American Mel, dumped.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2009 7:24 AM GMT
    Once hot American Mel Gibson, is to be divorced by his soon to be ex wife, of almost 30 years.

    Is it to do with this Russian doll?

    Now Hollywood's bad boy is free agin / available, would you date him?

    Oh one stated he is American. I know we all know this, it's not new news.

    But one did read in a local paper today, where they referred to Mel as Australian; at least they did not call him an Aussie. Yet he was born in the USA, and has called America home agin for years, and he only spent a few years in oz. Why would anyone call Mel Australian?

    Oh, I would not date him! My preference, his to old.

  • zakariahzol

    Posts: 2241

    Apr 15, 2009 12:50 PM GMT
    Yes, I know his American (born in New York , if I am not mistaken) but start his carrier in Australia and probably grow up in Australia. He even talk with Australian accent . I use to love Mel Gibson especially his earlier movie like
    "The Year of Living Dangerously" and a few other. It doesnt matter if I want to date him or not. He is straight, live in another place and I probably never gonna meet him anyway. But this guy is good looking , no doubt about it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2009 1:24 PM GMT
    I used to love him after he made that very crude comment back in the 90's when a reporter asked him about his gay fan base. After that I never paid to see another film of his. Vowed never to watch another movie until "Passion of the Christ" which was excellent. He is very homophobic. There was no pre-nupt so the wife gets a bundle! You go girl. That's why she filed in California.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2009 1:51 PM GMT
    C'mon Patty Cakes. You really need to drop the illiterate inbred routine. Most of us have figured out that "One" is just a online persona you've created to work out whatever issues you might have floating around in that deranged noggin of yours.

    I'll say this to everyone who thinks they might rise to the bait he has laid out. 1) having exchanged multiple e-mils with him over the last year I can tell you his spelling, grammar and command of the English language is actually impeccable when he's not in character. 2) The observations he makes in posts don't actually reflect what he himself believes. He is just throwing discussion grenades into a crowded room to see what moron throws himself on one. Again, this has been confirmed through my own e-mail exchanges with him, and those of others that have exchanged e-mails with him.

    This concludes this emergency public service announcement. We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2009 2:07 PM GMT
    jprichva saidI have not exchanged e-mails with him, nor would I care to.

    My objection isn't that he's illiterate, or that constant "One" business, it's that he is so desperate for attention that he manages to make every thread he contributes to about himself. He has exactly six things to say, and has said them a thousand times.:
    1. He is "pure" homosexual, which sounds a lot like "pure" Aryan.
    2. He hates the gay community, and has given back his gay card, whatever the fuck that means.
    3. He is an aristocrat. His exact title, I believe, is the Duke of Gibberish.
    4. He is the only fag in the village. Again, whatever this means.
    5. He has two husbands, though neither of them live nearby, and they both love him to bits. Deranged fantasy? Probably, but who cares.
    6. He hates Democrats and thinks he knows something about US politics. He doesn't, but it doesn't stop him from telling us all he does because he went to Utah once or something.

    And that's it. Over and over, repeatedly, ad nauseam.


    And it's all 100% bullshit. He's playing a character for the sake of attention. He's even admitted it to a few of us in private e-mails. He doesn't actually believe anything he says in these threads. It's just a big game to see how many people he can piss off. It would be like you or I pretending to share the same values and political beliefs as the long departed John90210, or whatever his name was, just to see how many people we could could provoke.

    The six things you object to are the core he's constructed the character about. He sometimes lapses into inconsistency with his grammar and spelling, but he's very sure to bring up some of those points in every thread he starts or contributes to. I will admit I truly admire the timing and placement of some of his posts. He almost seems to have sixth sense as to where and how to place them for maximum effect.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2009 2:07 PM GMT
    Wow. So now you're exposed, Pattison. Uh, 'bye now!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2009 2:45 PM GMT
    jprichva said4. He is the only fag in the village. Again, whatever this means.

    It derives from the old concept of the Village Idiot, a title some might contend he concurrently holds, as well. Which would not only seem a bit selfish to me, holding 2 jobs at once, but would give gays a bad name where he lives. On the other hand, perhaps it would enhance the reputation of idiots.

