Gold Star father exposed as having multiple links to the Clintons - used son's sacrifice for his own ends. Multiple sources, supports Sharia law, Clinton supporters hysterical.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 06, 2016 7:00 PM GMT
    kizar-khan-get-off-the-bs.jpg

    "...involved with a multitude of financial, legal, and political connections to the Clinton’s criminal Foundation through his old law firm, the mega-D.C. firm Hogan Lovells LLP."

    http://getoffthebs.com/payoff-khan/

    Clinton Cash: Khizr Khan’s Deep Legal, Financial Connections to Saudi Arabia, Hillary’s Clinton Foundation Tie Terror, Immigration, Email Scandals Together

    http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/01/clinton-cash-khizr-khans-deep-legal-financial-connections-saudi-arabia-hillarys-clinton-foundation-connect-terror-immigration-email-scandals/




  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 06, 2016 7:29 PM GMT
    Speaking of busted, you still haven't told us whose picture you stole.

    11.jpg
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 06, 2016 7:40 PM GMT
    bayguy said
    kizar-khan-get-off-the-bs.jpg

    "...involved with a multitude of financial, legal, and political connections to the Clinton’s criminal Foundation through his old law firm, the mega-D.C. firm Hogan Lovells LLP."

    http://getoffthebs.com/payoff-khan/

    Clinton Cash: Khizr Khan’s Deep Legal, Financial Connections to Saudi Arabia, Hillary’s Clinton Foundation Tie Terror, Immigration, Email Scandals Together

    http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/01/clinton-cash-khizr-khans-deep-legal-financial-connections-saudi-arabia-hillarys-clinton-foundation-connect-terror-immigration-email-scandals/


    After the insults come the smears. Nice. Trump has deep business ties with the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia. Given his anti-Muslim stance, he's the only hypocrite in this story.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 06, 2016 7:54 PM GMT
    http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/02/khizr-khan-deletes-law-firm-website-proving-financially-benefits-pay-play-muslim-migration/

    Khizr Khan, the Muslim Gold Star father that Democrats and their allies media wide have been using to hammer GOP presidential nominee Donald J. Trump, has deleted his law firm’s website from the Internet.

    This development is significant, as his website proved—as Breitbart News and others have reported—that he financially benefits from unfettered pay-to-play Muslim migration into America.

    A snapshot of his now deleted website, as captured by the Wayback Machine which takes snapshots archiving various websites on the Internet, shows that as a lawyer he engages in procurement of EB5 immigration visas and other “Related Immigration Services.”
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 06, 2016 8:15 PM GMT
    More unsubstantiated smear tactics.

    Khan's homepage says nothing about Saudi Arabia, merely that one of his Areas of Practice is "E2 Treaty Investors, EB5 Investments & Related Immigration Services"

    https://web.archive.org/web/20160802121411/http://www.kmkhanlaw.com/



    Saudi Arabia isn't an E-2 Treaty country:

    https://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/fees/treaty.html



    Saudi Arabia evidently isn't a user of the EB-5 Visa scheme, nor it appears is any other predominantly Muslim country. Out of 10,000 EB-5 visa recipients, 9128 were Chinese and the rest were from South Korea, Mexico, Vietnam and India.

    http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/09/should-congress-let-wealthy-foreigners-buy-citizenship/406432/



    So, where's the Saudi or "pay-to-play Muslim migration" connection?


  • tazzari

    Posts: 2937

    Aug 06, 2016 10:37 PM GMT
    "...involved with a multitude of financial, legal, and political connections to the Clinton’s criminal Foundation through his old law firm, the mega-D.C. firm Hogan Lovells LLP."

    Which makes his message untrue, how?

    Maybe someone can inform us what the "criminal" foundation has been found guilty of?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 06, 2016 11:11 PM GMT
    tazzari said"...involved with a multitude of financial, legal, and political connections to the Clinton’s criminal Foundation through his old law firm, the mega-D.C. firm Hogan Lovells LLP."

    Which makes his message untrue, how?

    Maybe someone can inform us what the "criminal" foundation has been found guilty of?

    It shows he was a paid operative and has a financial interest in Muslim immigration. He also demonstrated ignorance of the Constitution by suggesting it prohibits religion as an immigration factor - hint: read first Amendment. So that makes his message untrue.

    Much evidence of quid pro quo regarding Clinton Foundation and Hillary - but the DOJ will not prosecute with this corrupt administration. But in the court of public opinion to most not on the far left, the Foundation is a criminal entity and H is a criminal
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 07, 2016 12:15 AM GMT
    Since Trump has absolutely nothing to do with his son's death. This was nothing less than a set up to bastardise Trump. Hillary belongs in prison, not the White House.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 07, 2016 12:21 AM GMT
    Ex_Mil8 said
    Speaking of busted, you still haven't told us whose picture you stole.

    11.jpg

    busted_zpseek4frq3.jpg
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 07, 2016 12:40 AM GMT
    BTW, the sources for this "exposé" are a radical Right Wing gun nuts site, and Breitbart. You remember Breitbart - they carried the phony story about ACORN that Republicans used as an excuse to unfund it. And the other site carries such gems as the Washington Post bugging Donald Trump's executive offices.

    So I think this story about the Khans can also be easily dismissed as fabrication. I wondered how long it would take Republicans to go into personal attack mode on this family. Proving they're no better than their current standard bearer, Trump.

