Reversed Twink and Muscle

  • Alchemical

    Posts: 1

    Sep 24, 2016 6:23 AM GMT
    Out of curiousity, many find the norm of a skinnier dude being dominated and what not by a big muscular guy to be common, But for me I find I like a muscular guy wanting to be dominated more enjoyable.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 24, 2016 1:50 PM GMT
    Hormones keep that from happening.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 24, 2016 3:53 PM GMT
    My boyfriend loves it when I dominate him...and prefers it. And he is more muscular than me icon_twisted.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 25, 2016 4:32 AM GMT
    I changed that scenario,my test was low and my bf wasnt muscular,I just thought I should submit. Well gym and hrt changed me to a more buff guy from a twink!. We still together and dont play that stupid roles we dom natural subs together what fun we having.
  • hrdcoach

    Posts: 19

    Sep 25, 2016 5:14 PM GMT
    Any kind of reversal situation can be hot. Nerd type usually have a good imagination and can work out hot scenes.

    Also I've found some normally assertive guys like a bit of a break from the alpha male role they usually play.
  • camfer

    Posts: 892

    Sep 26, 2016 12:32 AM GMT
    Well, I don't think your norm is the only norm out there. The gay community also has the stereotype of the Muscle Mary, a man who at first glance appears as the "masculine" ideal of being fit and muscular, but whose personality is more "feminine."

    My advice is to like who you like, and get past all these insanely minute categorizations that we had to create before we achieved greater acceptance.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 26, 2016 9:03 AM GMT
    When I was single I was pretty twinky, and thankfully there were a lot of big muscle bottoms out there who loved being dominated by a slimmer guy icon_twisted.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 26, 2016 9:19 AM GMT
    It's like when a white dude tops a black dude. Porn tells us that's not how it's supposed to be. So it feels slightly transgressive which adds a little extra spice.
    Trust me, there are plenty of muscular black men who like getting topped by a slimmer white guy . icon_twisted.gif
  • cgr1

    Posts: 28

    Sep 27, 2016 11:36 AM GMT
    Wyndahoi saidIt's like when a white dude tops a black dude. Porn tells us that's not how it's supposed to be. So it feels slightly transgressive which adds a little extra spice.
    Trust me, there are plenty of muscular black men who like getting topped by a slimmer white guy . icon_twisted.gif


    I think this is because, in the ancient times, when two men were fighting against each other, the loser became the slave of the other. So had to submit, which can up to the killing of the loser. But it could also become a sexual object for the winner, especially in men's societies, where there were no women. So that was the physical inferiority that allowed to designate those who compensate for this lack of not having trained enough to stay in the upper caste of real men. It was not a choice but an easement.
    Rule accepted by all, as it was applied in reverse if different outcome of combat.

    Certainly now that has changed. But there are still men who refuse to be botommed. Because this appearance of feminizing of the act.
    But that's why imagine a puny guy embuggering a very muscular guy can be very exciting, because it would be the weakest who would become the most manly of the two! So, all, we could have a chance to ride a beautiful horse.

    In the case of white and black, is more complex because it is the slavery which has created the idea that the white dominate and theblack suffer to be inferior because of color's skin.
    With the abolition of slavery and the principle of equality between individuals, a blackman dominant a white man can be interpreted as a revenge for the the past, while the opposite would be a return to a past socially rejected as contrary to the current ethics where all men are equal and are born free of all constraints
    Claude
  • gearhappy

    Posts: 5

    Oct 12, 2016 6:03 PM GMT
    hm, not so much domination, just fucking.

    i'm a smaller guy, with a lean, twinkish build, but i love to top more muscular and lean-muscular guys who are bigger than me.

    it's an uphill walk, because it's not the norm. people who say that there are guys like that out there, i'm certainly not having a lot of success in finding them. maybe it's time to go with plan b and learn to bottom hahaha.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 27, 2016 4:13 PM GMT
    I think thats rare.

    I had the opportunity to top only one bodybuilder. Enjoyed it.

    Rest treat me as their wives in bed icon_eek.gif
  • Bruiserwood

    Posts: 4

    Nov 30, 2016 2:44 PM GMT
    I definitely prefer to be in the submissive role myself...
    I actually find it quite frustrating that the majority of people assume I'm a dom/Sir/Alpha because I work out.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 30, 2016 6:11 PM GMT
    Nothing is set in stone !!
    Muscular guys do not have to be the dominant or the top
    Skinny guys do not have to be the submissive one or the bottom ..
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Nov 30, 2016 8:15 PM GMT
    Nothing hotter than a muscular masculine bottom.
  • Unzipped1

    Posts: 166

    Dec 01, 2016 8:58 AM GMT
    I think that having a lack in morals and focusing on acts of the flesh is what creates the whole Dom/Sub role.