    But whether his online persona is contrived or congenital, as some have debated here, I find little to enjoy about it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2009 3:03 PM GMT
    jprichva saidI have not exchanged e-mails with him, nor would I care to.

    My objection isn't that he's illiterate, or that constant "One" business, it's that he is so desperate for attention that he manages to make every thread he contributes to about himself. He has exactly six things to say, and has said them a thousand times.:
    1. He is "pure" homosexual, which sounds a lot like "pure" Aryan.
    2. He hates the gay community, and has given back his gay card, whatever the fuck that means.
    3. He is an aristocrat. His exact title, I believe, is the Duke of Gibberish.
    4. He is the only fag in the village. Again, whatever this means.
    5. He has two husbands, though neither of them live nearby, and they both love him to bits. Deranged fantasy? Probably, but who cares.
    6. He hates Democrats and thinks he knows something about US politics. He doesn't, but it doesn't stop him from telling us all he does because he went to Utah once or something.

    And that's it. Over and over, repeatedly, ad nauseam.


    I wish, more than anything right now, that I could give you a really big and sexy hug!
  • CAtoFL

    Posts: 834

    Apr 15, 2009 3:42 PM GMT
    Why respond to an uninventive character? If it's just a game, why play?

    Clearly, his pretense is in place to make him feel as though he's putting something over on the participants of this site. As though that's some expression of superiority. In fact, it reveals a person of such limited self-respect that he feels threatened to show his true self.

    Frankly, I don't think anyone gives a rat's ass who he truly is or what his grammatical capabilities are. He's a fraud playing a game to convince himself he's better than anyone else. Using improper grammar, poor thought processes and improbable conclusions to interact with the 'common folk' (i.e., the real jocks).

    The irony is that it glowingly illustrates his inferiority, not his self-perceived superiority. It's stupid. It's blatant. It's unnecessary. And most of all (as jprichva points out), it's predictable and boring.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2009 3:49 PM GMT
    PSCalif saidWhy respond to an uninventive character? If it's just a game, why play?

    Clearly, his pretense is in place to make him feel as though he's putting something over on the participants of this site. As though that's some expression of superiority. In fact, it reveals a person of such limited self-respect that he feels threatened to show his true self.

    Frankly, I don't think anyone gives a rat's ass who he truly is or what his grammatical capabilities are. He's a fraud playing a game to convince himself he's better than anyone else. Using improper grammar, poor thought processes and improbable conclusions to interact with the 'common folk' (i.e., the real jocks).

    The irony is that it glowingly illustrates his inferiority, not his self-perceived superiority. It's stupid. It's blatant. It's unnecessary. And most of all (as jprichva points out), it's predictable and boring.


    Exactly!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2009 4:04 PM GMT
    Umm, back on topic?

    Mel Gibson deserves everything he gets. He's a homophobe (even though I know for a FACT he's been blown off by another guy in a toilet -hehe, it was me!)

    I cannot believe he is worth 1.2 billion now - that's the same as Oprah!

    The news that he was going to be making another Mad Max film seems like nonsense now - no film studio is going to touch him.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2009 8:04 PM GMT
    hahaha called out, and then weirdly absent from the thread
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2009 8:16 PM GMT
    GuerrillaSodomite saidC'mon Patty Cakes. You really need to drop the illiterate inbred routine. Most of us have figured out that "One" is just a online persona you've created to work out whatever issues you might have floating around in that deranged noggin of yours.

    I'll say this to everyone who thinks they might rise to the bait he has laid out. 1) having exchanged multiple e-mils with him over the last year I can tell you his spelling, grammar and command of the English language is actually impeccable when he's not in character. 2) The observations he makes in posts don't actually reflect what he himself believes. He is just throwing discussion grenades into a crowded room to see what moron throws himself on one. Again, this has been confirmed through my own e-mail exchanges with him, and those of others that have exchanged e-mails with him.

    This concludes this emergency public service announcement. We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.


    Here's a great article on internet Trolls (featuring a troll named "Weev" who recently tried to take credit for the Amazon GLBT listing mistake).

