The AyaTrolLiar insanity continues:When terrorists target youth night clubs, school buses and stops, malls and cafes, etc., there is no reason to expect a random distribution.
AyaTrolLiar> What? "Terrorists" only target high school buses and yeshiva students?
He introduced the word "only", making his statement a straw man.
(An especially dense move given that my non-exhaustive list had other examples, too.)
AyaTrolLiar> "terrorists" MOSTLY target non-infant and 15-17-year-old children
There he goes again, coherent thought is simply beyond him.
No wonder he quotes "terrorists", because, you know, people who intentionally blow up children are "freedom fighters", eh?
AyaTrolLiar> an age group you sought to deny were children because "military age" in Gaza is one year younger than in the UK
Chalk up another epic mental failure. Nowhere did I claim that 15-17 year old children aren't children.
I pointed out that Saudi law (yup, the troll has totally lost track of the thread's topic once he saw the word Israel) does and that this is common in the mideast, including 15 being military age.
Seeking to justify this because the UK shamefully allows recruits as young as 16 (one of only 20 countries to do so, in violation of international standards) is another example of petty pouncer's perverse style of "argument". He should be condemning UK, not use itto try and justify Hamas while claiming - pretending - to condemn Hamas for this.
As I'm sure he knows, again highlighting his useless idiot dishonesty, the UK doesn't allow 16 and 17 year old recruits to participate in combat. So again his pathetic apologism fails miserably.There are more teenagers at a mall than infants
AyaTrolLiar> A lot depends on where the bomb is placed.
Once again showing us that statistics are beyond him. As is logic: at best he's arguing that terrorists target 15-17 year old children (what a relief, eh? Almost makes them human) rather than toddlers and infants. Yet we know that his Hamas and other terrorist heroes have no compunction about brutally murdering infants and toddlers, too.
AyaTrolLiar> children (including 15-17-year-olds) represent the smallest fraction of Israeli civilians killed
Now he's trying to defend his prior lie with new irrelevancies, again at the expense of the larger point.There are no toddlers, only 15-17 year olds, in a high school yeshiva classroom
AyaTrolLiar> So they are deliberately targeting those they perceive to be of military age?
I thought the propaganda line was that they picked out soft targets?
This is the closest he gets to the topic, but only to twist it into a pretzel.
Israeli high school children are not "of military age" and are not perceived as such, either.
Schools are soft targets.
AyaTrolLiar> You mean like mosques and nurseries in Gaza?
When mosques and schools are used to store rockets, or are tunnel terminals, they are not "soft targets" but legitimate military targets.
AyaTrolLIar> Why not nurseries and elementary schools? You know, like the 263 Palestinian nurseries struck by Israel in the course of "Operation Cast Lead" two years ago?
Really? This "all around shitty excuse of a human being" (as Sharkspeare famously noted) is asking why terrorists don't go after even softER targets?
Cast Lead was going on 8 years ago and this is another invented BS "statistic".
AyaTrolLiar> "Operation Protective Edge" two years ago
Once an idiot, always an idiot. He can't help it.
How odd that in bombing so many "nurseries", few toddlers and many terrorists were killed.
AyaTrolLiar> blah blah blah
|| According to data provided by the Palestinian International Middle East Media Center, 79.7% of the Palestinians killed in Gaza were male, with the majority between 16 and 35 (fighting-age)
This segment of the population represents a mere 9% of the population, but they were hanging out at "nurseries" and "mosques" during a war?Hamas admits it lied about Casualties... Yet some RJers still attempt to spam & perpetuate those propaganda lies-for-the-cause?!http://www.realjock.com/gayforums/1217613
AyaTrolLiar> A discredited allegation
ROTFL. Nothing at all "discredited" about it, and it correlates well to other data.
AyaTrolLiar> one conflict out of eight
One of the two largest in recent years.
It is well known that Hamas lies, just as it is well known that in his usual reversal of the scientific method, AyaTrolLiar Founcer/JTheM laps up those lies and regurgitates them (because they conform to his preconceived notions which he masquerades as "conclusions" or worse, a "model").one can't logically claim that Israeli is "randomly" bombing Gaza other than by ignoring that casualties are not random. Few are women, children under 15 or the elderly. The majority are males of fighting age - which unfortunately includes 15 year olds
AyaTrolLiar> the bombing is quite deliberate, with an estimated 99% of IDF bombs hitting their targets. Hardly "random".Those targets are not civilians but terrorists who "cowardly blend" amongst and behind civilians, e.g. firing rockets from school yards and hospital grounds (but this useless idiot thinks that is not "human shielding" because - contrary to international law - he thinks that's only when civilians are located to military targets but not when military targets are located behind civilians).
AyaTrolLiar> like Israel fires into Gaza from kibbutzim and the middle of populated cities?
Israel did no such thing. The rockets fired from urban areas were anti-missile missiles, to shoot down rockets intentionally fired at Israeli population centers in violation of international law.
AyaTrolLiar> You're welcome to quote back to me any statements "justifying" or "supporting" the killing of collaborators in Gaza. If I recall, I was quite clear in condemning such murders
One need only look 2 paragraphs later:
AyaTrolLiar> Hamas (one of countless armed groups that execute collaborators in the course of warfare
That's his idea of "condemning".
No wonder he can't reference himself doing so and seeks to put the burden on me.
AyaTrolLiar> [still can't provide an example of condemnation]Hamas Commander, Accused of Gay Sex, Is Killed by His Ownhttp://www.realjock.com/gayforums/4188753
I guess he doesn't "recall", but he defended this murder on the trumped charge that the victim also "stole".
Ah, ok, no need for a trial then, eh?
The penalty for theft is summary execution?
AyaTrolLiar> I agreed that no action was justified without a trial.
You didn't and you served as a Hamas ass-wiper apologist, failing to condemn them for yet another murder.
You attempted to divert with Saudi Arabia, then with Israel, then asked why so much scrutiny on Hamas.