Hillary's Health Problem Part III: More Evidence (7 min. video, Fast Forward to 4 mins. 45 seconds and watch until the end)

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 20, 2016 4:18 PM GMT

  • rnch

    Posts: 11524

    Aug 20, 2016 4:22 PM GMT
    Stuff And Nonsense.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 20, 2016 4:40 PM GMT
    It is sad and saddening to see Hillary needing to be rescued.
    It is heart wrenching to see her in need and the handler and the Secret Service rush to the stage and the Handler tells her to "keep talking," then she repeats, "We'll keep talking."
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 20, 2016 5:53 PM GMT
    StephenOABC said


    You know that's all been debunked, right? Coughing fits that go back to 2008? The speaker is an anarchist, get rid of taxes?

    Only a crazy conspiracy theorist believes in this crap, especially after it's been proven to be false. That Trump supports believe (he is a huge conspiracy fan) puts you all in THAT fucked up camp.
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14345

    Aug 20, 2016 8:15 PM GMT
    TIMinPS said
    StephenOABC said


    You know that's all been debunked, right? Coughing fits that go back to 2008? The speaker is an anarchist, get rid of taxes?

    Only a crazy conspiracy theorist believes in this crap, especially after it's been proven to be false. That Trump supports believe (he is a huge conspiracy fan) puts you all in THAT fucked up camp.
    Bullshit, that has not been debunked. That was just the corporate mainstream media lying and covering up for the Wicked Witch of Wall Street.
  • badbug

    Posts: 800

    Aug 20, 2016 8:45 PM GMT

    Oh no Hillary might not be healthy, so lets vote for Trump. If Hillary gets sick and dies, we'll be glad we voted for a guy who knows shockingly little about anything and has the temperament of a 12 year old bi-polar girl who hasn't eaten nothing but sugary sodas for a week.



  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 21, 2016 4:05 AM GMT
    TIMinPS said
    StephenOABC said


    You know that's all been debunked, right? Coughing fits that go back to 2008? The speaker is an anarchist, get rid of taxes?

    Only a crazy conspiracy theorist believes in this crap, especially after it's been proven to be false. That Trump supports believe (he is a huge conspiracy fan) puts you all in THAT fucked up camp.


    TIM in PS, go ahead and debunk it. Tell us when she froze and the CIA and her Handler rushed to her aid.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 21, 2016 4:13 AM GMT
    Tim in PS,

    The video clip where she freezes has the current 2016 campaign slogan, "Stronger Together."
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 21, 2016 4:25 AM GMT
    Tim in PS,

    Her brain short-circuits are 2016 news. See:

    http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/photo-hillary-physically-propped-up-during-campaign-speech/


    She was a Goldwater Girl and more in this video:

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 21, 2016 4:29 AM GMT
    The above video, Tim, is indefensible.

    I'm up to 16: 43 on this video.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 21, 2016 9:18 AM GMT
    rnch saidStuff And Nonsense.


    She could be in a coma, yet many of you guys, still would not admit something is wrong.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 21, 2016 1:36 PM GMT
    We need not wonder why at the RNC, people where chanting "Lock Her Up" given the video above and the video below.

  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 14345

    Aug 21, 2016 2:48 PM GMT
    StephenOABC saidWe need not wonder why at the RNC, people where chanting "Lock Her Up" given the video above and the video below.

    Yet the corporate mainstream media will never show these factual videos because it will obviously do irreparable damage to the candidate that they want in the White House, the hapless Hillary ho.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 21, 2016 7:21 PM GMT
    That was brilliant, but not for what you imagine.

    First the collapse of building 7 on 9-11 is yet another looney tunes conspiracy. It's use in the video does nothing to undermine the FBI or Clinton. No more than the inclusion of the movie clip where "this shit gets real".

    Colin Powell used AOL!!!!!!!!!!! I respect him and his decision to use more advanced e-mail than what the State Department had, everyone agrees it was antiquated. He had NOTHING to turn over. Not a single e-mail. His was a commercial account, hers was a private server. I KNOW my account on AOL was hacked.

