cut or uncut?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2016 10:28 AM GMT
    which one do you prefer? cut or uncut dick?
    and why?

    i prefer cut cause when it is hard the skin don't move in my handicon_wink.gif
  • HottJoe

    Posts: 21366

    Jan 14, 2016 2:36 PM GMT
    I think cut in unnatural and the skin is supposed to "move." You're fetishizing a mutilation.

    I'm cut. I was cut as a baby. I feel the practice of genital mutilation on infants is a violation of basic human rights. If the US were a small poor country, the international community would probably wage a campaign to stop our hospitals from doing it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2016 3:08 PM GMT
    This article is about male circumcision. For female circumcision, see female genital mutilation

    The positions of the world's major medical organizations range from considering neonatal circumcision as having no benefit and significant risks to having a modest health benefit that outweighs small risks. No major medical organization recommends either universal circumcision for all infant males (aside from the recommendations of the World Health Organization for parts of Africa), or banning the procedure.

    An estimated one-third of males worldwide are circumcised. The procedure is most prevalent in the Muslim world and Israel (where it is near-universal as a religious obligation), the United States and parts of Southeast Asia and Africa; it is relatively rare in Europe, Latin America, parts of Southern Africa and most of Asia.[1] The origin of circumcision is not known with certainty; the oldest documentary evidence for it comes from ancient Egypt.[1] Various theories have been proposed as to its origin, including as a religious sacrifice and as a rite of passage marking a boy's entrance into adulthood.[23] It is part of religious law in Judaism and is an established practice in Islam, Coptic Christianity and the Ethiopian Orthodox Church.

    A 2014 review found that the benefits of circumcising an infant outweigh the risks of doing so by at least 100 to 1, and that "over their lifetime, half of uncircumcised males will require treatment for a medical condition associated with retention of the foreskin."[36]

    Sexual effects
    Circumcision does not appear to decrease the sensitivity of the penis, harm sexual function or reduce sexual satisfaction.[20][66] A 2013 systematic review and meta-analysis found that circumcision did not appear to adversely affect sexual desire, pain with intercourse, premature ejaculation, time to ejaculation, erectile dysfunction or difficulties with orgasm.[67] Another 2013 systematic review found that the highest-quality studies reported no adverse effects of circumcision on sexual function, sensitivity, sensation or satisfaction.[21]

    Circumcision is one of the world's most widely performed procedures.[69] Approximately one-third of males worldwide are circumcised, most often for religious or cultural reasons.[1][19][22] It is commonly practiced between infancy and the early twenties.[1] The WHO estimated in 2007 that 664,500,000 males aged 15 and over were circumcised (30–33% global prevalence), almost 70% of whom were Muslim.[1] Circumcision is most prevalent in the Muslim world, Israel, South Korea, the United States and parts of Southeast Asia and Africa.
  • HottJoe

    Posts: 21366

    Jan 14, 2016 3:33 PM GMT
    ^It says circumcision doesn't "appear" to decrease sensitivity. Apparently they didn't bother to interview men. Uncircumcised men describe sensitivity on their glans than cut men just don't experience.

    Overall, the wikipedia post just makes the practice sound barbaric and chilling. The medical benefits of circumcision sound as credible as the medical benefits of using leaches to remove bad humors.icon_confused.gif
  • secondstartot...

    Posts: 1315

    Jan 14, 2016 3:47 PM GMT
    either way does not bother me in the slightest ..Im cut and it never ever bothered me , yes its a tradition in our religion , and even though I am intensely atheist / anti-theist ... still doesn't bother me .. I was 8 days old and honestly I dont remember a thing

    some people here get miffed when I admit to being a bit of a size queen .. like I care ... so as long as the shlong has a hefty girth and an intimidating length and attached to someone of handsome countenance .... and said prick is erected because of my presence ... then curtains or no curtains there will be a show icon_smile.gif

    this is mutilated ?? ok I'll have it


    the skin will move in my hand ? no problem ... Im on my way

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2016 3:57 PM GMT
    I prefer uncut. And when it gets hard and the foreskin moves back it's effectively a cut, too. A convertible! (Brit: droptop)

    But then I've never been fussy, just a preference, not a game-ender. To paraphrase the comic Will Rogers: "I never met a dick I didn't like." icon_biggrin.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2016 4:06 PM GMT
    It's official: Circumcision DOESN'T affect sexual pleasure, according to biggest ever study of the issue

    Being circumcised does not affect a man's sex life, a landmark study has revealed.

