RealJocker's Turn on Caitlyn Jenner

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 18, 2016 1:57 AM GMT
    This is not so much a judgement but an observation. When Bruce Jenner announced he was now to be called Caitlyn Jenner, everyone here acted like he was a God (or Goddess.) The threads were filled with statements like "she's such a hero for what she's done for our community." But since it's come out that she's just as much of a Republican as he was, the tone here is VERY different. And that's putting it nicely. The same members who were worshipping at her size 13 high heels, now come to these threads only to bash her. Is this just more proof of the "Regressive Left" another member was talking about? What are your thoughts? Discuss......
  • craycraydoesd...

    Posts: 596

    Mar 18, 2016 2:14 AM GMT
    So how about that nosejob of yours. Can you clarify which of your past positions do you currently hold about it?

    -Originally said it was because the kids in high school made fun of you and now you regret the cosmetic procedure
    -It was for a deviated septum
    -It never happened

    icon_lol.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 18, 2016 2:18 AM GMT
    ^^^ really… wtf?? icon_rolleyes.gif

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 18, 2016 2:29 AM GMT
    miss-jay.gif?resize=517%2C388
  • ChicagoSteve

    Posts: 1278

    Mar 18, 2016 2:31 AM GMT
    Here is an interesting observation regarding her support of Ted Cruz.


    Though she has tried to position herself as a leader in the trans community, Caitlyn Jenner's support for Ted Cruz shows she remains terrifyingly clueless on the push for transgender rights. This week, the reality TV personality announced she would support Cruz for President in 2016. Let me say that again: Caitlyn Jenner supports virulently transphobic, homophobic Senator Ted Cruz in the 2016 Presidential Election.

    In an interview with The Advocate, Jenner (a long-time Republican) discussed her thoughts on current slate of contenders for the GOP Presidential nominee, saying, "I like Ted Cruz ... I think he’s very conservative and a great constitutionalist and a very articulate man."

    She went on to explain her vision of her involvement in Cruz's potential future administration:

    "And I have all my girls on a trans issues board to advise him on making decisions when it comes to trans issues," she said. "Isn’t that a good idea? ... Trans ambassador to the President of the United States, so we can say, ‘Ted, love what you’re doing but here’s what’s going on.'”

    Of course, Ms. Jenner is no stranger to throwing the rest of the trans community under the bus. In her interview with TIME last year, she disparaged trans women who do not have a cisgender-normative appearance (do not "pass" as cisgender) as looking like "men in dresses." She later apologized for the remark, but only after an enormous uproar from the trans community. She's also made comments implying she does not support gay marriage, and has decried the trans community as engaging in "outrage culture," "political correctness," and lacking a sense of humor.

    How exactly are we supposed to interpret a woman who is the self-appointed face of the trans community (reinforced by the constant media circus that surrounds her) supporting a virulently transphobic candidate from a virulently transphobic party?



  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 18, 2016 2:56 AM GMT
    I never liked her ever since her corseted coming-out pic was revealed. Her talking points are "republicans aren't such bad people" and "19 trillion dollars in debt"... basically she is secretly a democrat and doing a terrible job at playing devil's advocate just for the attention of being "unique" as a trans republican, to keep the "stunning and brave" title alive by "stunning" people in all the wrong ways.
  • sexy_dad_67

    Posts: 111

    Mar 18, 2016 3:05 AM GMT
    hentailover saidI never liked her ever since her corseted coming-out pic was revealed. Her talking points are "republicans aren't such bad people" and "19 trillion dollars in debt"... basically she is secretly a democrat and doing a terrible job at playing devil's advocate just for the attention of being "unique" as a trans republican, to keep the "stunning and brave" title alive by "stunning" people in all the wrong ways.


    You know, that might actually be exactly it...
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 18, 2016 3:15 AM GMT
    Yeah, but should her political views cause everyone to turn on her? Is she a "hero" because she's a tranny or because of her political views?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 18, 2016 3:37 AM GMT
    People are turning on her because she and the rest of that Kartrashian clan are annoying as fuck. It's as simple as that. I'm sick of seeing the last names Kardashian and Jenner on my screen everytime I open the internet. I couldn't give a Willy Wonka Fizzy Lifting Drink flying fuck about Caitlyn's opinions and I'm sick of the media putting them in front of me to try and get me to.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 18, 2016 3:48 AM GMT
    She has got to be well aware, at this very moment, what is going on within our own community. She is part of the movement separation taking place.

    As far as I know, she is on her own, also, with her own political views. Maybe the only good she can do now is to encourage other, closeted, trans republicans, trans conservatives or trans christians to come out.

    I have not heard whether or not the Log Cabins have endorsed her or asked her to represent them. If this ever happens, she would be a true trailblazer for this group of republicans.



