The Nazi Connection to U.S. Gun Control

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 06, 2016 7:51 PM GMT
    "The title of this article is sure to get some people riled up as often happens anytime gun control or anything to do with Nazi’s is mentioned often does. However, to suggest a connection between the two means is crazy, vile and deserving of ridicule…unless you have read history. ...."

    https://genesiscnc.com/the-nazi-connection-to-u-s-gun-control/
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 06, 2016 10:48 PM GMT
    Read up on Prescott Bush (Busche).
  • interestingch...

    Posts: 694

    Jan 06, 2016 11:00 PM GMT
    jock203 saidRead up on Prescott Bush (Busche).


    Presscott Bush was a Nazi and started the CIA of which runs the US and trains the rebel forces to unhinge the middle east, the Nazi ideal is still in force and the bush family are all involved, who do you think was responsible for 911 and the subsequent 1 million + people killed in Iraq who had nothing to do with attacking the US,
    when are people going to wake up and see whats going on right under their noses
    Vote for Trump, he actually gives a shit and cares for people and the country, he isn't perfect but worth the risk.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 1:24 AM GMT
    I was just reading this article: The American Worship of Guns and Its Connection to Small Penises.

    The article is pretty compelling.
  • oldfart

    Posts: 328

    Jan 07, 2016 1:32 AM GMT
    Really? I mean really?
  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Jan 07, 2016 1:32 AM GMT
    interestingchap said
    jock203 saidRead up on Prescott Bush (Busche).


    Presscott Bush was a Nazi and started the CIA of which runs the US and trains the rebel forces to unhinge the middle east, the Nazi ideal is still in force and the bush family are all involved, who do you think was responsible for 911 and the subsequent 1 million + people killed in Iraq who had nothing to do with attacking the US,
    when are people going to wake up and see whats going on right under their noses
    Vote for Trump, he actually gives a shit and cares for people and the country, he isn't perfect but worth the risk.


    Prescott Bush did not start the CIA, the CIA is just an offshoot of the World War 2 era OSS
  • HndsmKansan

    Posts: 16311

    Jan 07, 2016 1:48 AM GMT
    mickeytopogigio saidI was just reading this article: The American Worship of Guns and Its Connection to Small Penises.

    The article is pretty compelling.



    LOL.. well said.. sometimes I just can't believe what I see here.

    icon_lol.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 1:53 AM GMT
    mickeytopogigio saidI was just reading this article: The American Worship of Guns and Its Connection to Small Penises.

    The article is pretty compelling.

    You're proof that to every rule, there is an exception, or in your case, a little exception.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 1:59 AM GMT
    mickeytopogigio saidI was just reading this article: The American Worship of Guns and Its Connection to Small Penises.

    The article is pretty compelling.


    I've heard and seen any number of comments about men compensating for small penis size. Those include:

    * Large trucks
    * Sports cars
    * Large or powerful dogs (e.g. pit bulls)
    * Guns
    * Expensive or fast boats
    * Hunters - e.g. bow hunting
    * Big muscles/working out (bodybuilders have small dicks)

    I'm sure there are others. I think it tends to say more about the prejudices and insecurities of the person criticizing than the object of the criticism.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 2:07 AM GMT
    rkyjockdn said
    mickeytopogigio saidI was just reading this article: The American Worship of Guns and Its Connection to Small Penises.

    The article is pretty compelling.


    I've heard and seen any number of comments about men compensating for small penis size. Those include:

    * Large trucks
    * Sports cars
    * Large or powerful dogs (e.g. pit bulls)
    * Guns
    * Expensive or fast boats
    * Hunters - e.g. bow hunting
    * Big muscles/working out (bodybuilders have small dicks)

    I'm sure there are others. I think it tends to say more about the prejudices and insecurities of the person criticizing than the object of the criticism.

    Excellent point. The RJ population appears to contain many with insecurities, inferiority complexes, and various personality disorders including mental illness.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 2:08 AM GMT
    rkyjockdn saidI think it tends to say more about the prejudices and insecurities of the person criticizing than the object of the criticism.


    Or, you could pretend you're gay for a second and insist he prove he does not have a small dick. Perhaps that criticism hit YOU too closely?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 2:09 AM GMT
    southbeach1500 said
    socalfitness said
    mickeytopogigio saidI was just reading this article: The American Worship of Guns and Its Connection to Small Penises.

    The article is pretty compelling.

    You're proof that to every rule, there is an exception, or in your case, a little exception.


    Ha!

    * Though you've likely pushed him into another one of his uncontrollable rages. icon_lol.gif

    The rage is one of his reactions. He has also disappeared like a cockroach finding a crack in a wall.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 2:10 AM GMT
    mickeytopogigio said
    rkyjockdn saidI think it tends to say more about the prejudices and insecurities of the person criticizing than the object of the criticism.


    Or, you could pretend you're gay for a second and insist he prove he does not have a small dick. Perhaps that criticism hit YOU too closely?

    Is that the best you can do, Mr. Low IQ?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 2:15 AM GMT
    socalfitness saidIs that the best you can do, Mr. Low IQ?


    Well, yes. Do I need a high IQ to hand you your ass?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 2:18 AM GMT
    mickeytopogigio said
    socalfitness saidIs that the best you can do, Mr. Low IQ?


    Well, yes. Do I need a high IQ to hand you your ass?

    All you do is demonstrate your own stupidity and insecurities.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 2:21 AM GMT
    socalfitness said
    mickeytopogigio said
    socalfitness saidIs that the best you can do, Mr. Low IQ?


    Well, yes. Do I need a high IQ to hand you your ass?

    All you do is demonstrate your own stupidity and insecurities.


