Hillary to be the Next President

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 22, 2015 7:20 PM GMT
    Inevitable now. Only the coronation is left.

    But, will there be an interruption in the Clinton Dynasty before the dems select Chelsea for president? Can we survive a few years without a Clinton as President, before it is time for President Charlotte to assume the throne? I don't know how the country will be able to handle it.

    Of course they will all be qualified, since the qualification to be President is being related to a Clinton as President.

    Will we get to the point where we need to appoint a regent to hold the office in an interregnum?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 22, 2015 7:25 PM GMT
    Puppenjunge saidInevitable now. Only the coronation is left.

    But, will there be an interruption in the Clinton Dynasty before the dems select Chelsea for president? Can we survive a few years without a Clinton as President, before it is time for President Charlotte to assume the throne? I don't know how the country will be able to handle it.

    Of course they will all be qualified, since the qualification to be President is being related to a Clinton as President.

    Will we get to the point where we need to appoint a regent to hold the office in an interregnum?


    Let me guess, you'd prefer a Bush Dynasty?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 22, 2015 7:30 PM GMT
    You forgot 8 years of Michelle Obama between Hillary and Chelsea. Really though I'm still not sure Hillary is electable. I don't trust anybody who can't smile. She looks maniacal when she tries to smile. Like the joker. And just wait til the skeletons start breaking down the closet doors. At least Trump is so outrageously unapologetic about everything that I figure there's no damaging secrets that he hasn't already bragged about.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 22, 2015 7:34 PM GMT
    timmm55 said
    Puppenjunge saidInevitable now. Only the coronation is left.

    But, will there be an interruption in the Clinton Dynasty before the dems select Chelsea for president? Can we survive a few years without a Clinton as President, before it is time for President Charlotte to assume the throne? I don't know how the country will be able to handle it.

    Of course they will all be qualified, since the qualification to be President is being related to a Clinton as President.

    Will we get to the point where we need to appoint a regent to hold the office in an interregnum?


    Let me guess, you'd prefer a Bush Dynasty?


    Of course not. We could do without any fuckin dynasties. No one should be allowed to become President or anything else, if a relative has held the job.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 22, 2015 7:39 PM GMT
    the OP; wanting to make america great again by chance?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 22, 2015 7:50 PM GMT
    Puppenjunge said
    timmm55 said
    Puppenjunge saidInevitable now. Only the coronation is left.

    But, will there be an interruption in the Clinton Dynasty before the dems select Chelsea for president? Can we survive a few years without a Clinton as President, before it is time for President Charlotte to assume the throne? I don't know how the country will be able to handle it.

    Of course they will all be qualified, since the qualification to be President is being related to a Clinton as President.

    Will we get to the point where we need to appoint a regent to hold the office in an interregnum?


    Let me guess, you'd prefer a Bush Dynasty?


    Of course not. We could do without any fuckin dynasties. No one should be allowed to become President or anything else, if a relative has held the job.


    J Q Adams? We have a history of that, with mixed results.
  • interestingch...

    Posts: 694

    Oct 22, 2015 8:13 PM GMT
    DefensiveEnd saidYou forgot 8 years of Michelle Obama between Hillary and Chelsea. Really though I'm still not sure Hillary is electable. I don't trust anybody who can't smile. She looks maniacal when she tries to smile. Like the joker. And just wait til the skeletons start breaking down the closet doors. At least Trump is so outrageously unapologetic about everything that I figure there's no damaging secrets that he hasn't already bragged about.


    Being from the UK I am not sure of everyone running but you have a point in some respects about trump, he is a very successful businessman and that could be good for the country, Hilary on the other hand has had a hard time, been publicly humiliated by her husband but as I expect she was the brains behind the two of them and nothing bad happened while he was in office apart from his relations with that woman, that was a slight quote if you remember. She remained very dignified throughout all that and has made her a better kinder and stronger person for it. I think if Bush got in that would be a very big mistake, he is evil, I am sure of that, he was in charge of security for the twin towers when they came down and I am almost certain he had something to do with all that and the subsequent invasion of Iraq for the oil with the help of the Binladen family whom they are in business with, so unless you want a world war, do not vote for him.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 22, 2015 8:36 PM GMT
    Puppenjunge saidInevitable now. Only the coronation is left.

    But, will there be an interruption in the Clinton Dynasty before the dems select Chelsea for president? Can we survive a few years without a Clinton as President, before it is time for President Charlotte to assume the throne? I don't know how the country will be able to handle it.

    Of course they will all be qualified, since the qualification to be President is being related to a Clinton as President.

    Will we get to the point where we need to appoint a regent to hold the office in an interregnum?


