Putin's Puppet: If the Russian president could design a candidate to undermine American interests—and advance his own—he’d look a lot like Donald Trump

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 24, 2016 3:04 PM GMT
    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/07/vladimir_putin_has_a_plan_for_destroying_the_west_and_it_looks_a_lot_like.htmlDonald Trump told the New York Times that he would not necessarily come to the aid of NATO states threatened by Russia and would make his decision to defend them from an attack after reviewing whether they “have fulfilled their obligations to us.” It was the latest statement from Trump that was likely greeted with delight in the Kremlin.
    160705_POL_Putin-Trump-Promo.jpg.CROP.pr
    Vladimir Putin has a plan for destroying the West—and that plan looks a lot like Donald Trump. Over the past decade, Russia has boosted right-wing populists across Europe. It loaned money to Marine Le Pen in France, well-documented transfusions of cash to keep her presidential campaign alive. Such largesse also wended its way to the former Italian premier Silvio Berlusconi, who profited “personally and handsomely” from Russian energy deals...

    There’s a clear pattern: Putin runs stealth efforts on behalf of politicians who rail against the European Union and want to push away from NATO...

    WB339-2.jpg?1348488737
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 25, 2016 3:24 AM GMT
    Liberals Hypocrites, your own left wing rag already exposed the corrupt Clinton Putin Uranium Deal in exchange for cash to the Clintons:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

    JPURANIUM4-master675-v2.jpg
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 25, 2016 5:21 AM GMT
    mx5guynj saidLiberals Hypocrites, your own left wing rag already exposed the corrupt Clinton Putin Uranium Deal in exchange for cash to the Clintons:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

    JPURANIUM4-master675-v2.jpg


    What about NATO?
  • Unnamed6

    Posts: 1144

    Jul 25, 2016 6:26 AM GMT
    I have much worse evidence than what has been cited in the Slate article and had been saying such for months to anyone that gave me an ear (and only indicated such at times on RJ) but the air in my area is so bad that I couldn't write a report in time to present to federal authorities or even the powers that be in the RNC to prevent Donald Trumps nomination at the convention (and still apparently need to write that report, or at least something to present the evidence).
  • Unnamed6

    Posts: 1144

    Jul 25, 2016 6:29 AM GMT
    And my evidence is far more damning to Trump than in the Slate article, because like I said, I am able to link him to ISIS (if elements of ISIS can be considered Russian operations, like it's recruitment efforts online, hacking division, and spam which is exactly similar to the Trump operation by the Russians).
  • Unnamed6

    Posts: 1144

    Jul 25, 2016 6:48 AM GMT
    God damn it! Slate beat me in informing the general public, but also the political and moneyed elite of our country that Russia is influencing our election. If only I presented my Russian/Trump/ISIS evidence far sooner to the powers that be, as I knew about such for more than half a year now, yours truly could have held considerable sway over billionaires and the political elite. Now an opportunity of power over such people is diminished by my horrible timing (and I still haven't even shown any evidence on RJ). But I still have information...and I could still very much leverage that information over such people. I can't help that I live in what I suspect to be the most polluted area in the country because of the expansion of the Freeway 5, but something called a snake plant and an ionizer is miraculously alleviating my inability to do work or even post on RJ!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 25, 2016 1:31 PM GMT
    TIMinPS said
    mx5guynj saidLiberals Hypocrites, your own left wing rag already exposed the corrupt Clinton Putin Uranium Deal in exchange for cash to the Clintons:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0


    What about NATO?


    Oh I see you quoted the meme freak so I'll comment towards that.

    Even the cited article notes that:

    no one “has ever produced a shred of evidence supporting the theory that Hillary Clinton ever took action as secretary of state to support the interests of donors to the Clinton Foundation.” He emphasized that multiple United States agencies, as well as the Canadian government, had signed off on the deal and that, in general, such matters were handled at a level below the secretary.


    Never mind that even if there was quid pro quo involving the Clintons, not even so much with regard to their charity foundation which independent charity watchers show to give more to charity than the industry average, but rather just that Bill couldn't have easily gotten his speaking fees elsewhere because we all know how rock stars are limited in their engagements, even if all that, it still doesn't rise to the level of Russia manipulating an American election.

    And not that I'd necessarily believe Trump actively involved with Putin without someone showing some pretty good proof--though I may by chance joke about that--but even if not, he absolutely plays into that even if just independently, not unlike how Clinton's foundation might have benefited independent of their non-charity international work, be that personal or state which all function at that international level.

    The NATO of Trump does seem telling. And this is not just a Democratic response. This is no joke. This is serious shit.

    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-bipartisan-condemnation-nato-comments/story?id=40774526Donald Trump Gets Bipartisan Condemnation for NATO Comments

    Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump drew swift rebukes from both ends of the political spectrum, as well as from NATO’s top official, for his declaration that, if he is president, the United States will defend fellow NATO countries only if the countries in question were contributing their fair share to NATO’s budget.

    Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called Trump's comments a "rookie mistake."


    Rookie for president? YIKES!

    Yeah, we get freshman in Congress. But in the presidency? Really? This is acceptable? No.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 25, 2016 1:46 PM GMT
    If megalomaniac Putin had a twin he would look exactly like Trump. Are we sure that Trump was actually born in the US as opposed to the former USSR? To be sure, at least a couple of his principal campaigners (e.g., Manafort, who has lost all credibility in light of the Melania plagiarism saga) had direct business (and most likely, personal) ties with Putin and the Russian government.