    Someone needs to prove hers was more vulnerable. To date not one of her e-mails has proven to be hacked or used in secret. Both agreed the State Department's e-mail was less than adequate.

    The Republicans have a kernel of truth, but there is a whole ear of corn they are oblivious to. The Republicans need to be careful. If they try to undermine the FBI any further they will be seen as what they are: fools who politicize everything.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 21, 2016 7:48 PM GMT
    It got 4 PINOCHIOS and totally refuted on snopes.com.

    Get over it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 22, 2016 12:46 PM GMT
    TIMinPS said
    First the collapse of building 7 on 9-11 is yet another looney tunes conspiracy.


    Your reasoning and conclusion are erroneous. Further communication with you is unnecessary.


    "Pulling" Building 7

    A PBS documentary about the 9/11/01 attack, America Rebuilds, features an interview with the leaseholder of the destroyed WTC complex, Larry Silverstein. In it, the elderly developer makes the following statement:
    I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.

    This statement seems to suggest that the FDNY decided to demolish the building in accordance with Silverstein's suggestion, since the phrase "pull it" in this context seems to mean to demolish the building. At least that interpretation appears to be supported by a statement by a Ground Zero worker in the same documentary:
    ... we're getting ready to pull the building six.

    Building 6 was one of the badly damaged low-rise buildings in the WTC complex that had to be demolished as part of the cleanup operation.

    An alternative interpretation of Silverstein's statement is that "pull it" refers to withdrawing firefighters from the building. However, according to FEMA's report there were no manual firefighting operations in Building 7, so there would not have been any firefighters to "pull" -- at least not from inside the building.
    WTC 7 collapsed approximately 7 hours after the collapse of WTC 1. Preliminary indications were that, due to lack of water, no manual firefighting actions were taken by FDNY.

    That Silverstein would admit that officials intentionally demolished Building 7 is bizarre for a number of reasons. Silverstein Properties Inc. had already won an $861 million claim for the loss of the building in a terrorist incident. FEMA's report states that the cause of the building's collapse was fires. Presumably FEMA and the insurance company would be interested in knowing if the building was instead demolished by the FDNY. Moreover, the logistics of rigging a skyscraper for demolition in the space of a few hours would be daunting to say the least, particularly given that demolition teams would have to work around fires and smoke.
    An Overlooked Explanation

    A third explanation is less obvious but makes sense of the non-sequiturs in the above explanations: perhaps Silverstein's statement was calculated to confuse the issue of what actually happened to Building 7. By suggesting that it was demolished by the FDNY as a safety measure, it provides an alternative to the only logical explanation -- that it was rigged for demolition before the attack. The absurdity of the FDNY implementing a plan to "pull" Building 7 on the afternoon of 9/11/01 will escape most people, who neither grasp the technical complexity of engineering the controlled demolition of a skyscraper, nor its contradiction with FEMA's account of the collapse, nor the thorough illegality of such an operation. Thus the idea that officials decided to "pull" Building 7 after the attack serves as a distraction from the inescapable logic that the building's demolition was planned in advance of the attack, and was therefore part of an inside job to destroy the entire WTC complex.

    Web research supports the theory that Silverstein's remark was part of a calculated distraction. The pull-it remark is copied by hundreds of websites, many citing the remark from the Ground Zero worker about Building 6 as proof that to 'pull' means to demolish. However, searching sites specific to the demolition trade does not support this meaning of 'pull'. The following Google searches of the two best known controlled demolition sites in October of 2003 did not return any results indicating that pulling and demolition are synonymous.

    site:controlled-demolition.com pull
    site:implosionworld.com pull

    Searching Google with the query demolition pull and filtering out sites referring to the Silverstein pull-it remark returns only one result in about 10 pages of results that uses 'pull' to mean demolish:

    City staff have contacted the property owner by phone to request that he obtain a demolition permit and pull down and demolish the building

    A review of the numerous websites that assert that Silverstein's remark constituted an admission of demolishing WTC 7 is revealing. Few such sites note that the physical characteristics of the collapse exactly match conventional demolitions, or that fires have never before or since felled steel-framed high-rise buildings -- two facts that constitute an overwhelming case for the controlled demolition of WTC 7. Instead, the pull-it controversy seems to have created a distraction, eclipsing the case for controlled demolition.
    http://www.wtc7.net/pullit.html
    = = =
    90-95% of Clinton's emails were on the State's server as Hillary reasons: "I sent emails to .gov" while Colin Powell admits his correspondence was not only internal emails. Hillary's email correspondence in her former job would have been 90-95% internal / 5-10% external?