    Hillary is related to Bill by marriage, not blood. That certainly helped open doors for her but her listed qualifications are her own: Senator, Secretary of State. Regardless of how she got there, she did those jobs without shitting the bed. I think she would be a successful, pragmatic, centrist (maybe with a left bent) president.

    Having said that, I don't get a warm and fuzzy from her either. Her smile does seem fake. I think a lot of people sense that and that's part of her problem. She's surely aware of this by now but ultimately not everyone can be charismatic. She's just going to have to work with her other assets.

    To me, she's still more trustworthy than any Republican before us, with respect to the Supreme Court in particular. I'll swallow my lack of enthusiasm and show up on election day to try to keep them away from the oval office. She's not going to change our politics in the current climate but she'll keep us afloat for another 4-8. It's the best we can do.

    Bringing Chelsea into it is silly. She hasn't run for any office or expressed the interest to do so to my knowledge.
  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Oct 22, 2015 9:55 PM GMT
    pellaz saidthe OP; wanting to make america great again by chance?


    no, by fiat icon_lol.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 22, 2015 10:30 PM GMT
    I've been watching the CNN coverage of Clinton's testimony and I can affirmatively say that she's made the majority of the Republican congressmen on the Benghazi committee look like high school sophomores. Why do they look so nervous? As a litigator myself, if my client saw me perform like that, my client would spit on my face and fire me immediately. So far, the Republicans on the committee is giving Clinton props for her presidential run.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 22, 2015 10:37 PM GMT
    DefensiveEnd saidYou forgot 8 years of Michelle Obama between Hillary and Chelsea. Really though I'm still not sure Hillary is electable. I don't trust anybody who can't smile. She looks maniacal when she tries to smile. Like the joker. And just wait til the skeletons start breaking down the closet doors. At least Trump is so outrageously unapologetic about everything that I figure there's no damaging secrets that he hasn't already bragged about.



    I agree. She's no teddy bear. I prefer my leaders to show some kind of personality, but then again I know some very intelligent and capable people who are so focused on their goals they also come across like this. Problem is, I'd still rather see someone with little personality win who's capable than some charismatic jackwad who doesn't know what they're doing.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 22, 2015 10:49 PM GMT
    interestingchap said
    DefensiveEnd saidYou forgot 8 years of Michelle Obama between Hillary and Chelsea. Really though I'm still not sure Hillary is electable. I don't trust anybody who can't smile. She looks maniacal when she tries to smile. Like the joker. And just wait til the skeletons start breaking down the closet doors. At least Trump is so outrageously unapologetic about everything that I figure there's no damaging secrets that he hasn't already bragged about.


    Being from the UK I am not sure of everyone running but you have a point in some respects about trump, he is a very successful businessman and that could be good for the country, Hilary on the other hand has had a hard time, been publicly humiliated by her husband but as I expect she was the brains behind the two of them and nothing bad happened while he was in office apart from his relations with that woman, that was a slight quote if you remember. She remained very dignified throughout all that and has made her a better kinder and stronger person for it. I think if Bush got in that would be a very big mistake, he is evil, I am sure of that, he was in charge of security for the twin towers when they came down and I am almost certain he had something to do with all that and the subsequent invasion of Iraq for the oil with the help of the Binladen family whom they are in business with, so unless you want a world war, do not vote for him.


    "he was in charge of security for the twin towers when they came down "

    In addition to governor of Florida from 1999 to 2007 or was that his part time job?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 22, 2015 10:51 PM GMT
    JackBoneTX said
    Puppenjunge saidInevitable now. Only the coronation is left.

    But, will there be an interruption in the Clinton Dynasty before the dems select Chelsea for president? Can we survive a few years without a Clinton as President, before it is time for President Charlotte to assume the throne? I don't know how the country will be able to handle it.

    Of course they will all be qualified, since the qualification to be President is being related to a Clinton as President.

    Will we get to the point where we need to appoint a regent to hold the office in an interregnum?


    Hillary is related to Bill by marriage, not blood. That certainly helped open doors for her but her listed qualifications are her own: Senator, Secretary of State. Regardless of how she got there, she did those jobs without shitting the bed. I think she would be a successful, pragmatic, centrist (maybe with a left bent) president.

    Having said that, I don't get a warm and fuzzy from her either. Her smile does seem fake. I think a lot of people sense that and that's part of her problem. She's surely aware of this by now but ultimately not everyone can be charismatic. She's just going to have to work with her other assets.

    To me, she's still more trustworthy than any Republican before us, with respect to the Supreme Court in particular. I'll swallow my lack of enthusiasm and show up on election day to try to keep them away from the oval office. She's not going to change our politics in the current climate but she'll keep us afloat for another 4-8. It's the best we can do.

    Bringing Chelsea into it is silly. She hasn't run for any office or expressed the interest to do so to my knowledge.


