Judge Rules Prop. 8 Donations Be Made Public

  • metta

    Posts: 39104

    Jan 31, 2009 7:34 AM GMT

    http://cbs5.com/local/prop.8.donors.2.921636.html


    They should be made public by Monday. icon_biggrin.gif


    The current maps can be found here:

    http://www.eightmaps.com/
  • Tiller66

    Posts: 380

    Jan 31, 2009 10:12 AM GMT
    It's fine that they where made public but I just hope nobody uses the info for bad things.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 11:15 AM GMT
    I hope they use it for good things, like protests and boycotts. icon_biggrin.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 11:33 AM GMT
    It makes no sense to me why contributors personal information should be made public. Especially their home address. I do not agree with this Federal Judge's decision. He should be held responsible for any harm that should come to the door steps of Prop8 contributors. This is so stupidicon_evil.gif. They are free voters in a democracy not registered sex offenders.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 11:43 AM GMT
    Bakejenson saidIt makes no sense to me why contributors personal information should be made public. Especially their home address. I do not agree with this Federal Judge's decision. He should be held responsible for any harm that should come to the door steps of Prop8 contributors. This is so stupidicon_evil.gif. They are free voters in a democracy not registered sex offenders.


    Its the public's right to know who funds the campaigns. Besides, why should only one side of the campaign get their information protected and the other side without that same protection? That's not equal protection of the law.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 11:53 AM GMT
    Maverick75 said
    Bakejenson saidIt makes no sense to me why contributors personal information should be made public. Especially their home address. I do not agree with this Federal Judge's decision. He should be held responsible for any harm that should come to the door steps of Prop8 contributors. This is so stupidicon_evil.gif. They are free voters in a democracy not registered sex offenders.


    Its the public's right to know who funds the campaigns. Besides, why should only one side of the campaign get their information protected and the other side without that same protection? That's not equal protection of the law.


    Why do you need to know the home address of some housewife with 2 kids? So you are saying prior to this Federal Judge's decision the information of non-supporters of Prop8 was made public? Why is anybodies info supporter or not being made public. Now voters have to fear reprisal from the opposition for what they freely choose to support. I seriously doubt anybody wants to know the addresses of supporters so they can send them holiday cards.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 11:59 AM GMT
    Bakejenson said
    Maverick75 said
    Bakejenson saidIt makes no sense to me why contributors personal information should be made public. Especially their home address. I do not agree with this Federal Judge's decision. He should be held responsible for any harm that should come to the door steps of Prop8 contributors. This is so stupidicon_evil.gif. They are free voters in a democracy not registered sex offenders.


    Its the public's right to know who funds the campaigns. Besides, why should only one side of the campaign get their information protected and the other side without that same protection? That's not equal protection of the law.


    So you are saying prior to this Federal Judge's decision the information of non-supporters of Prop8 was made public?
    Any person or business who donated money for or against the Prop 8 campaign will have their info available to the public. Its always been like that for any campaign.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 12:17 PM GMT
    Excellent! Now I'll know from where I can recruit vulnerable mormon children into the homosexual lifestyle.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 12:27 PM GMT
    McGay saidExcellent! Now I'll know from where I can recruit vulnerable mormon children into the homosexual lifestyle.

    You are disgusting.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 12:31 PM GMT
    You are stupid.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 12:31 PM GMT
    Maverick75 said
    Bakejenson said
    Maverick75 said
    Bakejenson saidIt makes no sense to me why contributors personal information should be made public. Especially their home address. I do not agree with this Federal Judge's decision. He should be held responsible for any harm that should come to the door steps of Prop8 contributors. This is so stupidicon_evil.gif. They are free voters in a democracy not registered sex offenders.


    Its the public's right to know who funds the campaigns. Besides, why should only one side of the campaign get their information protected and the other side without that same protection? That's not equal protection of the law.


    So you are saying prior to this Federal Judge's decision the information of non-supporters of Prop8 was made public?
    Any person or business who donated money for or against the Prop 8 campaign will have their info available to the public. Its always been like that for any campaign.