    Australian scientists analysed nearly 40 studies and concluded that the procedure had no effect on sensitivity or satisfaction.

    While some studies have previously reported a negative outcome, these were found to have flaws - and their reliability has been called into question by this latest research.

    The most scientifically rigorous studies, however, concluded the circumcision had little, if any, effect.

    Lead author of the study, Professor Brian Morris of the University of Sydney, told MailOnline: 'This is a ground-breaking article.

    'The health benefits of male circumcision have been well documented, including substantially lower risks of HIV and other viral and some bacterial sexually transmitted infections.

    'It also lowers rates of penile cancer and possibly prostate cancer - and women whose partners are circumcised have lower rates of cervical cancer and infections such as HPV and chlamydia.

    'However, there is continued concern that circumcision may reduce male sexual function and pleasure.

    'Yet the highest-quality studies suggest that medical male circumcision has no adverse effect on sexual function, sensitivity, sexual sensation, or satisfaction.'

    He and his co-researcher John Krieger looked at 36 studies totalling 40,473 men - half of were circumcised and half were not. Each of the studies was graded in terms of quality, according to official guidelines.
    Political alignment Conservative
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2016 4:13 PM GMT
    Cut or uncut , i like them both ...mmm...
    I am uncut , and agree about the fact that on uncut dick the head is definitely more sensitive .
    Also , you do not need lube to jerk off , this is money saved !!
  • HottJoe

    Posts: 21366

    Jan 14, 2016 4:28 PM GMT
    neffa saidCur or uncut , i like them both ...mmm...
    I am uncut , and o agree about the fact , uncut men are more sensitive around their penis head , i know i am ..
    Also , you do not need any kind of lotion to jerk off , so you are saving big buck

    To me, it's not about saving a buck, or being indifferent. It's about acknowledging that mutilating babies serves no purpose and it's just sick. I think all men know in their gut that it's wrong, but they delude themselves into justifying it.

    People don't get to legally sacrifice humans in the spirit of religious freedom. I don't think religious freedom should include genital mutilation for babies or children of either sex.

    I don't care of cut men say it doesn't bother them. What choice do they have? It's a defense mechanism because they don't want to ponder the implications of being mutilated as babies.

    It's beyond comprehension that something so sick and twisted could be seen as socially acceptable.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2016 4:50 PM GMT
    Prefer uncut but not a requirement.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2016 7:47 PM GMT
    The moment of truth for size queens: which would matter more, if it's cut or uncut, or if it's 5 inches or 7 inches?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2016 7:55 PM GMT
    I'm uncut and enjoy nothing more than stimulating both the foreskin and the head of the penis. Definitely more sensitive if ur uncut. You have a permanent cover over the head which when pulled back exposes the sensitive head to be stimulated.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 14, 2016 7:56 PM GMT
    I've yet to come across a guy who had a choice in the matter, so it doesn't matter to me.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 15, 2016 1:01 AM GMT
    What is the point of putting hash tags in a forum po-- oh nevermind... :::smh:::

    I prefer cut but i don't mind uncut. I'd bring up the medical advantages of circumcision, but I'd probably unleash a holy war, so I won't.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 15, 2016 1:59 AM GMT
    I prefer uncut because they'll understand how to handle uncut cocks better. When cut guys handle my dick, they are usually very rough because they don't understand that it is too sensitive to the point of painful. icon_sad.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jan 15, 2016 11:00 PM GMT
    I prefer the look of a cut penis
  • koornang

    Posts: 35

    Jan 22, 2016 12:50 AM GMT
    I prefer uncut!
    Natural is best and the skin is there for a reason...

    They look, smell and taste better!

    Can't get enough!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 10, 2016 12:20 AM GMT
    C U T !!!icon_biggrin.gif