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/magazine/03trolls-t.html

    "The trolls employed what the M.I.T. professor Judith Donath calls a “pseudo-naïve” tactic, asking stupid questions and seeing who would rise to the bait. The game was to find out who would see through this stereotypical newbie behavior, and who would fall for it. As one guide to trolldom puts it, “If you don’t fall for the joke, you get to be in on it.”"

    "“Lulz” is how trolls keep score. ...“lulz” means the joy of disrupting another’s emotional equilibrium. “Lulz is watching someone lose their mind at their computer 2,000 miles away while you chat with friends and laugh,” said one ex-troll..."

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2009 8:18 PM GMT
    cronker saidThe news that he was going to be making another Mad Max film seems like nonsense now - no film studio is going to touch him.

    The film industry is totally amoral. Mel Gibson could be a serial killer, rather than than just the homophobic S&M freak he is, and it wouldn't make any difference if they thought he could make money.

    Whereas they wouldn't touch the likes of a Mother Theresa if they didn't see the profit in it. So while I agree that Mel Gibson is a completely repugnant character, when did that ever concern Hollywood? So long as the public will buy tickets to see him (and the red-neck market is very big), Mel's got a future. Please forgive the cynic in me, but I also think I'm being a realist.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2009 8:18 PM GMT
    "poof! and like that..... he was gone"


    usualsuspects_l.jpg

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2009 8:31 PM GMT
    NakedDevil said
    GuerrillaSodomite saidC'mon Patty Cakes. You really need to drop the illiterate inbred routine. Most of us have figured out that "One" is just a online persona you've created to work out whatever issues you might have floating around in that deranged noggin of yours.

    I'll say this to everyone who thinks they might rise to the bait he has laid out. 1) having exchanged multiple e-mils with him over the last year I can tell you his spelling, grammar and command of the English language is actually impeccable when he's not in character. 2) The observations he makes in posts don't actually reflect what he himself believes. He is just throwing discussion grenades into a crowded room to see what moron throws himself on one. Again, this has been confirmed through my own e-mail exchanges with him, and those of others that have exchanged e-mails with him.

    This concludes this emergency public service announcement. We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.


    Here's a great article on internet Trolls (featuring a troll named "Weev" who recently tried to take credit for the Amazon GLBT listing mistake).

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/magazine/03trolls-t.html

    "The trolls employed what the M.I.T. professor Judith Donath calls a “pseudo-naïve” tactic, asking stupid questions and seeing who would rise to the bait. The game was to find out who would see through this stereotypical newbie behavior, and who would fall for it. As one guide to trolldom puts it, “If you don’t fall for the joke, you get to be in on it.”"

    "“Lulz” is how trolls keep score. ...“lulz” means the joy of disrupting another’s emotional equilibrium. “Lulz is watching someone lose their mind at their computer 2,000 miles away while you chat with friends and laugh,” said one ex-troll..."



    Great article. Thanks Nekkid Oneicon_razz.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2009 8:33 PM GMT
    cronker saidThe news that he was going to be making another Mad Max film seems like nonsense now - no film studio is going to touch him.


    Except that the last movie he made, Apocalypto, came out right after his anti-semitic rant, and it still made bajillions of dollars.

    All Hollywood cares about is money. And frankly, despite his outbursts, I miss Mel Gibson in movies. I would pay a lot to see a new Mad Max movie starring Mel Gibson and directed by George Miller. I would pay even more to see a new Lethal Weapon movie starring the Gibz and written by Shane Black.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 16, 2009 5:10 AM GMT
    Nah, he looks all used up.

    What is it about Pattison that brings forth such craptastic replies?




    The song pretty much sucks, bet I get to act dastardly clever for posting videos that allude to something unsaid. See? Clever.
    God, I can't believe I listened through that whole thing.. *shudder*
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 16, 2009 5:19 AM GMT
    He and his wife have been separated for two years. Divorce just legally finalizes it so they can move on.

    Also, is Cronker actually claiming to have given head to Mel?
  • dglater

    Posts: 255

    Apr 20, 2009 7:01 PM GMT
    i hope his wife takes all his money