    Gay, transgender movements need a divorce: Column
    http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/02/28/gay-rights-trans-rights-south-dakota-bathroom-legislation-column/80710176/

    Log Cabin Republicans
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log_Cabin_Republicans
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 18, 2016 3:55 AM GMT
    ELNathB saidShe has got to be well aware, at this very moment, what is going on within our own community. She is part of the movement separation taking place.


    She does not care what's going on in "her" community. She's a Kardashian and the only thing that matters is the limelight and the money that goes with it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 18, 2016 4:05 AM GMT
    FrankCA said
    ELNathB saidShe has got to be well aware, at this very moment, what is going on within our own community. She is part of the movement separation taking place.


    She does not care what's going on in "her" community. She's a Kardashian and the only thing that matters is the limelight and the money that goes with it.



    Well, her stupid show, that people didn't watch got canceled, other than turning to politics, what does she have left to offer? That family is going to keep her 'in the spotlight' somehow, and those deer in the headlight fans of that will just be stupid enough to keep watching

    Next up.. Dancing With The Stars, now Chaz danced with a women, you think Caitlyn will dance with a man?
  • Wendigo9

    Posts: 426

    Mar 20, 2016 3:31 AM GMT
    Bruce + Kardashian = FREAK Jenner

    Those spoiled brats took his fame as a track star for granted, and sure enough ruined him by making him a women. FREAK Jenner claims "It takes a man to be a better woman" but all I see is a casualty and a sad sad . . . thing. So much for keeping it real, now that's it's completely fake.
  • Ariodante83

    Posts: 152

    Mar 20, 2016 3:36 AM GMT
    It's a Kardashian first and foremost. Burn it!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 20, 2016 4:05 PM GMT




    starting from 1:20 till 6:00
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 20, 2016 4:17 PM GMT
    I think some people are able to compartmentalize. I thought Jenner directed focus (intentionally or not) on the unenviable predicament of transgender people and, in that sense, she served a purpose. On the other hand, her ideas as a transgender and as a private citizen are so beyond comprehension, indeed bordering on hilarity and sheer ignorance, that she deserves to be ostracized by the "regressive left."
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 20, 2016 5:10 PM GMT
    Supporting someone for their sexual identity and then criticizing someone for their stupidity isn't really a U-turn. It shows that people aren't blind believer or follower. They have different instances on different issues. How come being flexible with your opinion about someone is regressive? Another instance which shows how your antics are those of right wings. Right wingers have hard time believing that some people don't blindly follow someone and close their ability of logic and reasoning.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 20, 2016 5:26 PM GMT
    everyone is in it for the money
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 20, 2016 6:05 PM GMT
    Any word on whether Cait is pre or post op tranny?

    Tranny or transvestite?

  • badbug

    Posts: 800

    Mar 21, 2016 1:48 AM GMT
    I never liked her since she killed another human being and then went on to do nothing but talk about herself and her struggles and what SHE represents etc. etc. without really acknowledging that she ended another person's life and that person's family had to deal with the fact that the person responsible for their loved one's misfortune was now being celebrated very publicly as some sort of hero.



    And as far as i understand, regressive left refers to liberals that don't believe in liberal values. Not liking republicans and their idiotic policies has nothing to do with being regressive. Being regressive is supporting multiculturalism over liberty and equality.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 21, 2016 2:35 AM GMT
    My opinion of her hasn't changed. I didn't know much about Bruce and as long as someone can be civil and respectful I don't mind their political beliefs. I'm happy she did what she needed to do to be the person she believes she is and I am happy she came out and transitioned in public. Outside of that I don't have too many opinions on her personal, political or business life.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 22, 2016 3:40 AM GMT
    __morphic__ saidSupporting someone for their sexual identity and then criticizing someone for their stupidity isn't really a U-turn.



    Wrong. The very same people who were calling her a hero are now referring to her as a "him" and calling her Bruce Jenner once again. If someone had done that a couple months ago these same guys would have called you transphobic. If you can't see that you're fucking blind.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 22, 2016 3:46 AM GMT
    I hear she would date a man if he held the door open for her. Now tell me, how many gay men would hold the door open for a man-trans with titties/weiner combo?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 22, 2016 3:51 AM GMT
    badbug said
    Being regressive is supporting multiculturalism over liberty and equality.

    So being for liberty and equality means being for racism? I presume a White supremacy United States?

    Why can't multiculturalism REPRESENT liberty and equality? Well, I guess not in your White supremacist world. At least now I understand who & what you are. icon_razz.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Mar 22, 2016 3:56 AM GMT
    Sam27 saidOh my gosh... Caitlyn Jenner all over again. lol

    Can we all talk about Bruce Jenner now?
    bruce-jenner-linda-thompson-aerobics.gif
    anigif_enhanced-buzz-5872-1366297169-15.



    58759542.jpg