A few links to sources if some want some balance

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 10, 2016 9:05 PM GMT
    The following links are not always pro-Trump. Some include critical articles. But for those who want a balance to the stuff posted here, check them out. Do your own research and form your own conclusions.

    There is no need to engage in arguments with the few hard-core anti-Trump zealots here. One is insane. One is delusional and immature for a 60+ year old. One's personality disorder is characterized by an obsessive/compulsive disorder. One has a personality disorder characterized by an inferiority complex and low self-esteem. Ignore them and go to other sources, not just their parroting from extreme left sites or biased mainstream sources.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/

    http://dailycaller.com/

    http://spectator.org/

    http://www.drudgereport.com/

    http://www.breitbart.com/

    http://www.foxnews.com/
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 10, 2016 9:43 PM GMT
    I'm sure people will form their own conclusions as to the character, maturity and self-esteem of a certain RJ right-winger, who has so little credibility on this site that he has to return as a faceless sock puppet (and one plugging those sites).
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 11, 2016 12:35 AM GMT
    Another site:

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 11, 2016 12:43 AM GMT
    Ex_Mil8 saidI'm sure people will form their own conclusions as to the character, maturity and self-esteem of a certain RJ right-winger, who has so little credibility on this site that he has to return as a faceless sock puppet (and one plugging those sites).


    Gosh, sounds like so many Libtards here, with their many narcissistic delusions.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 11, 2016 12:51 AM GMT
    God_Said saidGosh, sounds like so many Libtards here, with their many narcissistic delusions.

    If you read the article below you will see the desperation that is increasingly influencing the Clinton campaign. Add that to the reaction of those on this site with personality disorders and you will see increasing hysteria. Sometimes I just ignore them. Other times I have to admit it's fun to poke them and watch them squeal.

    Desperation drives campaign strategy of demonizing Trump supporters

    This week could be the point of no return for the faltering Clinton campaign. The elitism that is a defining characteristic of the contemporary political establishment has lured the campaign into a strategic blunder. They are in a panic with Trump closing the polling gap in battleground states.

    So as panicked people sometimes do, the Brooklyn Brain Trust made a decision from the gut. They are scared of the Trump supporters, and they presume that their voters are, too. So scared that it makes sense to them for Bill and Hillary Clinton to publicly disparage a substantial fraction of the American public.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/09/desperation_drives_campaign_strategy_of_demonizing_trump_supporters.html
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 11, 2016 2:22 AM GMT
    bayguy saidThe following links are not always pro-Trump. Some include critical articles. But for those who want a balance to the stuff posted here, check them out. Do your own research and form your own conclusions.

    There is no need to engage in arguments with the few hard-core anti-Trump zealots here. One is insane. One is delusional and immature for a 60+ year old. One's personality disorder is characterized by an obsessive/compulsive disorder. One has a personality disorder characterized by an inferiority complex and low self-esteem. Ignore them and go to other sources, not just their parroting from extreme left sites or biased mainstream sources.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/

    http://dailycaller.com/

    http://spectator.org/

    http://www.drudgereport.com/

    http://www.breitbart.com/

    http://www.foxnews.com/



    Excellent sources....and every news website above made it there because CNN NBC CBS ABC failed to do their jobs.

    For example......drudgereport.com broke the story on Bill Clinton Lying Under Oath about sex in the Oval Office. CNN had the story, but killed it because they supported Clinton.

    I want the real news....not fake North Korea style propaganda.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 11, 2016 2:32 AM GMT
    S2Ki said
    bayguy saidThe following links are not always pro-Trump. Some include critical articles. But for those who want a balance to the stuff posted here, check them out. Do your own research and form your own conclusions.

    There is no need to engage in arguments with the few hard-core anti-Trump zealots here. One is insane. One is delusional and immature for a 60+ year old. One's personality disorder is characterized by an obsessive/compulsive disorder. One has a personality disorder characterized by an inferiority complex and low self-esteem. Ignore them and go to other sources, not just their parroting from extreme left sites or biased mainstream sources.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/

    http://dailycaller.com/

    http://spectator.org/

    http://www.drudgereport.com/

    http://www.breitbart.com/

    http://www.foxnews.com/



    Excellent sources....and every news website above made it there because CNN NBC CBS ABC failed to do their jobs.

