Angry Bride Fires Wedding Photographers As They Support Gay Marriage But She Didn’t Expect This

  • metta

    Posts: 39118

    Nov 13, 2015 6:00 PM GMT
    Angry Bride Fires Wedding Photographers As They Support Gay Marriage But She Didn’t Expect This


    http://www.upmoments.com/angry-bride-fires-wedding-photographers/


    Brentwood Photography
    http://www.brentwoodphotography.com/

    https://www.facebook.com/BrentwoodPhotography?_rdr=p
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 14, 2015 1:33 PM GMT
    A perfect response! Ironically, she probably gave the photographer some free advertising.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 14, 2015 1:52 PM GMT
    That was BRILLIANT!

    Cheers,

    Sean
  • jeepguySD

    Posts: 651

    Nov 14, 2015 3:20 PM GMT
    Well played, Brentwood Photography!
  • tazzari

    Posts: 2937

    Nov 14, 2015 7:15 PM GMT
    "Angry Bride Wedding Photographers" would be a great name for a startup!
  • FRE0

    Posts: 4864

    Nov 14, 2015 8:07 PM GMT
    From the article:

    "My fiancé and I support traditional marriage between a man and a woman and I don't want our money going to a place that supports otherwise."

    Has anyone else noticed how often this nonsense is repeated? Clearly these people are unable to state their positions logically. The fact that one supports "traditional" marriage does not logically mean or imply that one rejects same-sex marriage. Probably most of us here do support "traditional" marriage between a man and a woman, but we also support same-sex marriage.

    What these people really mean is that the don't support same-sex marriage; they should say so.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 14, 2015 8:28 PM GMT
    They are great photographers! Their talent shouldn't be wasted on tripe like them.
  • tazzari

    Posts: 2937

    Nov 14, 2015 9:55 PM GMT
    FRE0 saidFrom the article:

    "My fiancé and I support traditional marriage between a man and a woman and I don't want our money going to a place that supports otherwise."

    Has anyone else noticed how often this nonsense is repeated? Clearly these people are unable to state their positions logically. The fact that one supports "traditional" marriage does not logically mean or imply that one rejects same-sex marriage. Probably most of us here do support "traditional" marriage between a man and a woman, but we also support same-sex marriage.

    What these people really mean is that the don't support same-sex marriage; they should say so.


    Very well put. But yet another example of the right grabbing the phrase -"pro-life" is another example.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 15, 2015 2:04 AM GMT
    GTPSean saidThat was BRILLIANT!

    Cheers,

    Sean


    +1, hahaha, yup- well DONE!!!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 15, 2015 4:18 AM GMT
    tazzari said
    FRE0 saidFrom the article:

    "My fiancé and I support traditional marriage between a man and a woman and I don't want our money going to a place that supports otherwise."

    Has anyone else noticed how often this nonsense is repeated? Clearly these people are unable to state their positions logically. The fact that one supports "traditional" marriage does not logically mean or imply that one rejects same-sex marriage. Probably most of us here do support "traditional" marriage between a man and a woman, but we also support same-sex marriage.

    What these people really mean is that the don't support same-sex marriage; they should say so.


    Very well put. But yet another example of the right grabbing the phrase -"pro-life" is another example.


    It probably came from Frank Luntz. He's often hired by conservatives to show them how not to talk like assholes while retaining the actual positions of assholes :p
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 15, 2015 4:42 AM GMT
    This made my night
  • hebrewman

    Posts: 1367

    Nov 15, 2015 2:53 PM GMT
    Love the response. I bet her head exploded!!!!
  • shutoman

    Posts: 505

    Nov 15, 2015 5:08 PM GMT
    Sublime response.

    Also damn fine photographer. I hope he's besieged with work!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 15, 2015 5:52 PM GMT
    tazzari said"Angry Bride Wedding Photographers" would be a great name for a startup!


    Nah, too close grammatically to "Angry Bird Wedding Photographers"
  • FRE0

    Posts: 4864

    Nov 17, 2015 7:31 PM GMT
    tazzari said
    FRE0 saidFrom the article:

    "My fiancé and I support traditional marriage between a man and a woman and I don't want our money going to a place that supports otherwise."

    Has anyone else noticed how often this nonsense is repeated? Clearly these people are unable to state their positions logically. The fact that one supports "traditional" marriage does not logically mean or imply that one rejects same-sex marriage. Probably most of us here do support "traditional" marriage between a man and a woman, but we also support same-sex marriage.

    What these people really mean is that the don't support same-sex marriage; they should say so.


    Very well put. But yet another example of the right grabbing the phrase -"pro-life" is another example.


    Many of the "pro lifers" seem to be pro life only where the unborn are concerned. One the child is born they seem to care no longer. I am not the only one who has pointed that out.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 21, 2015 9:53 PM GMT
    Well, at least she didn't throw him off a building while ululating and screaming "God is great!"

    His response was on the money.