    Third, It is more efficient to go to a user account and collect the sent emails than to search all employees at .gov for emails sent by Hillary.
    90-95% of Clinton's emails were on the State's server? How many countries were touched by her role? How does the State department pull those external emails?

    Having no documentation of external correspondence (and no classified government record/declassified/non-classified public record of external correspondence) is a problem.

    Addendum to the above reply:

    The Washington Post had this article:
    Fact Checker
    Hillary Clinton’s claim that 90 percent of her emails were ‘in the system’

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/11/09/hillary-clintons-claim-that-90-percent-of-her-emails-were-in-the-system/

    The Pinocchio Test

    Clinton clearly erred in saying that the “90 to 95 percent” figure was from the State Department. This is her own staff’s calculation, and she should correct the record.

    While not all of the e-mails she submitted to the State Department have been released, what has been made available so far suggests that a substantial majority are to and from at least one “state.gov” e-mail address. It is not an unreasonable assumption that these e-mails are contained somewhere within the bowels of the State Department. But Clinton cannot make a definitive statement and certainly cannot attribute that to the State Department.

    In the interest of precision, Clinton would do better to say that “my staff has calculated that 90 percent were sent to or from a state.gov e-mail address” rather than “90 percent were already in the system.”

    Three Pinocchios





  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 22, 2016 12:54 PM GMT
    https://careers.state.gov/learn/what-we-do

    What We Do
    Diplomacy: The U.S. Department of State@Work

    As the lead U.S. foreign affairs agency, the U.S. Department of State represents the United States at more than 270 diplomatic locations around the world, including embassies, consulates, and missions to international organizations.

    = = =
    Hillary would have had external contact with at least twenty-seven top tier international entities.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 22, 2016 12:58 PM GMT
    ISOO will communicate the results once all agencies have completed their reviews or after one year’s time, whichever comes first. If an institution is not satisfied with the results of an agency’s review, it may appeal the agency’s initial determination. If an agency or agencies fail to review the records within a year, ISOO will notify the requesting institution of its right to appeal directly to the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel for a final determination on the records’ classification status.
    Contacting the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO)


    But Hillary is removing classified headers, creating "non-papers" and emailing them.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 23, 2016 8:58 PM GMT
    StephenOABC saidISOO will communicate the results once all agencies have completed their reviews or after one year’s time, whichever comes first. If an institution is not satisfied with the results of an agency’s review, it may appeal the agency’s initial determination. If an agency or agencies fail to review the records within a year, ISOO will notify the requesting institution of its right to appeal directly to the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel for a final determination on the records’ classification status.
    Contacting the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO)


    But Hillary is removing classified headers, creating "non-papers" and emailing them.


    And removing the classified information from within the e-mail. You forgot that part. The FBI said that.

    BTW did you watch Kimmel? Clinton is doing just fine.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 23, 2016 9:17 PM GMT
    The video below is more interesting. Watch what's going to happen on the Trump fake medical letter issue in the next several days. Hold on tight, it's going to be a bumpy ride.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 12, 2016 1:12 AM GMT
    http://legalinsurrection.com/2016/09/clinton-collapse-hillary-rushed-away-from-9-11-ceremony/

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 12, 2016 1:32 AM GMT
    StephenOABC saidhttp://legalinsurrection.com/2016/09/clinton-collapse-hillary-rushed-away-from-9-11-ceremony/



    This is more than just garden variety pneumonia.

    I'd say it's some type of neurological condition. The pneumonia is a secondary, which can often be fatal.