    For example......drudgereport.com broke the story on Bill Clinton Lying Under Oath about sex in the Oval Office. CNN had the story, but killed it because they supported Clinton.

    I want the real news....not fake North Korea style propaganda.

    CNN is after all Communist Network News.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 11, 2016 2:41 AM GMT
    bayguy said
    God_Said saidGosh, sounds like so many Libtards here, with their many narcissistic delusions.

    If you read the article below you will see the desperation that is increasingly influencing the Clinton campaign. Add that to the reaction of those on this site with personality disorders and you will see increasing hysteria. Sometimes I just ignore them. Other times I have to admit it's fun to poke them and watch them squeal.

    Desperation drives campaign strategy of demonizing Trump supporters

    This week could be the point of no return for the faltering Clinton campaign. The elitism that is a defining characteristic of the contemporary political establishment has lured the campaign into a strategic blunder. They are in a panic with Trump closing the polling gap in battleground states.

    So as panicked people sometimes do, the Brooklyn Brain Trust made a decision from the gut. They are scared of the Trump supporters, and they presume that their voters are, too. So scared that it makes sense to them for Bill and Hillary Clinton to publicly disparage a substantial fraction of the American public.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/09/desperation_drives_campaign_strategy_of_demonizing_trump_supporters.html

    Fasanating, RJ is not without it's Libtard elitists. Was to see on the news this Morning that the Libtards of Minnesota I think it was, are attempting to have Trump removed from the Ballard papers. Are they feeling threatened and insecure about something.
    Was also to watch a story on Americas rust cities, that were once Democrat strong holds. But are now turning their backs on the Democrats, and looking at voting for Trump, as they have nothing to loose.
    The thing that keeps one coming back after all those years are the Libtards. They're fun to play with, and are so bloody entertaining. Corrected, one did not write salad roll.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 11, 2016 3:42 AM GMT
    God_Said said..... RJ is not without it's Libtard elitists....

    I certainly wouldn't call them 'elitists' in the sense that they are far from elite. Another meaning is they believe society should be governed by an elite class. That might apply in that they want to be led. But to not split hairs, they are the dregs of society. Could also be called flotsam and jetsam.

    A group picture of RJ far left radicals
    flotsamjetsam.jpg

    Flotsam and jetsam are terms that describe two types of marine debris associated with vessels. Flotsam is defined as debris in the water that was not deliberately thrown overboard, often as a result from a shipwreck or accident. Jetsam describes debris that was deliberately thrown overboard by a crew of a ship in distress, most often to lighten the ship's load. The word flotsam derives from the French word floter, to float. Jetsam is a shortened word for jettison.
    http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/flotsam-jetsam.html
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 11, 2016 4:11 AM GMT
    One is humble enough to stand corrected. Okay, they are not elitist. But they are sheep, who blindly follow.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 11, 2016 9:06 PM GMT
    God_Said saidOne is humble enough to stand corrected. Okay, they are not elitist. But they are sheep, who blindly follow.

    No no not correcting you. One definition of an elitist is someone who wants a system governed by elites. They, themselves, would not necessarily be elite. So your label could apply. My only point was to emphasize that they are not elite, instead flotsam and jetsam. (One of the dummies might take that literally vs a characterization.)
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 11, 2016 9:19 PM GMT
    I've read those shit pieces.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 11, 2016 9:33 PM GMT
    bayguy said
    God_Said saidOne is humble enough to stand corrected. Okay, they are not elitist. But they are sheep, who blindly follow.

    No no not correcting you. One definition of an elitist is someone who wants a system governed by elites. They, themselves, would not necessarily be elite. So your label could apply. My only point was to emphasize that they are not elite, instead flotsam and jetsam. (One of the dummies might take that literally vs a characterization.)



    Sounds like trump to me:
    "Elitism' also refers to situations in which an individual assumes special 'privileges' and responsibilities in the hope that this arrangement will benefit humanity or themselves. Elitism is closely related to social class and what sociologists call social stratification. Members of the upper classes are sometimes known as the social elite. The term elitism is also sometimes used to denote situations in which a group of people claiming to possess high abilities or simply an in-group or cadre grant themselves extra privileges at the expense of others. This form of elitism may be described as discrimination."