The most dangerous social experiment ever

  • jlars12

    Posts: 92

    Sep 29, 2016 4:20 AM GMT
    Don't they know that little kids have been shot within seconds for much less?!

  • you_know_Its_...

    Posts: 311

    Sep 29, 2016 4:48 AM GMT
    Obviously the purpose is to see how cops react. White guy has a close-up chat with the cops, and of course the black guy was one sneeze from getting shot at a distance. Ah Murica...
  • jlars12

    Posts: 92

    Sep 29, 2016 5:19 AM GMT
    I'd be fearful if I saw someone carrying that on the street for no reason, but the take-away here is that dumb can get you killed - only if you're black.
  • craycraydoesd...

    Posts: 740

    Sep 29, 2016 5:34 AM GMT
    jlars12 said I'd be fearful if I saw someone carrying that on the street for no reason, but the take-away here is that dumb can get you killed - only if you're black.


    Ekho knows, he's just one of those Breitbart followers who'd argue that kicking Rosa Parks from the front of the bus is about making room for the elderly icon_lol.gif
  • Apparition

    Posts: 3795

    Sep 30, 2016 12:58 AM GMT
    im a little baffled by the traffic...personally If I saw police with weapons drawn....I would be moving a little more quickly out of there...
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 30, 2016 7:16 PM GMT
    I know nothing of the producers of the vid other than the intro on it. While this might seem especially stupid because of the inherent risk taken while even failing to isolate skin color as determining factor--by way of differing hair styles and clothing and different cops in each incident--was that even the point of the vid or something not just stupidly dangerous but also nefariously prejudiced by using a black guy to show that the "right" to carry has not yet been assured.

    Was this a vid about discrimination or about gun rights?

    Because wouldn't the question follow that if authority can take away the rifle of a perceived black thug, then are rednecks' "right" to carry yet secured? So then is an anti-discrimination issue being used to further abuses upon society by the gun lobby?

    I don't know if that's the case here, having not investigated further, but if so, then this was not just dangerous & stupid but also creepy as fuck.