    Hmmm I don't know the law well enough to know if that's true or not. I know your posts well enough to not buy off on anything you say though. I'll have to research this. Whatever happened to the Privacy Act of 1974? Didn't that cover things like this?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 12:32 PM GMT
    McGay saidYou are stupid.

    Still too hot for you old manicon_wink.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 12:33 PM GMT
    Actually, your muffin top is too big for me. I'm not into rubenesque.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 12:38 PM GMT
    McGay saidActually, your muffin top is too big for me. I'm not into rubenesque.

    Are you Claygaykenesque or is it just a coincidence?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 12:45 PM GMT
    Are you the Pillsbury Doughboy or is it just a coincidence?
    doughboy.jpg
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 12:54 PM GMT
    Are you 5yo or are just some kind of child predator?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 12:57 PM GMT
    Are you The Blob or just a close relative?
    the-blob.jpg
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 12:57 PM GMT
    Why shouldn't we know....it's not like anyone is going to throw a brick through the front window of the "lady with 2 kids" we can however avoid doing business with the companies and professionals that contributed to the fund.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 1:34 PM GMT
    Lapinblanc saidWhy shouldn't we know....it's not like anyone is going to throw a brick through the front window of the "lady with 2 kids" we can however avoid doing business with the companies and professionals that contributed to the fund.

    This does not depict a democracy. People should not have to be concerned about reprisal for the way they vote. You nor the Federal Judge can guarantee the safety of everybody on that list once it is out there for everybody to see and exploit how they please. Wanting to avoid business with companies that supported Prop8 is understandable. However, why is it necessary to know where some family who chose to support Prop8 lives. Angry humans are capable of much more than just a brick through the window and I wouldn't put as little as that past a bunch of pissed off gays.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 1:38 PM GMT
    McGay saidAre you The Blob or just a close relative?
    McDouche you are old, perverted, disgusting and weak. When you can bench 345, deadlift 495, and squat 455 you let me know. Till then stay away from LDS children and go put a shirt on. You have no muscle! Put down that chicken wing you call an arm.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 1:42 PM GMT
    Bukakejenson, you're fat, stupid, unattractive, unwitty, slimey, and suffer from micropenis. Getting your fat ass off the sofa and over to your PC does not qualify as weightlifting. Get a girdle and put on a bra.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 1:47 PM GMT
    McGay saidBukakejenson, you're fat, stupid, unattractive, unwitty, slimey, and suffer from micropenis. Getting your fat ass off the sofa and over to your PC does not qualify as weightlifting. Get a girdle and put on a bra.

    You make me less gayicon_confused.gif If Prop8 prevents queens like you from getting married then I support it as well. BTW I'm a Mac.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 1:49 PM GMT
    You? Less gay? Pshaw! Go to the encyclopedia and look up "gay". Your picture is right there. Don't be ashamed of being gay, but do be ashamed of being such a half baked half wit.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 1:55 PM GMT
    McGay saidYou? Less gay? Pshaw! Go to the encyclopedia and look up "gay". Your picture is right there. Don't be ashamed of being gay, but do be ashamed of being such a half baked half wit.

    No Bakejenson under gay but I did see your queer mug on Bitteroldqueen.com and homonobodyloves.org You are shockingly childish for one who cleared those days long long ago.icon_neutral.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 31, 2009 1:57 PM GMT
    Bakejenson said This does not depict a democracy. People should not have to be concerned about reprisal for the way they vote. You nor the Federal Judge can guarantee the safety of everybody on that list once it is out there for everybody to see .


    At the risk of getting caught in the middle of a foodfight:
    Voting and political contributions are different. Ballots must be secret because that's the only way to avoid voter intimidation.. Political contributions are public so voters can see if major donors have a corrupting effect on the political process. Transparency is always desirable where money and politics intersect.

    That said, Prop 8 opponents should learn from the backlash following some of their post-election excesses.