    Ouch. Now, about your small penis...
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 2:29 AM GMT
    Anyway, for some perspective, because Godwin's Law is always a good place to start when making an argument against gun control, here's a graph of homicide (and weapon used) per 100,000 people:

    Graph-1.png
  • oldfart

    Posts: 328

    Jan 07, 2016 3:07 AM GMT
    rkyjockdn said
    mickeytopogigio saidI was just reading this article: The American Worship of Guns and Its Connection to Small Penises.
    The article is pretty compelling.

    I've heard and seen any number of comments about men compensating for small penis size. Those include:

    * Large trucks
    * Sports cars
    * Large or powerful dogs (e.g. pit bulls)
    * Guns
    * Expensive or fast boats
    * Hunters - e.g. bow hunting
    * Big muscles/working out (bodybuilders have small dicks)

    I'm sure there are others. I think it tends to say more about the prejudices and insecurities of the person criticizing than the object of the criticism.

    Does Camo count? It's my favorite color.

    Wanna see my dick?

    PS That article is rife with grammatical errors.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 3:43 AM GMT
    Yikes. The article does not mention that circumcised penises were used to identify Jews in Nazi Germany. And that is the reason why after the War Jews in the medical profession pressed to have all males in the US circumcised. Never again would circumcision be used to sort them out.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 4:50 AM GMT
    Alpha13 saidYikes. The article does not mention that circumcised penises were used to identify Jews in Nazi Germany. And that is the reason why after the War Jews in the medical profession pressed to have all males in the US circumcised. Never again would circumcision be used to sort them out.


    American Military males and their offspring began having their genitals mutilated in mass by Democrat Woodrow Wilson's administration during WW1.

    I was born at Ft. Dix in 1958 when the US Military still REQUIRED babies born in military hospitals to have their genitals mutilated without anesthesia.

    Liberals US Government Democrats, supporters of Islam and Judaism continue to recommend genital mutilation of males in the US:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/morten-frisch/time-for-us-parents-to-reconsider-the-acceptability-of-infant-male-circumcision_b_7031972.html

    Circumcision is a barbaric attack on helpless male babies worthy of ISIS.
  • psustud

    Posts: 111

    Jan 07, 2016 5:02 AM GMT
    I'm sorry but after reading all of this very well written article I still find the connection BS.

    It talks about gun control in terms of taking guns away.

    Hold on... I know certain folks believe that ANY form of gun control is bad and a **slippery slope** BUT NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT TAKING GUNS AWAY.

    that is AM radio listener conspiracy theory BS!
    This article is erroneous and has no parrallel to current events if current events inspired this post.

    I mean, who are the "Jews" in regards to current events and who are the "nazis"???
    Is Obama the Nazi? I don't get it.

    NO ONE IS TAKIKG ANYONE'S GUNS AWAY!

    Any form of gun legislation should not be seen as such. Stop with the slippery slope logic already!

    And besides where is the (BS) slippery slope "if they legislate on gun regulation it's not lot before they take our guns our right"
    That's not in here.


    So as surprisingly thoughtful and non inflammatory as this author was he did NOT make a connection and this whole thing is quite irrelevant... In my humble opinion.
  • psustud

    Posts: 111

    Jan 07, 2016 5:04 AM GMT
    mickeytopogigio saidAnyway, for some perspective, because Godwin's Law is always a good place to start when making an argument against gun control, here's a graph of homicide (and weapon used) per 100,000 people:

    Graph-1.png



    Where did you get this chart? It's cut off. Id love to see the whole thing?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 5:18 AM GMT
    Hopefully some extra gun control will prevent the rise in stabbings.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 5:19 AM GMT
    interestingchap said
    jock203 saidRead up on Prescott Bush (Busche).


    Presscott Bush was a Nazi and started the CIA of which runs the US and trains the rebel forces to unhinge the middle east, the Nazi ideal is still in force and the bush family are all involved, who do you think was responsible for 911 and the subsequent 1 million + people killed in Iraq who had nothing to do with attacking the US,
    when are people going to wake up and see whats going on right under their noses
    Vote for Trump, he actually gives a shit and cares for people and the country, he isn't perfect but worth the risk.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Intelligence_Agency#History

    "The Central Intelligence Agency was created on 26 July 1947, when Harry S. Truman signed the National Security Act into law. A major impetus for the creation of the CIA was the unforeseen attack on Pearl Harbor. In addition, towards the end of World War II the U.S. government felt the need for a group to coordinate intelligence efforts.

    Immediate predecessors

    The success of the British Commandos during World War II prompted U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt to authorize the creation of an intelligence service modeled after the British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), and Special Operations Executive. This led to the creation of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). On September 20, 1945, shortly after the end of World War II, Harry S. Truman signed an executive order dissolving the OSS, and by October 1945 its functions had been divided between the Departments of State and War. The division lasted only a few months. The first public mention of the "Central Intelligence Agency" appeared on a command-restructuring proposal presented by Jim Forrestal and Arthur Radford to the U.S. Senate Military Affairs Committee at the end of 1945.[43] Despite opposition from the military establishment, the United States Department of State and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),[44] Truman established the National Intelligence Authority[45] in January 1946, which was the direct predecessor of the CIA.[46] Its operational extension was known as the Central Intelligence Group (CIG)[47
    "
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 07, 2016 5:51 AM GMT
    psustud said
    mickeytopogigio saidAnyway, for some perspective, because Godwin's Law is always a good place to start when making an argument against gun control, here's a graph of homicide (and weapon used) per 100,000 people:

    Graph-1.png



    Where did you get this chart? It's cut off. Id love to see the whole thing?


    Right-click on the image, and choose View Image. Tapping on it on your smart phone will expand it too.

    Source: http://www.humanosphere.org/science/2015/10/visualizing-gun-deaths-comparing-u-s-rest-world/