Razvigor saidSome people need to be screened for psychological instability prior to becoming sexually active.
I'm not surprised, I've known about this as long as I have been interested in sex. I just haven't had an opportunity to discuss how I feel about it openly.
Considering the damage HIV has done globally, to engage in something like this you are by no way, shape, or form, a normal functioning human being. No matter what you tell yourself.
Too much sanctimonious BS. If one is Negative and on PrEP and the other is POZ and undetectable there is virtually no chance of HIV transmission. If you think the "virtually" part is too risky then consider a monastery...or a lesbian convent.
There has been 1 reported case of HIV while on PrEP (among 10s of thounsands of sexual acts) , 0 on ART while clinically undetectable, even without PrEP partners.
Just to be clear, I would NEVER EVER have sex with someone who is as illinformed as you. I've met bug chasers who were smarter.
Considering you meet with people you know are "bug chasers" I'm not surprised of this sad relativization of the situation on your part. I don't think you fall any further from that bug chaser tree either, otherwise why jump to attack me?
Ill-informed? I think if people like the ones we talk about were "better-informed", HIV wouldn't have gone as far within the gay community as it did. So save your justificatory bullshit for your 5 minute brainstorm before bedtime. I'm not the one in need of convincing, you are.
Believe me, on the part of having sex, that feeling is extremely mutual. I prefer sane people.
I met a bug chaser online. He had contacted ME because I am POZ, but was too stupid to know what Undetectable was. He, like you, are unaware of what UDVL is apparently.
You said "Some people need to be screened for psychological instability prior to becoming sexually active." Then "to engage in something like this you are by no way, shape, or form, a normal functioning human being." I'm not sure what "like this" is. If you mean the phony article where a HIV+ man is "secretly" invited to a sex party to possibly infect others....it is pernicious. The tacit implication is the HIV is the boogie man, trying to secretly infect people like us.
But I am not us anymore, by your estimation. I am "them" by your divisive narrative. All HIV people should be "screened" for instability? We are thus no longer "human"?...that's some scary rhetoric. Especially in this age of TasP where the people who are POZ and undetectable are eliminating
It's called "GETTING TO ZERO", maybe you've heard about it?
"2. There is wide scientific consensus that immediate use of HAART following HIV infection prevents disease progression to AIDS and premature death and, secondarily, (TasP) virtually abolishes the chances of forward transmission of the virus;" http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/dr-julio-montaner/world-aids-day_b_8594620.html
Maybe you disdain sex parties. I don't go to them. But as far as I know it's not illegal. the Playboy Club has been doing them for decades. And quite frankly the idea of "screening" Gays for mental deficiency is a dangerous proposal, Negative OR Positive. 60 years ago we all would have been locked up.