    And she'll be running against George P Bush.

    icon_wink.gificon_eek.gificon_wink.gificon_eek.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 22, 2015 10:54 PM GMT
    JackBoneTX said
    Puppenjunge saidInevitable now. Only the coronation is left.

    But, will there be an interruption in the Clinton Dynasty before the dems select Chelsea for president? Can we survive a few years without a Clinton as President, before it is time for President Charlotte to assume the throne? I don't know how the country will be able to handle it.

    Of course they will all be qualified, since the qualification to be President is being related to a Clinton as President.

    Will we get to the point where we need to appoint a regent to hold the office in an interregnum?


    Hillary is related to Bill by marriage, not blood. That certainly helped open doors for her but her listed qualifications are her own: Senator, Secretary of State. Regardless of how she got there, she did those jobs without shitting the bed. I think she would be a successful, pragmatic, centrist (maybe with a left bent) president.

    Having said that, I don't get a warm and fuzzy from her either. Her smile does seem fake. I think a lot of people sense that and that's part of her problem. She's surely aware of this by now but ultimately not everyone can be charismatic. She's just going to have to work with her other assets.

    To me, she's still more trustworthy than any Republican before us, with respect to the Supreme Court in particular. I'll swallow my lack of enthusiasm and show up on election day to try to keep them away from the oval office. She's not going to change our politics in the current climate but she'll keep us afloat for another 4-8. It's the best we can do.

    Bringing Chelsea into it is silly. She hasn't run for any office or expressed the interest to do so to my knowledge.


    "Bill by marriage, not blood. That certainly helped open doors for her but her listed qualifications are her own: Senator, Secretary of State."

    That's certainly the understatement of the day .... maybe the week (but we have one more day to go).

    So you really think she would have been SoS if not married to Bill or Senator 'from' NY?
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14354

    Oct 22, 2015 10:57 PM GMT
    The OP is an idiot. The hapless Hillary ho is not going to be our next President. Keep living in your ultra leftist fantasyland. This decrepit bitch is incompetent, untrustworthy, and unelectable. The last thing this great country needs is the ethically challenged, corrupt Clinton family back in the White House. Anyone but the hapless Hillary ho for President. The GOP needs to stop wasting valuable time on this goddamned Benghazi incident and focus solely on the pressing issues of today. They also need to stop pandering to the narrow minded bible thumping screwballs.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 23, 2015 10:26 PM GMT
    roadbikeRob saidThe OP is an idiot.


    Right - I'm an idiot - and RoadrageBob knows absolutely nothing about american politics. Barring an intervening accident or heretofore undiscovered major scandal, Hillary will be the next US president, whether he likes her or not, despite her arrogance, deceitfulness, and sense of entitlement. None of the current republican candidates is electable. And to insure their defeat, the republicans have written off the latino vote - larger than the last time - they may not even carry Texas next year.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 23, 2015 10:35 PM GMT
    JackBoneTX said
    Puppenjunge saidInevitable now. Only the coronation is left.

    But, will there be an interruption in the Clinton Dynasty before the dems select Chelsea for president? Can we survive a few years without a Clinton as President, before it is time for President Charlotte to assume the throne? I don't know how the country will be able to handle it.

    Of course they will all be qualified, since the qualification to be President is being related to a Clinton as President.

    Will we get to the point where we need to appoint a regent to hold the office in an interregnum?


    Bringing Chelsea into it is silly. She hasn't run for any office or expressed the interest to do so to my knowledge.

    Hardly. She's too young now, and still milking the network job she got because of who who parents are. She won't run in 8 years - but she has plenty of time to prepare for 16 years from now. Of course I don't know her thoughts - but who would have predicted that idiot guy who was born with the silver foot in his mouth - Bush 43, had serious political ambitions when his papa was first running for office? He didn't come on to the political scene until Karl Rove "created" him.
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14354

    Oct 23, 2015 10:57 PM GMT
    Puppenjunge said
    roadbikeRob saidThe OP is an idiot.


    Right - I'm an idiot - and RoadrageBob knows absolutely nothing about american politics. Barring an intervening accident or heretofore undiscovered major scandal, Hillary will be the next US president, whether he likes her or not, despite her arrogance, deceitfulness, and sense of entitlement. None of the current republican candidates is electable. And to insure their defeat, the republicans have written off the latino vote - larger than the last time - they may not even carry Texas next year.
    If anyone knows nothing about American politics, it is the OP. Hillary is not going to be the next President. As for Texas, you are wrong because that state will always vote republican because the religious right has a powerful grip on all political institutions in that state. I used to live in Texas. Most Texans detest the Clintons so chances of this incompetent whore carrying the lone star state is slim to none. Hillary is not electable in fact she is even worse than some of the stupid republican candidates. You are a fucking moron. Stop poisoning the forums with your fantasyland gibberish.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 23, 2015 11:06 PM GMT
    Just tell me???

