Obama will nominate a LGBT for the SCOTUS

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 18, 2016 4:27 PM GMT
    Pamela Karlan maybe
    the legal field is almost totally gay, good choices to be made.

    reference:
    http://www.advocate.com/politics/2016/2/18/could-obama-nominate-lgbt-supreme-court-justice
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 18, 2016 8:48 PM GMT
    Is Scalia 6 feet under yet? He's no doubt spinning, wherever he is, when he heard that.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 18, 2016 10:09 PM GMT
    I think she would be a good pick but she is Jewish?

    We don't need another religious person to replace the dead one. I would rather Obama pick a spiritualist or known atheist,
    Is Ron Reagan jr available?

    icon_idea.gif



  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14295

    Feb 20, 2016 4:02 AM GMT
    pellaz saidPamela Karlan maybe
    the legal field is almost totally gay, good choices to be made.

    reference:
    http://www.advocate.com/politics/2016/2/18/could-obama-nominate-lgbt-supreme-court-justice
    I am very sure that all the narrow minded bible thumping screwballs will go into vapor lock over this oneicon_lol.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 20, 2016 4:34 AM GMT
    b7cabt.jpg
  • oldfart

    Posts: 328

    Feb 20, 2016 5:03 AM GMT
    ^ imploding heads QED
  • mybud

    Posts: 11819

    Feb 20, 2016 5:07 AM GMT
    b7cabt.jpgMy dream come true
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14295

    Feb 20, 2016 11:58 PM GMT
    robbaker saidHomosexuals can be recorded as the most destructive and despicable group ever heard from.

    They cry out for privacy in the bedroom and then publicly announce their sexuality, demand tolerance but deny others the very same virtue, they claim to be nothing more than innocent victims but victimize anyone with a dissenting opinion, claim that they only want equal treatment, but in reality they constantly crave negative attention and demand a celebration of their lifestyle, they wallow in vanity and pride, insist that "tolerance" and "acceptance" are synonymous words, and their claims that the "homosexual" family is on par with the "heterosexual" family is mainly a form of display.

    They are petulant, compulsive, militant, and obsessed with their own sexuality; they make their sexuality their whole personality.icon_rolleyes.gif
    You are a bumbling, brain dead idiot for painting all gay men with a broad brush. Not all gay men and lesbians are the traits that you listed. But you are a self loathing homosexual homophobe who just cannot see the light. You are a lost cause.icon_mad.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 21, 2016 3:53 AM GMT
    roadbikeRob said
    robbaker saidThey are petulant, compulsive, militant, and obsessed with their own sexuality; they make their sexuality their whole personality.icon_rolleyes.gif
    You are a bumbling, brain dead idiot for painting all gay men with a broad brush. Not all gay men and lesbians are the traits that you listed. But you are a self loathing homosexual homophobe who just cannot see the light. You are a lost cause.icon_mad.gif


    He posted the exact same troll quote in a completely different thread.
  • mwolverine

    Posts: 3381

    Feb 21, 2016 6:59 AM GMT
    As qualified as any LGBT candidate may be, this is the wrong time for such a proposal. What is desirable now is a rapid confirmation process, without giving "them" excuses to derail it, let alone rally the religious reich in an election year. (That would be a double loss. The LGBT candidate will not be confirmed and the Republican nominee will appeal to right-wing voters to make sure he is elected lest the Democrats nominate more "perverts" to the highest bench in the land.)

    A well qualified, middle-of-the-road candidate that no one could rightly object to, is the ticekt. If "they" do, now they look like the obstructionists and fools.

    Suffice now with the court shifting from Scalia to a centrist, and advance the opportunity to appoint justices for 4 more years.
  • wild_sky360

    Posts: 1492

    Feb 21, 2016 6:11 PM GMT
    mwolverine saidAs qualified as any LGBT candidate may be, this is the wrong time for such a proposal. What is desirable now is a rapid confirmation process, without giving "them" excuses to derail it, let alone rally the religious reich in an election year. (That would be a double loss. The LGBT candidate will not be confirmed and the Republican nominee will appeal to right-wing voters to make sure he is elected lest the Democrats nominate more "perverts" to the highest bench in the land.)

    A well qualified, middle-of-the-road candidate that no one could rightly object to, is the ticekt. If "they" do, now they look like the obstructionists and fools.

    Suffice now with the court shifting from Scalia to a centrist, and advance the opportunity to appoint justices for 4 more years.

    I said this the day Scalia died.
    Rumors of a moderate woman who is a personal favorite of Judiciary Chair Grassley, who essentially decides if a nominee even gets considered.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 23, 2016 5:42 PM GMT
    "As a result, it is my view that if a Supreme Court justice resigns tomorrow or within the next several weeks, or resigns at the end of the summer, President Bush should consider following the practice of a majority of his predecessors and not — and not — name a nominee until after the November election is completed." - Joe Biden June 25, 1992




  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 24, 2016 8:40 PM GMT
    Sounds like Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval is getting some traction as a potential SCOTUS nominee.