

    Need me to give you more examples of Hillary and answers?


    I'm not interested in right wing lies or "examples" of fake scandals from the 600 years ago when most members of the conservaposse were born -- and neither are American voters.

    NEXT!