New poll: Trump tops Clinton and view that Hillary never intended to be the Democratic nominee

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 02, 2016 9:58 PM GMT
    Very interesting

    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/justinholcomb/2016/05/02/trump-tops-clinton-in-new-poll-n2156827

    http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/05/clinton_was_never_intended_to_be_the_democrat_nominee.html

    Another good article how the demonstrations help Trump
    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/05/02/make-america-mexico-again-why-american-are-fed-up-with-illegals.html?intcmp=hpbt3
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 02, 2016 10:24 PM GMT
    Yawn. Just another conservarumper posting links to conservative websites.

    What the poll really said:

    Clinton and Trump were tied with 38% support each; 16% said they would vote for some other candidate, and two percent (2%) were undecided.

    But Trump edges slightly ahead if the stay-at-home option is removed.

    Unless someone intends to march "stay-at-homers" to the polls at gunpoint, how are they relevant to the vote count?
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14303

    May 03, 2016 1:52 AM GMT
    Ex_Mil8 saidYawn. Just another conservarumper posting links to conservative websites.

    What the poll really said:

    Clinton and Trump were tied with 38% support each; 16% said they would vote for some other candidate, and two percent (2%) were undecided.

    But Trump edges slightly ahead if the stay-at-home option is removed.

    Unless someone intends to march "stay-at-homers" to the polls at gunpoint, how are they relevant to the vote count?
    Why don't you get out of your ultra leftist fantasyland. Hillary is going to get crushed by Trump in November.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 03, 2016 1:54 AM GMT
    Ex_Mil8 saidYawn. Just another conservarumper posting links to conservative websites.

    What the poll really said:

    Clinton and Trump were tied with 38% support each; 16% said they would vote for some other candidate, and two percent (2%) were undecided.

    But Trump edges slightly ahead if the stay-at-home option is removed.

    Unless someone intends to march "stay-at-homers" to the polls at gunpoint, how are they relevant to the vote count?


    Your opinion here only matters if you can vote. Otherwise, just more bla bla.....
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 03, 2016 3:29 PM GMT
    roadbikeRob said
    Ex_Mil8 saidYawn. Just another conservarumper posting links to conservative websites.

    What the poll really said:

    Clinton and Trump were tied with 38% support each; 16% said they would vote for some other candidate, and two percent (2%) were undecided.

    But Trump edges slightly ahead if the stay-at-home option is removed.

    Unless someone intends to march "stay-at-homers" to the polls at gunpoint, how are they relevant to the vote count?
    Why don't you get out of your ultra leftist fantasyland. Hillary is going to get crushed by Trump in November.


    Trump will not play nice. He will haul out all of Hillary's dirty laundry for the world to see.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 03, 2016 5:10 PM GMT
    desertmuscl said
    Trump will not play nice. He will haul out all of Hillary's dirty laundry for the world to see.


    And you don't think she's going to do the same to him? Moreover, she will leave him standing when it comes to his specific policies, such as his weird stance on China. He says he's going to "get tough" with China on trade, (which, by the way, most experts agree is more likely to deepen America’s economic pains, particularly if China retaliates), while basically handing over the South China Sea to China, by withdrawing US military influence in that area. In other words, he'll make America weak, again.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 04, 2016 12:27 PM GMT
    Clinton has more balls than 16 of Trump's presidential opponents combined. If you think that Clinton is the "wicked witch of the west" (which may well be true), then multiply that 100x when she starts really focusing on Trump. Don't forget that this woman was involved in 2 presidential impeachment proceedings (Nixon and Clinton). Trump deserves a calculating, scorched-earth MOFO of an opponent with monster balls, and he's getting one. This election is going to be fun!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    May 05, 2016 6:00 PM GMT
    DOMINUS saidClinton has more balls than 16 of Trump's presidential opponents combined. If you think that Clinton is the "wicked witch of the west" (which may well be true), then multiply that 100x when she starts really focusing on Trump. Don't forget that this woman was involved in 2 presidential impeachment proceedings (Nixon and Clinton). Trump deserves a calculating, scorched-earth MOFO of an opponent with monster balls, and he's getting one. This election is going to be fun!

    Nonsense, but nice to hear wisdom from a 98 year old. icon_lol.gif