I know nothing of the producers of the vid other than the intro on it. While this might seem especially stupid because of the inherent risk taken while even failing to isolate skin color as determining factor--by way of differing hair styles and clothing and different cops in each incident--was that even the point of the vid or something not just stupidly dangerous but also nefariously prejudiced by using a black guy to show that the "right" to carry has not yet been assured.
Was this a vid about discrimination or about gun rights?
Because wouldn't the question follow that if authority can take away the rifle of a perceived black thug, then are rednecks' "right" to carry yet secured? So then is an anti-discrimination issue being used to further abuses upon society by the gun lobby?
I don't know if that's the case here, having not investigated further, but if so, then this was not just dangerous & stupid but also creepy as fuck.