Exposing a Hillary Clinton lie about sending, receiving, and storing classified emails

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 16, 2015 10:23 PM GMT
    “I did not e-mail any classified material to anyone on my e-mail. I’m certainly well aware of the classification requirements and did not send classified material.”

    Truth: Another claim made during that March 10 press conference that has fallen apart. After taking a random sample of 40 of Clinton’s e-mails, the inspector general for 17 spy agencies told Congress that two contained information deemed “Top Secret.”
    http://nypost.com/2015/08/16/hillary-clintons-5-e-mail-lies/

    ---------------------------

    Now she is changing her story to say she never handled material marked as classified. Not only is it inconsistent, but it doesn't matter much. She acknowledged and would be expected to know when something is classified, marked or not. One could argue there could be some subjectivity in borderline cases, but satellite imagery, etc. indicating sources and methods, would be clearly classified.

    Deliberate and negligent handling can be prosecuted as a crime. David Petraeus was prosecuted for much less, keeping his schedule in a desk drawer at home.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 16, 2015 10:41 PM GMT
    Same answer I gave to bobo:

    Regarding her personal email account, Clinton has said she never received any material marked classified and that she had never sent any classified material on that account. There is no reason to think that is untrue. The Inspector General didn't say there was marked classified material among her emails, only that there was material which should have been marked as classified.

    Having had some experience regarding the handling of classified material, I would be amazed if the State Department did not use a 'stand alone' system for sending and receiving highly classified material. I therefore think it very unlikely that such material could have routinely found its way onto her private server. What probably did happen is that someone in her team inadvertently or negligently sent her (within an email or emails) information which should have carried a security classification , but did not.

    As for your 'she should have known anyway' argument, I have seen classified information, which, if you took away the markings, would have seemed very innocuous. It is quite possible that someone in a high pressure job, reading through lots of information, for hours every day, could easily have missed the security implications of an email containing classified material, which was not marked as such.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 16, 2015 10:47 PM GMT
    southbeach1500 said
    socalfitness said
    Deliberate and negligent handling can be prosecuted as a crime. David Petraeus was prosecuted for much less, keeping his schedule in a desk drawer at home.
    Another good point.

    There is no doubt about whether information dealing with sources and methods, especially satellite imagery from the intel community, is classified, marked or not. I have been in the defense industry and the situation is obvious. You don't mistake Top Secret SCI for Unclassified. Laughable. As the other thread indicated, the vise is tightening.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 17, 2015 4:14 AM GMT
    southbeach1500 said
    socalfitness said
    southbeach1500 said
    socalfitness said
    Deliberate and negligent handling can be prosecuted as a crime. David Petraeus was prosecuted for much less, keeping his schedule in a desk drawer at home.
    Another good point.

    There is no doubt about whether information dealing with sources and methods, especially satellite imagery from the intel community, is classified, marked or not. I have been in the defense industry and the situation is obvious. You don't mistake Top Secret SCI for Unclassified. Laughable. As the other thread indicated, the vise is tightening.


    Not a good time to be Hillary.

    The vise is tightening.
  • bobbobbob

    Posts: 2812

    Aug 17, 2015 8:03 PM GMT


    Monday August 17th

    State Dept has found 305 classified emails in 20% of the 30,000 they've been through.

    The FBI has already identified TWO top secret documents on the email server the bitch and her bitchettes had scrubbed.. you know.. that emai server full of 30,000 emails about yoga, a funeral, a wedding, and hair appointments..BUT NO TOP SECRET DOCUMENTS... according to the bitch.

    But the Clinton Clit licking liberaggots are keeping busy with the faces still all up in her jurassic crack.