Nothing but close-ups in Porn

  • Pyre85

    Posts: 213

    Sep 26, 2015 10:46 PM GMT
    Why.
    I find that far too much of porn is from a vantage of no more than a foot away, tight shots of thrusting, with nothing else visible.
    Am I the only one who want's to see the bottoms face, lost in passion as he's slammed into a wall, or the tops hands latched onto a shoulder for leverage, head thrown back as he slams home?
    Or when they do show their face, and both look bored out of their minds, all but checking their watches to see if it's over yet. Passion is nowhere to be found, Intense, rough sex is great, but when you can see it's more effort than enjoyment.. how is that erotic? I'm not trying to watch someone do a chore.
    In many ways I think T.V sex scenes are far more erotic. They have no choice but to be steamy and erotic. They can't show erections, or penetration, so they rely on setting, and glorious erotic, passionate fervor. Is it real? no. Is it hotter? I think so.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 26, 2015 10:55 PM GMT
    Either they're paid by square inch of skin shown or now they contract out like a hand model or a voice over.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 26, 2015 11:20 PM GMT
    I agree. I don't find close-up shots arousing at all. It's the chemistry, facial expression, the overall big picture that get me. icon_redface.gificon_redface.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 27, 2015 5:45 AM GMT
    Find some vintage porn - older videos have a lot more long shots.
  • AMoonHawk

    Posts: 11406

    Sep 27, 2015 6:27 AM GMT
    more_kissing_from_karl_grande.jpeg?v=140
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 27, 2015 6:45 AM GMT
    I know I always want to see the face.