They've Nailed Every Presidential Election Since 1975. They Say Our Next President Will Be....

  • metta

    Posts: 39107

    Dec 09, 2015 6:21 AM GMT
    THEY’VE NAILED EVERY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION SINCE 1975. THEY SAY OUR NEXT PRESIDENT WILL BE…


    http://news.groopspeak.com/theyve-nailed-every-presidential-election-since-1975-they-say-our-next-president-will-be/
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 09, 2015 6:28 AM GMT
    theantijock%20engage%20stalker%20reducti

    He's my favorite so far. His getting the primary might surprise me a little. But his getting the presidency would not surprise me at all.

    I just listened to that youtube of trump "defending" himself. If I had to listen to four years of that, I'd laugh myself to death in the first six months.
  • musclmed

    Posts: 3280

    Dec 09, 2015 9:12 AM GMT
    So if your looking for a half truth from the democratic underground. Follow Metta.

    They have actually only run three of these mock elections since 1975, and all in years when Democrats won. Two of the three were for Obama. This time they gave Jeb Bush - who has no shot at the GOP nomination - 38% of the vote, and states like Wyoming - which has only gone blue once since the 1950s - to Sanders.

    Hawaii to Republicans... Hah... SC to democrats, welcom to the twilight zone.

    When they say they got it right? How on earth did they predict John McCain as a candidate? He was down for the count before he took the nomination.

    There is no published data on these prior elections. But if you believe it , which I do not they had a 1/8 chance of getting it right and maybe they did.

  • ASHDOD

    Posts: 1057

    Dec 09, 2015 11:01 AM GMT
    well, this time they will fail. a politician that calls himself a socialist in the u.s?? no way
  • JackNNJ

    Posts: 1051

    Dec 09, 2015 1:46 PM GMT
    Hillary got an ambassador killed, which disqualifies her, but she will become prez nonetheless. It's written in the stars, surely prophesied from of old.
  • NerdLifter

    Posts: 1509

    Dec 09, 2015 2:44 PM GMT
    Ashdod saidwell, this time they will fail. a politician that calls himself a socialist in the u.s?? no way

    Democratic Socialist*, there is a big difference between Socialism and Democratic Socialism. But I understand you probably meant more of a "someone calls himself [with socialist in the title, and people are so shallow they don't actually do any research, so] no way". You'd be surprised though, the word "socialism" is not longer viewed as the proverbial boogie man by most younger individuals.

    Conversely, the term "Capitalism" now polls rather poorly, so much so that you might notice that conservative republicans and fox news now avoids using the term "Capitalist".

    Anyways, this is what happens when you have the vast majority of wealth redistributed from the middle class to the most wealthy individuals and corporations through legalized corruption. Of course, I am sure I am going to get a lot of flack on here for saying that.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 09, 2015 2:45 PM GMT
    metta saidTHEY’VE NAILED EVERY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION SINCE 1975. THEY SAY OUR NEXT PRESIDENT WILL BE…


    http://news.groopspeak.com/theyve-nailed-every-presidential-election-since-1975-they-say-our-next-president-will-be/


    Given that you've repeated the article title three times and once in all caps, certainly you have something to say about it? No?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 09, 2015 2:51 PM GMT
    Silliest thing I've seen in a long time. Sanders wouldn't pick same geographic VP unless it was Warren. Bush wouldn't pick fellow Floridian Rubio any more than Kasich would pick Portman .

    And the far left candidate win the Great Plains states, WY, ID and UT. And the GOP wins HI. No wonder you didn't comment
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 09, 2015 8:00 PM GMT
    I would not be surprised. The man substantiates his policies far better than his opponents. He also had the guts to present his speech at Liberty University knowing that the majority of the school's demographic would be in opposition. I have not seen that sense of boldness and sincerity to reach common understanding with opponents from the other candidates. The man earns my respect.
  • ASHDOD

    Posts: 1057

    Dec 09, 2015 10:06 PM GMT
    NerdLifter said
    Ashdod saidwell, this time they will fail. a politician that calls himself a socialist in the u.s?? no way

    Democratic Socialist*, there is a big difference between Socialism and Democratic Socialism. But I understand you probably meant more of a "someone calls himself [with socialist in the title, and people are so shallow they don't actually do any research, so] no way". You'd be surprised though, the word "socialism" is not longer viewed as the proverbial boogie man by most younger individuals.

    Conversely, the term "Capitalism" now polls rather poorly, so much so that you might notice that conservative republicans and fox news now avoids using the term "Capitalist".

    Anyways, this is what happens when you have the vast majority of wealth redistributed from the middle class to the most wealthy individuals and corporations through legalized corruption. Of course, I am sure I am going to get a lot of flack on here for saying that.


    Unfortunatly , i dont have the same trust in the wisdom of the voting public,in general. icon_sad.gif
    i remember even the word liberal was considerd a curse
  • jjguy05

    Posts: 459

    Dec 11, 2015 4:32 AM GMT
    wiu_2015_general_results.jpg?resize=609%

    Illinois, Maryland, and Hawaii will vote Republican. Oklahoma and Utah (reddest states in the country) will vote for Sanders of all Democrats.

    Ummmm, yeeeaaaahhh. Okay.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 11, 2015 5:13 AM GMT
    metta saidTHEY’VE NAILED EVERY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION SINCE 1975. THEY SAY OUR NEXT PRESIDENT WILL BE…


    http://news.groopspeak.com/theyve-nailed-every-presidential-election-since-1975-they-say-our-next-president-will-be/


    In all CAPS so must be important to you, but Metta, how on earth is this defensible?