FBI May "Leak" Clinton Email Probe If DOJ Blocking Continues

  • tj85016

    Posts: 4123

    Apr 23, 2016 3:55 PM GMT
    http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/2016/04/22/grassley-fbi-could-leak-clinton-email-investigation/83385362/

    lol, no politics here in protecting this crooked whore
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 23, 2016 9:36 PM GMT
    Big deal. Fox have been claiming for a year now they have people on the inside spilling the beans. These "insiders" have given us gems such as the "147 agents assigned to the investigation" (turns out it was about 12 agents) and "the indictment will be issued within 60 days" (that was 108 days ago).

    No one can rely on any "leaks" about this investigation anymore. In their excitement to try and hang Clinton, the Right have already shot that bolt and no one really gives a crap. With the GOP in civil war and the Dems all but decided on their nominee, Republicans are clutching at straws.

    Why Hillary Clinton is unlikely to be indicted over her private email server

    “There are plenty of unattractive facts but not a lot of clear evidence of criminality, and we tend to forget the distinction,” American University law professor Stephen Vladeck, an expert on prosecutions involving classified information, told me. “This is really just a political firestorm, not a criminal case.”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-hillary-clinton-is-unlikely-to-be-indicted-over-her-private-email-server/2016/03/08/341c3786-e557-11e5-b0fd-073d5930a7b7_story.html
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 23, 2016 10:17 PM GMT
    ^
    "Soundly beaten" according to whom? Socalfitness? - who, let us not forget, has been pedaling the discredited Fox News agenda on this story from day 1.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 23, 2016 11:03 PM GMT
    A Timeline Of The Anonymously Sourced FBI Agent Numbers That Distorted The Clinton Email Server Investigation

    The Numbers Have Changed From 150 To 12

    Since January, numerous outlets, including Fox News and The Washington Post, have cited anonymous or discredited sources to claim that up to 150 FBI agents were investigating Hillary Clinton's private email server. But the number of agents has been a moving target, with the Post later correcting itself to say it was "less than 50" and NBC saying March 30 that the number is closer to 12. NBC's source -- also anonymous -- called the earlier figures "ridiculous" and said, "You need an act of terrorism to get 50 agents working on something."

    On January 11, Fox's chief intelligence correspondent, Catherine Herridge, and senior executive producer Pamela K. Browne reported on FoxNews.com that an anonymous source told them that "about 100 special agents" were assigned to investigate Hillary Clinton's private email server, "with as many as 50 additional agents on 'temporary duty assignment''

    http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/03/31/a-timeline-of-the-anonymously-sourced-fbi-agent/209653



    Fox News Erroneously Insists [as did Socalfitness] It Was Illegal For Hillary Clinton To Discuss NY Times Articles In Emails

    Fox News' chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge hyped claims from an anonymous source that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's personal email "discussed [an] Afghan national's CIA ties" to allege that Clinton violated a 2009 executive order clarifying classification procedures. But Clinton's emails reportedly discussed already published articles by the New York Times, which are not automatically classified under the executive order.

    http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/02/17/fox-news-erroneously-insists-it-was-illegal-for/208658
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 24, 2016 12:48 AM GMT
    socalfitness saidmediamatters is nothing by spin and nonsense and dozens does not equal 12

    using it as sole source = desperation and defeat


    What, as opposed to the Fox News "exclusives" you've been so happy to hang your hat on? The Mediamatters stories are collated from properly cited and quoted news articles, so spare us the waffle.

    (And what part of "There are currently about 12 FBI agents working full-time on the case." didn't you understand?)
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 24, 2016 2:01 AM GMT
    tj85016 saidhttp://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/2016/04/22/grassley-fbi-could-leak-clinton-email-investigation/83385362/

    lol, no politics here in protecting this crooked whore


    The fact remains that any mere mortal would have already been fired and put in jail. If she walks it just shows the justice system is corrupt.



  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14310

    Apr 24, 2016 3:18 AM GMT
    desertmuscl said
    tj85016 saidhttp://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/2016/04/22/grassley-fbi-could-leak-clinton-email-investigation/83385362/

    lol, no politics here in protecting this crooked whore


    The fact remains that any mere mortal would have already been fired and put in jail. If she walks it just shows the justice system is corrupt.



    I think that the Obama Administration is obstructing justice by preventing the DOJ from investigating and indicting this crooked, unqualified bitch.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 24, 2016 8:35 AM GMT
    roadbikeRob said
    I think that the Obama Administration is obstructing justice by preventing the DOJ from investigating and indicting this crooked, unqualified bitch.