    And also demonstrating that the obsessed Clinton-hating RJ members who post this unsupportable garbage have no currency, either.
  • tazzari

    Posts: 2937

    Aug 07, 2016 1:19 AM GMT
    Art_Deco saidBTW, the sources for this "exposé" are a radical Right Wing gun nuts site, and Breitbart. You remember Breitbart - they carried the phony story about ACORN that Republicans used as an excuse to unfund it. And the other site carries such gems as the Washington Post bugging Donald Trump's executive offices.

    So I think this story about the Khans can also be easily dismissed as fabrication. I wondered how long it would take Republicans to go into personal attack mode on this family. Proving they're no better than their current standard bearer, Trump.

    And also demonstrating that the obsessed Clinton-hating RJ members who post this unsupportable garbage have no currency, either.


    ^ This. Thanks, Art!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 07, 2016 1:27 AM GMT
    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/08/is_there_a_backstory_about_khizr_khan_and_donald_trump.html

    According to Theodore Shoebat and Walid Shoebat, Mr. Khizr Muazzam Khan is a promoter of Islamic sharia law and a co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (sharia).
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 07, 2016 1:47 AM GMT
    Art_Deco saidBTW, the sources for this "exposé" are a radical Right Wing gun nuts site, and Breitbart. ...

    BTW - any site is considered by the far left as a radical right wing "gun" haha lol site if it does not spout the left party line. Organizations and sites that take direction from the White House (laughed about manipulating the press) and/or DNC and/or Clinton campaign are normal to these people. Includes:

    ABC
    NBC / MSNBC
    CBS
    CNN
    NY Times
    Washington Post - some occasions they split to show some independence like Hillary 4 Pinocchios for lying about FBI saying she didn't lie to public
    Daily Kos
    Thinkprogress
    Mother Jones
    Slate
    Salon
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 07, 2016 3:12 AM GMT
    Art_Deco said
    Ex_Mil8 said
    Speaking of busted, you still haven't told us whose picture you stole.

    11.jpg

    busted_zpseek4frq3.jpg


    Hillary belongs in prison, not the White House.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 07, 2016 3:13 AM GMT
    Anyone who votes for Hillary, loves America as much as OJ loved Nicole.
  • tazzari

    Posts: 2937

    Aug 07, 2016 4:20 AM GMT
    BTW - B ut any site is considered by the far right as a radical "lib" "gun" haha lol site if it does not spout the right party line.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 07, 2016 4:45 AM GMT
    tazzari saidBTW - B ut any site is considered by the far right as a radical "lib" "gun" haha lol site if it does not spout the right party line.

    Many of the non-left leaning sites have been critical of Trump at times. Have the left sites been critical of Hillary? Have they called out her obvious lies about handling of classified material? Or are they and her supporters a bunch of ignorant, mindless followers?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 07, 2016 7:19 AM GMT
    bayguy said
    tazzari saidBTW - B ut any site is considered by the far right as a radical "lib" "gun" haha lol site if it does not spout the right party line.

    Many of the non-left leaning sites have been critical of Trump at times. Have the left sites been critical of Hillary? Have they called out her obvious lies about handling of classified material? Or are they and her supporters a bunch of ignorant, mindless followers?


    Many of the leftards don't like the truth, so they see it as hate.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 08, 2016 1:15 AM GMT
    Aunty_Jack said
    bayguy said
    tazzari saidBTW - B ut any site is considered by the far right as a radical "lib" "gun" haha lol site if it does not spout the right party line.

    Many of the non-left leaning sites have been critical of Trump at times. Have the left sites been critical of Hillary? Have they called out her obvious lies about handling of classified material? Or are they and her supporters a bunch of ignorant, mindless followers?


    Many of the leftards don't like the truth, so they see it as hate.

    Very true.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 08, 2016 1:27 AM GMT
    bayguy said
    Aunty_Jack said
    Many of the leftards don't like the truth, so they see it as hate.

    Very true.


    lol - Says the guy who has been pedalling lies in this very thread.

    Khizr Khan's 'Deep Legal and Financial Connections' to Hillary Clinton

    The first and and most glaringly obvious problem with this narrative is that Khizr Khan didn't ever work for the Hogan Lovells law firm. He was employed for seven years (from 2000-07) at the Washington, D.C., office of Hogan & Hartson, a U.S.-based firm that — three years after Khan left their employ — merged with the London-based international law firm Lovells to form Hogan Lovells in 2010. And Lovells (where Khan never worked) had an office in the Saudi Arabian capital of Riyadh.

    So according to Breitbart, Khizr Khan's "deep legal connection" to the Saudi government is that he was once employed by a law firm that, years after he stopped working there, merged to create a new law firm that is now doing work on behalf of the Saudi government. Completely missing from this narrative is any actual evidence that Khizr Khan himself was ever involved in performing any legal work on behalf of the Saudi government.


    http://www.snopes.com/2016/08/03/khizr-khans-connections/
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 08, 2016 2:08 AM GMT
    bayguy said
    Aunty_Jack said
    bayguy said
    tazzari saidBTW - B ut any site is considered by the far right as a radical "lib" "gun" haha lol site if it does not spout the right party line.

    Many of the non-left leaning sites have been critical of Trump at times. Have the left sites been critical of Hillary? Have they called out her obvious lies about handling of classified material? Or are they and her supporters a bunch of ignorant, mindless followers?


    Many of the leftards don't like the truth, so they see it as hate.

    Very true.


    And because failed socialist Obama broke the bank, helped ISIS => Trump/Pence 2016 => no EBT cards for RJ libtards.

    c3490930ac78df155ee277a6212757bb.jpg