    Once you establish morals and a clean lifestyle you will no longer seek deviancy.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 01, 2016 9:31 AM GMT
    Unzipped1 saidI think that having a lack in morals and focusing on acts of the flesh is what creates the whole Dom/Sub role.

    Once you establish morals and a clean lifestyle you will no longer seek deviancy.


    I don't think your lifestyle has much to do with your sexual desires. You could be a whore and be successful and preofessional. For some people, the kindy side is reserved for private individuals
  • 1LuckyBoy

    Posts: 44

    Dec 01, 2016 4:38 PM GMT
    Unzipped1 saidI think that having a lack in morals and focusing on acts of the flesh is what creates the whole Dom/Sub role.

    Once you establish morals and a clean lifestyle you will no longer seek deviancy.


    There is actually nothing immoral about being more dominant/submissive than your partner. In fact, every relationship type has these roles (gay, straight, etc.). It comes from ones personality traits and brain chemistry, just as sexuality does. Try opening a book before opening your mouth about something you clearly don't understand.

    Got to love a guy on a "moral high horse" campaign, who is on a gay/bi website filled with naked pictures and men talking about sexual topics. Pot, meet kettle!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 01, 2016 6:12 PM GMT
    [quote][cite] Once you establish morals and a clean lifestyle you will no longer seek deviancy.[/quote]

    In a gay website, where ALL of US would learn to accommodate one another, I am shocked at the his use of word "deviancy"! .....of what could it be interpreted !
  • Unzipped1

    Posts: 166

    Dec 01, 2016 11:57 PM GMT
    Desire_It said
    Unzipped1 saidI think that having a lack in morals and focusing on acts of the flesh is what creates the whole Dom/Sub role.

    Once you establish morals and a clean lifestyle you will no longer seek deviancy.


    There is actually nothing immoral about being more dominant/submissive than your partner. In fact, every relationship type has these roles (gay, straight, etc.). It comes from ones personality traits and brain chemistry, just as sexuality does. Try opening a book before opening your mouth about something you clearly don't understand.

    Got to love a guy on a "moral high horse" campaign, who is on a gay/bi website filled with naked pictures and men talking about sexual topics. Pot, meet kettle!


    I was referring specifically to homosexual fetishes with Dom and Sub roles. I understand all I need to know about male on male sexuality from experience and the flaws are very outwardly visible not only to the gay community but to the straight community as well. We need to clean up our acts and focus more on things other than sex.
  • Unzipped1

    Posts: 166

    Dec 01, 2016 11:59 PM GMT
    ilove_bodybuilders said[quote][cite] Once you establish morals and a clean lifestyle you will no longer seek deviancy.


    In a gay website, where ALL of US would learn to accommodate one another, I am shocked at the his use of word "deviancy"! .....of what could it be interpreted ![/quote]

    I said what I said. Deviancy is a term in a dictionary so there is no misunderstanding, maybe language barriers alter your understanding but I think we all understand my context.

    If you interpret things wrong, that is your problem not mine.
  • 1LuckyBoy

    Posts: 44

    Dec 02, 2016 1:56 PM GMT
    Unzipped1 said I was referring specifically to homosexual fetishes with Dom and Sub roles. I understand all I need to know about male on male sexuality from experience and the flaws are very outwardly visible not only to the gay community but to the straight community as well. We need to clean up our acts and focus more on things other than sex.


    It sounds like what you really take issue with is the sexual promiscuity and alt-lifestyles and the "image" it gives the rest of us in the gay community. That said, dominant/submissive are not homosexual fetishes. If you put two people next to each other, one is going to be more dominant than the other. In the bedroom, it is all about the hard-wiring in ones brain, just like a personality trait. Sexuality is indeed a very complex matter... calling people a "deviant" for this makes you sound uneducated and silly. That's all.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 04, 2016 5:57 PM GMT
    Unzipped1 said

    If you interpret things wrong, that is your problem not mine.



    So there is a "wrong" or right interpretation ? !!! icon_eek.gif
    And there is also a "problem" with someone here ? icon_rolleyes.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Dec 05, 2016 2:17 AM GMT
    Alchemical saidOut of curiousity, many find the norm of a skinnier dude being dominated and what not by a big muscular guy to be common, But for me I find I like a muscular guy wanting to be dominated more enjoyable.


    I agree but most guys get there ideas from porn and their isn't enough imagination in that industry to put out porn like that. I for one find the circle of muscle guys passing around a skinny twink so tired and boring. Liven it up make it that the muscle guys get over run and thrown down by a small tirade of twinks
  • rvmj_05

    Posts: 36

    Dec 06, 2016 11:46 AM GMT
    they love the idea of me tieing and blindfolding them up then im gonna ride them like a cowboy ;)