    Why is it so important to you and others in this forum that Hillary becomes president?

    What could she do.....that's hasn't been tried, done or worn out!!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 24, 2015 12:09 AM GMT
    roadbikeRob said
    Puppenjunge said
    roadbikeRob saidThe OP is an idiot.


    Right - I'm an idiot - and RoadrageBob knows absolutely nothing about american politics. Barring an intervening accident or heretofore undiscovered major scandal, Hillary will be the next US president, whether he likes her or not, despite her arrogance, deceitfulness, and sense of entitlement. None of the current republican candidates is electable. And to insure their defeat, the republicans have written off the latino vote - larger than the last time - they may not even carry Texas next year.
    If anyone knows nothing about American politics, it is the OP. Hillary is not going to be the next President. As for Texas, you are wrong because that state will always vote republican because the religious right has a powerful grip on all political institutions in that state. I used to live in Texas. Most Texans detest the Clintons so chances of this incompetent whore carrying the lone star state is slim to none. Hillary is not electable in fact she is even worse than some of the stupid republican candidates. You are a fucking moron. Stop poisoning the forums with your fantasyland gibberish.


    Roadrage - I "poison" the forums with a lot less bile than thou. You are not on ignore, only because once in a while, I need a good laugh from reading what you post.
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14354

    Oct 24, 2015 3:19 AM GMT
    Puppenjunge said
    roadbikeRob said
    Puppenjunge said
    roadbikeRob saidThe OP is an idiot.


    Right - I'm an idiot - and RoadrageBob knows absolutely nothing about american politics. Barring an intervening accident or heretofore undiscovered major scandal, Hillary will be the next US president, whether he likes her or not, despite her arrogance, deceitfulness, and sense of entitlement. None of the current republican candidates is electable. And to insure their defeat, the republicans have written off the latino vote - larger than the last time - they may not even carry Texas next year.
    If anyone knows nothing about American politics, it is the OP. Hillary is not going to be the next President. As for Texas, you are wrong because that state will always vote republican because the religious right has a powerful grip on all political institutions in that state. I used to live in Texas. Most Texans detest the Clintons so chances of this incompetent whore carrying the lone star state is slim to none. Hillary is not electable in fact she is even worse than some of the stupid republican candidates. You are a fucking moron. Stop poisoning the forums with your fantasyland gibberish.


    Roadrage - I "poison" the forums with a lot less bile than thou. You are not on ignore, only because once in a while, I need a good laugh from reading what you post.
    The only bile on here is your nonsensical bullshit stating that Hillary is going to be the next President when you damn well know that it is very premature to make such a statement. She is the least qualified of all the candidates to be President. If anyone is the big joke around here well you need to stand in front of a mirror and you will see a big joke. Now shut your mouth and go fuck yourself.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 24, 2015 4:40 AM GMT
    roadbikeRob said
    Puppenjunge said
    roadbikeRob said
    Puppenjunge said
    roadbikeRob saidThe OP is an idiot.


    Right - I'm an idiot - and RoadrageBob knows absolutely nothing about american politics. Barring an intervening accident or heretofore undiscovered major scandal, Hillary will be the next US president, whether he likes her or not, despite her arrogance, deceitfulness, and sense of entitlement. None of the current republican candidates is electable. And to insure their defeat, the republicans have written off the latino vote - larger than the last time - they may not even carry Texas next year.
    If anyone knows nothing about American politics, it is the OP. Hillary is not going to be the next President. As for Texas, you are wrong because that state will always vote republican because the religious right has a powerful grip on all political institutions in that state. I used to live in Texas. Most Texans detest the Clintons so chances of this incompetent whore carrying the lone star state is slim to none. Hillary is not electable in fact she is even worse than some of the stupid republican candidates. You are a fucking moron. Stop poisoning the forums with your fantasyland gibberish.


    Roadrage - I "poison" the forums with a lot less bile than thou. You are not on ignore, only because once in a while, I need a good laugh from reading what you post.
    The only bile on here is your nonsensical bullshit stating that Hillary is going to be the next President when you damn well know that it is very premature to make such a statement. She is the least qualified of all the candidates to be President. If anyone is the big joke around here well you need to stand in front of a mirror and you will see a big joke. Now shut your mouth and go fuck yourself.


    If anyone is the big joke around here well you need to stand in front of a mirror and you will see a big joke. Now shut your mouth and go fuck yourself
    Most excitement I have heard in a long time.....from you!! hahaicon_eek.gif

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 24, 2015 12:30 PM GMT
    I'm still feeling the Bern!