    This is the new right-wing (and Hillary-hater) fallback narrative, now that the elusive "Hillary indictment" seems to be legally dead in the water. We can now look forward to another eight and a half years of this from SB/Socal/RBR/tj & Co.
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14310

    Apr 24, 2016 2:37 PM GMT
    Ex_Mil8 said
    roadbikeRob said
    I think that the Obama Administration is obstructing justice by preventing the DOJ from investigating and indicting this crooked, unqualified bitch.


    This is the new right-wing (and Hillary-hater) fallback narrative, now that the elusive "Hillary indictment" seems to be legally dead in the water. We can now look forward to another eight and a half years of this from SB/Socal/RBR/tj & Co.
    You don't know what the hell you are talking about so shut the fuck up.icon_mad.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 25, 2016 1:01 AM GMT
    roadbikeRob said
    Ex_Mil8 said
    roadbikeRob said
    I think that the Obama Administration is obstructing justice by preventing the DOJ from investigating and indicting this crooked, unqualified bitch.


    This is the new right-wing (and Hillary-hater) fallback narrative, now that the elusive "Hillary indictment" seems to be legally dead in the water. We can now look forward to another eight and a half years of this from SB/Socal/RBR/tj & Co.
    You don't know what the hell you are talking about so shut the fuck up.icon_mad.gif


    Some people refuse to see the truth. Anyone with any even a slight acquaintance with classified projects knows ExMil8 is full of shit. But then- he does not even live here.



  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 25, 2016 1:45 AM GMT
    Just a reminder: the FBI is a subordinate bureau within the US Dept of Justice. The Director of the FBI works for the head of the DOJ, who's the US Attorney General.

    So that if the FBI leaks DOJ material pertaining to an ongoing investigation the perpetrators may have committed a prosecutable crime. Of course, that doesn't prevent leaks from happening at any level of government. But I think the Administration would come down on the FBI like a ton of bricks if that kind of departmental disloyalty and internal sabotage occurred.
  • tazzari

    Posts: 2929

    Apr 25, 2016 2:08 AM GMT
    I am no great Hillary fan, but there have been so many "investigations" and "scandals" yakked about by the right, that I no longer listen. Have a look at:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinion/sunday/is-hillary-clinton-dishonest.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14310

    Apr 25, 2016 11:48 AM GMT
    Art_Deco saidJust a reminder: the FBI is a subordinate bureau within the US Dept of Justice. The Director of the FBI works for the head of the DOJ, who's the US Attorney General.

    So that if the FBI leaks DOJ material pertaining to an ongoing investigation the perpetrators may have committed a prosecutable crime. Of course, that doesn't prevent leaks from happening at any level of government. But I think the Administration would come down on the FBI like a ton of bricks if that kind of departmental disloyalty and internal sabotage occurred.
    Probably it is time for the DOJ to start doing its job by investigating this crooked, pathological liar who is totally unqualified and unfit for the White House. The Obama Administration would be very wise to stop obstructing justice and let this investigation proceed without any further delay. It is time for Obama to stop covering up for the Mary Queen of Goldman Sachs.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 25, 2016 4:54 PM GMT
    desertmuscl said
    Some people refuse to see the truth. Anyone with any even a slight acquaintance with classified projects knows ExMil8 is full of shit. But then- he does not even live here.


    I spent an entire career (25 years) working with classified material/info (including NATO classified), so, instead of parroting Southbeach/Socal, why don't you go and find some new material?
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14310

    Apr 26, 2016 3:39 PM GMT
    Ex_Mil8 said
    desertmuscl said
    Some people refuse to see the truth. Anyone with any even a slight acquaintance with classified projects knows ExMil8 is full of shit. But then- he does not even live here.


    I spent an entire career (25 years) working with classified material/info (including NATO classified), so, instead of parroting Southbeach/Socal, why don't you go and find some new material?
    Why don't you accept the true fact that Hillary is totally unqualified and totally unfit to be President of the United Statesicon_question.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 26, 2016 5:11 PM GMT
    roadbikeRob saidWhy don't you accept the true fact that Hillary is totally unqualified and totally unfit to be President of the United Statesicon_question.gif


    Because it's not a true fact, that's why. Why don't you accept that your pathological and misogynistic hatred of the woman has rendered you utterly incapable of making any reasonable assessment of her fitness for office?

    If you want facts (and I'm not sure you'd know a fact if it smacked you in the mouth), Clinton is the only candidate who a majority of your fellow Americans say is qualified to be president.

    Screen-Shot-2016-04-13-at-7.51.50-PM-e14
    Source: YouGov poll of about 2,000 people conducted April 8-11, margin of error ±2.8 percent.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/rampage/wp/2016/04/14/hillary-clinton-is-the-only-candidate-who-a-majority-of-americans-say-is-qualified-to-be-president/